Who do you want as president for 2016?

Who do you want as president in 2016?


  • Total voters
    0
The republican base is far too divided. Far too many votes will be given to third party candidates, votes that would have otherwise gone to the GOP. The damn democrats will probably win again
 
The republican base is far too divided. Far too many votes will be given to third party candidates, votes that would have otherwise gone to the GOP. The damn democrats will probably win again

Not really my problem if that happens.
 
That is by far the dumbest post I have ever saw from you bar none.

No, you like to paint yourself as a "moderate" when in reality you are pretty far left, liberal. I believe, no I know there are far more conservative voters out there than liberal. The problem with the Republican party is the conservative voters are split. The party continues to run Democrats in disguise and continues to lose because votes (large amounts) are siphoned off by third party candidates.

The people, majority of people are desirous of a conservative candidate that they can vote for. I haven't done the math but who would have one this past elections with a united conservative vote? How many people stayed home because the choice was between liberal 1 and liberal 1a?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
No, you like to paint yourself as a "moderate" when in reality you are pretty far left, liberal. I believe, no I know there are far more conservative voters out there than liberal. The problem with the Republican party is the conservative voters are split. The party continues to run Democrats in disguise and continues to lose because votes (large amounts) are siphoned off by third party candidates.

The people, majority of people are desirous of a conservative candidate that they can vote for. I haven't done the math but who would have one this past elections with a united conservative vote? How many people stayed home because the choice was between liberal 1 and liberal 1a?

He forgot that one is either a neocon or progressive. There is no middle ground. Black or white. Either with you or against you.

He's not in lockstep with the Tea Party, clearly Gramps is a tree huggin progressive liberal democrap.
 
He forgot that one is either a neocon or progressive. There is no middle ground. Black or white. Either with you or against you.

He's not in lockstep with the Tea Party, clearly Gramps is a tree huggin progressive liberal democrap.

You're talking about yourself when you say tree hugging,progressive democrap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
He forgot that one is either a neocon or progressive. There is no middle ground. Black or white. Either with you or against you.

He's not in lockstep with the Tea Party, clearly Gramps is a tree huggin progressive liberal democrap.

And there is your problem. The Tea Party movement like most grass root polical movements, once they gain some traction they are hijacked. Not all conservatives belong or support the Tea Party, I for one do not.

Let me give you my definition of a moderate. A person that votes for their own benefit regardless of the lasting consequences. To me that is worse than a liberal, at least a liberal has some principle.
 
No, you like to paint yourself as a "moderate" when in reality you are pretty far left, liberal. I believe, no I know there are far more conservative voters out there than liberal. The problem with the Republican party is the conservative voters are split. The party continues to run Democrats in disguise and continues to lose because votes (large amounts) are siphoned off by third party candidates.

The people, majority of people are desirous of a conservative candidate that they can vote for. I haven't done the math but who would have one this past elections with a united conservative vote? How many people stayed home because the choice was between liberal 1 and liberal 1a?


Anyone that does not fall in step with your views is a liberal. If you think for one minute there are enough members of the Republican base to nominate a far right wing candidate and that base be strong elect to elect that candidate in the general you simply dont have a clue. Look at the numbers, it is 4th grade math.
As far as moderates go, it is a growing block of votes. No Dem nor Republican can win the general without some moderate support. Why do you think Rand Paul is already moving slightly to the middle?
Per you definitions of a lib he is a lib. He hit the Sunday talk shows a few weeks ago promoting that congress should compromise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The way I would describe Gramps is that He's more liberal than most GOP members. He's along the lines of Nelson Rockefeller,Richard Nixon or Gerald Ford.

I think that is a fairly good assessment of my political views.
 
Anyone that does not fall in step with your views is a liberal. If you think for one minute there are enough members of the Republican base to nominate a far right wing candidate and that base be strong elect to elect that candidate in the general you simply dont have a clue. Look at the numbers, it is 4th grade math.
As far as moderates go, it is a growing block of votes. No Dem nor Republican can win the general without some moderate support. Why do you think Rand Paul is already moving slightly to the middle?
Per you definitions of a lib he is a lib. He hit the Sunday talk shows a few weeks ago promoting that congress should compromise.

Compromise on what? Just for the sake of doing something? Name something the conservatives should compromise on that is being proposed by this administration.
 
Compromise on what? Just for the sake of doing something? Name something the conservatives should compromise on that is being proposed by this administration.

Paul said that on many bills the two sides agree on 70-80%. They should pass what they agree on instead of doing nothing.

In you mind does that make him a liberal?

If not why, you keep calling GOP leaders that show any signs of working with the other side as selling out and call them libs.
 
Paul said that on many bills the two sides agree on 70-80%. They should pass what they agree on instead of doing nothing.

In you mind does that make him a liberal?

If not why, you keep calling GOP leaders that show any signs of working with the other side as selling out and call them libs.

To libs compromise is voting for whatever they put up to the vote in Congress. Compromise isn't working with republicans to them! I'm sick of republicans cow towing to the democraps and voting for what they put up out of fear that they wont be liked and invited to parties in DC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
To libs compromise is voting for whatever they put up to the vote in Congress. Compromise isn't working with republicans to them! I'm sick of republicans cow towing to the democraps and voting for what they put up out of fear that they wont be liked and invited to parties in DC.

Amen brutha
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 1
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Paul said that on many bills the two sides agree on 70-80%. They should pass what they agree on instead of doing nothing.

In you mind does that make him a liberal?

If not why, you keep calling GOP leaders that show any signs of working with the other side as selling out and call them libs.

Your problem is you do not hold the other side to the same standard. Why is so hard to find compromise on the hill? Easy, the Dems in the house and Senate are in lockstep with the POTUS who WILL NOT COMPROMISE! They cannot find common ground that will not get vetoed, Harry Reid will not let legislation come to the floor that he know the POTUS will not sign off on.

Compromise is fine, but it takes both sides and you only ever mention one as needing to bend!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
To libs compromise is voting for whatever they put up to the vote in Congress. Compromise isn't working with republicans to them! I'm sick of republicans cow towing to the democraps and voting for what they put up out of fear that they wont be liked and invited to parties in DC.

I will as you the same question I asked hog.

Do you consider Rand Paul a liberal because he hit the Sunday talk shows suggesting the two side should work together and pass what they agree on ?
 
I will as you the same question I asked hog.

Do you consider Rand Paul a liberal because he hit the Sunday talk shows suggesting the two side should work together and pass what they agree on ?

It depend on what they are agreeing on. Lately the things that they have agreed on haven't been good for the Country.
 
I will as you the same question I asked hog.

Do you consider Rand Paul a liberal because he hit the Sunday talk shows suggesting the two side should work together and pass what they agree on ?

I've asked you two questions without a reply?
 
Paul said that on many bills the two sides agree on 70-80%. They should pass what they agree on instead of doing nothing.

In you mind does that make him a liberal?

If not why, you keep calling GOP leaders that show any signs of working with the other side as selling out and call them libs.

Do you agree with the riders put in on bills going through Congress? Or should the bill be specific to what the name is? I.E. Orange subsidies legislation should have specifics to orange subsidies and not funding for a study of the spotted jumping Oregon field mouse and a bridge in Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top