Butch and staff will decide where to play him....pretty sure they know more about that then all the "hey play him here play him there folks".
Never fails to crack me up when we get these posts where everyone has a better ideal about where someone should be played or for that matter even recruited.
:loco:
You want to hear something really funny then? This is a message board. I say he will play CB because VQ does. They seem to be right about everything these days. If he plays S am I going to cry? Hardly. We're all here because we love our Vols (well most of us). I'm just giving positives on why I think he can play a position that he's never played, that he's being recruited to play. If you think that's funny or use the standard idk wtf I'm talking about "I luv deez interwebz coachez" insult then your not worth the time. If nobody had opinions/good things to say, this place would be awful. That's why I stay away from the FF 99% of the time. Hilarious story right?Butch and staff will decide where to play him....pretty sure they know more about that then all the "hey play him here play him there folks".
Never fails to crack me up when we get these posts where everyone has a better ideal about where someone should be played or for that matter even recruited.
:loco:
Butch and staff will decide where to play him....pretty sure they know more about that then all the "hey play him here play him there folks".
Never fails to crack me up when we get these posts where everyone has a better ideal about where someone should be played or for that matter even recruited.
:loco:
Yeah he's definitely got a chance at nickel/dime work, but I hope he develops into a great outside CB with elite CB tackling skillsGaulden at CB IMO. Payne at nickel, also subbing at CB. Toney has the quickness to match up with the slots, but isn't strong enough to tackle well. Gordon was slow and got beat regularly by quick receivers, but tackled well and had good ball hawking skills.
Butch and staff will decide where to play him....pretty sure they know more about that then all the "hey play him here play him there folks".
Never fails to crack me up when we get these posts where everyone has a better ideal about where someone should be played or for that matter even recruited.
:loco:
Yea but the problem is can he acquire the coverage skills like D'Andre Payne already has. Why waste time on developing him to play corner when we have corners in the 2013 and 2014 class. And he does not have ball skills like a true corner you can see that the times he has been matched up with elite wr's. He is top Two Safety in the country, why move him.
I like Gaulden at safety too.
Breakerboy thinks corner.
Either way, he is very talented and should see significant PT early.
I suspect Gaulden will see immediate PT at the Nickel position. He has the physicality you want out of a guy that will have to be a factor in the run game and he has good enough cover skills.
Breaker, remember that your comparison to Millner, Dee played the STAR position for his first couple years and was a backup to the outside guys in case of injuries. I can forsee Gaulden following a similar path, depending on how his body fills out.
Personally speaking, I think Gaulden will have the option to move to safety or corner after Randolph goes to the NFL. I think a safety with great range and the ability to come up and smack players is a more important position these days than another boundary corner. We already have Sutton as our lockdown corner who will be be out an island a lot, i don't think Gauldens unique talent set is optimized putting him at the other boundary. Teams can't really get away from him if he's lined up in the middle at safety and he can negate and save a lot of big plays from happening.
I do agree with you in that i prefer bigger corners that can make an impact in the run game and set the edges and force plays back inside.
That soloman patton screen play for a TD is a prime example of the type of plays that i've seen our corners give up the past 10 years and its quite frustrating. I think some of that can be coached, coleman made a bad decision on that one, he is typically pretty physical and takes good angles in against the runs, he just had bad technique and read the play incorrectly.
Also as we have seen out of elite Db's, you can play early if you have the athleticism and confidence. VHIII, Roberson, the bama Db's year after year, Sutton etc.. can come in and play the boundary corner a lot easier than it is to play safety. Safety requires a lot more understanding of the scheme, responsibilities and checks. I think Gaulden will be a fantastic nickel and then move to safety in time. We should be able to recruit another sutton type soon enough.
Good stuff, TBB! :hi:
On McDowell being underrated, a poster on VQ who works at Bama said awhile back that Kirby Smart thinks McDowell is the best safety in this class. Not sure if true but that's what he posted.
