'12 SC WR Quinshad Davis

#27
#27
Hens67 said:
true that...There is a couple of guys I'd rather have Davis over no doubt
Click to expand...

I bet you've never even watched his film or even heard his name until today. Don't get mad, if thats not true then I'll admit I'm wrong.
 
#30
#30
Hens67 said:
true that...There is a couple of guys I'd rather have Davis over no doubt
Click to expand...

Can't say I don't agree. Peace out Z. Rogers and Matt Milton. They haven't done a thing. I was a supporter of Milton, but if V. Dallas and Arnett are getting PT over him, there is obviously something he's doing wrong. Moreover, Redding seems like nothing more than a role player to me. Maybe he impressed the coaches at his camp, but based on analysts and video, his biggest strengths were: strong, runs good routes. OK?
 
#31
#31
Ttucke11 said:
Well you got me then! :peace2: What do you not like about the guy?
Click to expand...

It really just boils down to me wanting Patterson....and the excuse that we are passing on him because he isn't an EE is bs when we offer this kid and he's not an EE either

I think we may lose out on Patterson
 
#32
#32
There are some SC fans that are pretty mad that this guy isn't a take for SC at the moment and want to make room for him somehow.
 
#33
#33
He's a really good one. He had a commitable offer to USCe at one point but he just missed the boat.
 
#34
#34
If the coaches are legitimately concerned about losing da'rick and hunter to the NFL then stockpiling WR in this class isn't a terrible idea considering Milton is gone and our other WR with talent are more slot type receivers. Hell maybe take Davis and Patterson. I'm starting to wonder if the coaches were going to take either Watson or Howard and took the first to commit.
 
#36
#36
Its possible the reasoning behind this offer could mean we have missed out on Patterson or Howard. Most believe Patterson due to the fact of David and Patterson's sizes are very similar, but something tells me that Patterson will be a Vol when its all said and done.
 
#37
#37
Hens67 said:
It really just boils down to me wanting Patterson....and the excuse that we are passing on him because he isn't an EE is bs when we offer this kid and he's not an EE either

I think we may lose out on Patterson
Click to expand...

I think we miss on CP as well. But I would gladly take this dude IF he wants to come here.
 
#39
#39
Everytime I watch his highlights i wanna punch his QB. Just about every pass the QB had a few other players open and he went to QD. Anyways. The kid looks like he has good hands.
 
#40
#40
I personally do not see much difference between Redding and Davis--Just one guy's opinion.
 
#41
#41
Or it could mean that this kid is really really good & the staff wants him on our team, but I don't know why anyone would think that. It obviously means we are missing out on every recruit we are after, all of our commitments are decommiting & Dooley sucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#42
#42
jmoore_21 said:
Or it could mean that this kid is really really good & the staff wants him on our team, but I don't know why anyone would think that. It obviously means we are missing out on every recruit we are after, all of our commitments are decommiting & Dooley sucks.
Click to expand...

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

The sky is falling, the sky is falling!








(Sarcasm)
 
#43
#43
When it comes down to it, CDD is probably just going to take the best players available, that the staff wants. I don't think these offers have anything to do with their feelings about other players. I would love to get Pig, Davis, and Patterson, or at least two of the three.

Some of you would be b******* if we didn't offer this kid, but we later found out that he was available.
 
#44
#44
jmoore_21 said:
Or it could mean that this kid is really really good & the staff wants him on our team, but I don't know why anyone would think that. It obviously means we are missing out on every recruit we are after, all of our commitments are decommiting & Dooley sucks.
Click to expand...

Lol.. I know you're being sarcastic now, but u weren't earlier when u said we prob won't land Patterson and Howard, were u?
 
#47
#47
He has very good hands but his body control and leaping ability are what I like the most. He could be nasty in the redzone.
 
#48
#48
This is a very underrated wr who would be in knoxville for 4 years. He has a much better chance to play meaningful football than Patterson. Either kid will be a great pick up.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top