hinder is consistantly ranked higher than montana. rivals doesnt' even have montana in their top 250. yes de la salle runs the spread, but the fact is nick couldnt' hack it there and ran like a little girl to whatever program would take him. if this happens in high school what do you think happens when he doesn't start immediately at UW?
No he isn't.
Just in the latest ESPN Camp or whatever, Montana was rated the best player while Hinder was the one with the most upside. It's a Greg Biggins article. Montana is even an Under Armour player along with Scroggins, Bells, and Phillip Sims.
Hinder got overrated in Rivals judging by what the other rankings are giving him. Not saying that Hinder isn't 4 star talent, but by all account he isn't the anywhere close to the #2 QB (Bells, Jones, Heaps are all better). Scout has him around #15 and that was after an ugly showing that once dropped him to 3 stars. At least at this point, 2/3 point toward Montana. Even Notre Dame's Gold Helmet private recruiting favors Montana over Hinder FWIW.
Actually, Montana went to So Cal for several reasons beside football. One of them was father business. One of them was a better style of offense. One of them was to get closer to Steve Clarkson. Nick didn't go to Oaks Christian solely to "escape".
And enough of this Montana stuff. As someone said earlier, this isn't a Pac 10 board.
