volbeast33
You can count on Carlos!
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 35,624
- Likes
- 108,779
That's what happens when you start 1 for 17 from the floor and finish 7 of 19 from the foul line. You can complain as much as you want about Martin, but if the players hit 35% from the field and made 50% of the foul shots, they win by 10. Simple as that.
I'm sorry didn't mean to sound sensitive like most posters on here. Lol it does kill me how everyone with different views get labeled into categories.
I get people complaing about Martin and have no problem with those who don't think he's the answer. There is evidence for both sides.
However, the idea that he's Wade Houston (wonder that comparison comes from) or even Buzz Peterson is asinine.
I get people complaing about Martin and have no problem with those who don't think he's the answer. There is evidence for both sides.
However, the idea that he's Wade Houston (wonder that comparison comes from) or even Buzz Peterson is asinine.
Buzz took a team to the NCAA tourney and won the NIT. Wade Houston won two road games in the NIT and made the finals of the SEC tourney. As of yet, Martin has not reached their highest achievement.
I get people complaing about Martin and have no problem with those who don't think he's the answer. There is evidence for both sides.
However, the idea that he's Wade Houston (wonder that comparison comes from) or even Buzz Peterson is asinine.
He's not better than Peterson by much and only Dooley is as bad as Houston was.
Martin has both a 20-win and 19-win season to his record at UT. Peterson's high-water mark was 17 wins. He also had a losing season in year one.
Both followed successful periods in UT basketball, so I'd say you're either giving Buzz way to much credit, or not giving Zo nearly enough.