Utah State

#451
#451
volfan_89 said:
Also am I missing where Dobbs started against USCe? Or where North went out early with an injury vs USCe?

I didn't think so. Wasn't the same players so your argument isn't valid.
Click to expand...

I didn't know they would have been on the field that last Vandy drive
 
#452
#452
CountVolcula said:
I didn't know they would have been on the field that last Vandy drive
Click to expand...

You said the players were the same for that game and they weren't. The defensive players might have been the same. But without North great play in the USCe game we lose. Had Worley been healthy and North not been injured we likely we the vandy game.
 
#456
#456
volfan_89 said:
Also am I missing where Dobbs started against USCe? Or where North went out early with an injury vs USCe?

I didn't think so. Wasn't the same players so your argument isn't valid.
Click to expand...

Yet you fail to mention Shaw going out for crunch time for USCe...

Oh wait, that doesn't matter to you guys.
 
#458
#458
Wylo said:
Yet you fail to mention Shaw going out for crunch time for USCe...

Oh wait, that doesn't matter to you guys.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't because he was hurt because we had him on his ass all day and Dylan Thompson is a pretty good back up, better than any qb on our roster.
 
#459
#459
Wylo said:
Yet you fail to mention Shaw going out for crunch time for USCe...

Oh wait, that doesn't matter to you guys.
Click to expand...

You're right. Shaw's play up to that point had been spectacular and him getting hurt really hurt USCe.
 
#462
#462
Wylo said:
just like USCe closes UT out if Shaw didn't get hurt, right? ?

You can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

Shaw hadn't exactly been lighting up the score board that day so what makes you think that?

There were times this season that spurrier put in their back up over shaw to mix it up so their back up QB isn't that bad.
 
#463
#463
Wylo said:
But this isn't assuming a lot? ?

more one sided arguments by you guys.
Click to expand...

No. It really isn't. If you honestly dont believe if we had Worley and North we wouldn't have scored at least 3 more points then I don't know what to tell you.

It is assuming a lot that Shaw would have undoubtedly led USC on a game winning drive against a D who played their best game of the year by far and had already picked off Shaw once.
 
#467
#467
Wylo said:
Yet you fail to mention Shaw going out for crunch time for USCe...

Oh wait, that doesn't matter to you guys.
Click to expand...


Wouldn't matter to you if he wasn't a part of your argument
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#471
#471
CountVolcula said:
I thought you guys wanted Dobbs?

Wasn't he the next Tee Martin?
Click to expand...

Worley's play up to the UGA wasn't all that great. Can't really blame people for wanting to see the back up play. I was happy with Worley after the peterman experiment.
 
#473
#473
CountVolcula said:
Well enough to have the lead

Plus, if Spurrier hadn't burned those two timeouts trying to draw us offsides, we might be talking about a loss. See, I can assume to
Click to expand...

But that was bad coaching on his part or good coaching by Jones to call Spurrier's bluff.
 
#475
#475
volfan_89 said:
Could at least admit that Worley being out and North going out early effected our chances in a negative way to win that game?
Click to expand...

We were winning that game. If we were losing the whole game, I would say it would have made a difference

Yet, we somehow allowed another game winning drive at the very end

2 games we should have won if our D hadn't went soft in the last 2 minutes
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top