KeithStone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2010
- Messages
- 146
- Likes
- 0
No. Not at all. Just answering your insenuation that you can't use jump ball throws effectively or are destined to throw alot more picks if you do. It is another dimension that the DB must defend. If they position themselves to defend the jump ball then maybe you break off on a come back... take off on a go... break across on a drag. If your WR's are as athletic as Rogers and Hunter then the DB has to give something. If DB's play 2 dimensional then the jump ball gives the 3rd dimension and makes coverage another degree more difficult.
We need taller qb's in my opinion. Bray is perfect. He can see over anybody. He just needs bulk. 6'4"-6'6" is the qb's I like. Along with tall wr's.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Jump balls in the first 2 min were at 35 sec 57 sec 1:01 and 1:19. While some are great throws and great catches still jump balls. Im not understanding what everyone's point is towars me? Im not downing this guy or Bray. Simply saying he better be able to read a defense and not just rely on his reciever to go get the ball in college.
I'm not down on you... just discussing it to gain understanding. I am long past getting too hyped or too down over recruits. Who was excited when the 5.6 3* player Dan Williams signed in the same class as 4/5* players like Bolden, Henderson, Mathis,...
Austion Rogers was a 5.5 3* who became a solid role player with decent career stats. The blue chips in that class were Cox, and Shelley.
Point is... I need to see if they can actually play CFB before I get all jacked up. Peterman has at least some of the tools... including good ball placement.
He is 6'2 and isn't technically a SR yet. Could add some you never know. I was 5'10 start of SR year and ended up 6'1.Plus when your talking 2 inches in height when your over 6 foot its not that big of a difference. If Breed can see then Peterman can.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Maybe Peterman is better that Kiel?I just watched the film of both Nathan and Gunner, and am I the only one that liked Nathan's game better? I believe they both need a little work on mechanics, but I like Nathan's pocket presence, release, and overall style better. He's also playing against much tougher competition. I'll hang up and listen.
