'10 CA QB Jesse Scroggins (USC Solid Verbal)

Which school will Scroggins verbally commit to tomorrow?

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
#705
#705
espn will be here on day scroggins is, peyton the special guest = peyton here the day scroggins is
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#708
#708
I do think we end up with Scroggins though. I do like Heaps a little bit more, but I'd be fine either way.

I see our class with Scroggins and maybe a guy like Bortles or maybe Nash Nance or something at QB.
 
#713
#713
I still think we try to get 2 QBs in this class. It will depend on if they can find two guys they like enough and can land, but remember, we went two classes without a QB and then lost a guy. Having a guy that's a Senior, a RS Soph, and two freshmen is a pretty ideal situation.
 
#714
#714
Sabanocchio said:
I still think we try to get 2 QBs in this class. It will depend on if they can find two guys they like enough and can land, but remember, we went two classes without a QB and then lost a guy. Having a guy that's a Senior, a RS Soph, and two freshmen is a pretty ideal situation.
Click to expand...
2-3 this year. We need the depth in a bad way
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#716
#716
Sabanocchio said:
I still think we try to get 2 QBs in this class. It will depend on if they can find two guys they like enough and can land, but remember, we went two classes without a QB and then lost a guy. Having a guy that's a Senior, a RS Soph, and two freshmen is a pretty ideal situation.
Click to expand...
Munchie may be our 2nd for 2010. If buried on the depth chart, he could switch positions
 
#717
#717
voltilifall said:
lamaison is in the '09 class why would he have any bearing on the '10 qb situation...he's just a depth chart guy not a potential starter
Click to expand...
Says who? T. Boyd would have been a good depth chart guy at the very least. Kiffin told him to find another home, right off the bat. Rozier is his rainyday/emergency plan.
Lamaison, if indeed he is offered and comes, is being brought in to...COMPETE with the yahoo's that were recruited by the previous staff. Meaning Kiffin thinks Lamaison's likely BETTER than what he inherited.
 
#718
#718
TENNaciousUTfan said:
Says who? T. Boyd would have been a good depth chart guy at the very least. Kiffin told him to find another home, right off the bat. Rozier is his rainyday/emergency plan.
Lamaison, if indeed he is offered and comes, is being brought in to...COMPETE with the yahoo's that were recruited by the previous staff. Meaning Kiffin thinks Lamaison's likely BETTER than what he inherited.
Click to expand...

Why are we still bringing up Boyd?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#719
#719
Lockdown1 said:
Why are we still bringing up Boyd?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
Because of all this talk about a supposed "Scrub" being brought in for depth. Kiffin thought Boyd wouldn't be able to keep from getting buried on the depth chart, and didn't want to WASTE a scholarship for a "Scrub."

So why would he try to bring in another for that VERY purpose? Coleman's reasoning for leaving was he felt he had seen and heard enough to surmise that CLK wanted HIS guys in here, and that the guys on the roster were rather expendable. CLK isn't wasting a scholly on a scrub to carry a clipboard. If Lamaison's a silent commit, it's because Kiffin and staff believes he can compete indeed. It's his 1st QB, and I doubt he's interested in screwing that up
 
Last edited:
#720
#720
Espousing.

To take in marriage; marry.
b. To give (a woman) in marriage.
2. To give one's loyalty or support to (a cause, for example); adopt.


Come again?
 
#721
#721
TENNaciousUTfan said:
Because of all this talk about a supposed "Scrub" being brought in for depth. Kiffin thought Boyd wouldn't be able to keep from getting buried on the depth chart, and didn't want to WASTE a scholarship for a "Scrub."

So why would he try to bring in another for that VERY purpose? Coleman's reasoning for leaving was he felt he had seen and heard enough to surmise that CLK wanted HIS guys in here, and that the guys on the roster were rather expendable. CLK isn't wasting a scholly on a scrub to carry a clipboard. If Lamaison's a silent commit, it's because Kiffin and staff believes he can compete indeed. It's his 1st QB, and I doubt he's interested in screwing that up
Click to expand...

Surgery.
 
#722
#722
the.one.the.only said:
Espousing.

To take in marriage; marry.
b. To give (a woman) in marriage.
2. To give one's loyalty or support to (a cause, for example); adopt.


Come again?
Click to expand...
Busted by the Grammar Police, am I?
Definitions of espouse on the Web:

* adopt: choose and follow; as of theories, ideas, policies, strategies or plans; "She followed the feminist movement"; "The candidate espouses ...
* marry: take in marriage
* take up the cause, ideology, practice, method, of someone and use it as one's own; "She embraced Catholicism"; "They adopted the Jewish faith"
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

http://dictionary.die.net/espouse


Have a nice day, officer
 
Last edited:
#724
#724
Sabanocchio said:
I still think we try to get 2 QBs in this class. It will depend on if they can find two guys they like enough and can land, but remember, we went two classes without a QB and then lost a guy. Having a guy that's a Senior, a RS Soph, and two freshmen is a pretty ideal situation.
Click to expand...

I agree. Maybe the 2nd would be Rees. It sounds like the staff loves him. The only problem is he is starting to get calls from people like Jim Tressell. His stock looks like it is gonna start climbing...
 
#725
#725
TENNaciousUTfan said:
Kiffin said verbatim that he felt Boyd DIDN'T FIT HIS SYSTEM, and he didn't want to bring a kid in knowing he'd likely GET BEAT OUT by the prospects in following classes.

I guess Kiffin is a liar...is that what you're suggesting?
Click to expand...

surgery. You think he'd come out and say Boyd jacked up his knee and I don't wanna risk signing him?
 
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top