LOL. Wow. OK. Thanks for proving my point. UT isn't passing over the kids they want/need. We don't need Voytik. He's not the type of QB we are looking for. We don't HAVE to take a QB this year. That's still TBD, however. This isn't a charity. Bars wasn't good enough in the eyes of our staff. That's not passing him over. Plus we have the right to be picky at OL right now. Position of need? I might give you QB, but OL, DB, and even RB are not absolute needs in this class. We'll take 2-3 OLs every year from here on out. Hopefully they'll be top guys, most likely not just Tennessee kids.
I don't think Kimbrow will stick with Vandy like others have noticed as well. I still think UT would benefit from getting Kimbrow, but there is something happening that neither you nor I know about in his recruitment. We won't know for a while.
I see you continue to talk out of your ass. You didn't provide any qualified information, just your opinions. Your opinions and idiotic sarcasm are getting old, fast. There's always going to be UT homers here. It's kind of funny, though, you seem to fit into the "we didn't want him anyway" group if uninformed posters.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Maybe you do not know what the phrase "passing on" means. If the staff does not offer or accept a commitment from a local kid....YES...they PASSED on him. What has Kimbrow done to make you think he won't stick with Vandy except set a day to commit to them?
I have said from day 1 I would much prefer a bigger back who will actually get carries in the SEC. 200 and 4.4 trumps 165 and 4.3 any day. I may be uninformed..but we have offered alot of bigger backs of late and passed on your East Mississippi water bug.
