Crootin Forum: Football Talk VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very interesting text that shocked me this morning. It is from someone that is at every practice and no I won't tell exactly from who but thought it would ring up a good discussion


"Going on record now. Nathan Peterman should be getting all the first team reps NOW. Every practice this happens, they are slowing down the offense."

Wait. Who is slowing down the offense? The coaches? Why? For Peterman? For the other QB's? Would love your analysis on what the text means. A little context or something. Thanks.

Also, I would love to see Peterman win the job.
 
He meant JW was too slow at running the offense.

The pace was something he really struggled with

Not doubting you or your source ( in fact I'm rooting for peterman) but all printed media things keep saying Worley has the best handle on the offense.
 
He meant JW was too slow at running the offense.

The pace was something he really struggled with
Yeah that makes sense too. That's kind of why I got to my poor man's Bo Wallace conclusion. Bo is just not a fit to their scheme IMO
 
It sounds like the staff is giving everyone playing time to find out what they have at every position. Remember, most of these guys they didn't recruit or even see in a camp style setting. My guess is that the last two weeks of fall camp will be when we have a much clearer view of the two deep.
 
It sounds like the staff is giving everyone playing time to find out what they have at every position. Remember, most of these guys they didn't recruit or even see in a camp style setting. My guess is that the last two weeks of fall camp will be when we have a much clearer view of the two deep.

No doubt.
 
100% with you. That's why this was my response



Wow.
That's a curve ball.

So you are telling us the text came from someone who agrees with you that Peterman should be running this offence even before he attended practice.

I would love to see Nate win the job, I would also love to see Worley win the job....I would not even mind if one of he two freshmen won the job....As long at they actually WON it....then it would mean we have the best qb at that position.

I would just like to know from what context the individual sent that text to you????
 
No I don't.

Posting the opinion of an everyday observer of practice is a ridiculous conspiracy theory?

Has he named a starter?

I don't trust you or your "sources". I learned better than to do that with the baseball thread. Your weak attempts to smear Dave Serrano proved to be completely false, totally fabricated. Please don't start this ish with Butch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There really hasn't been much about Peterman, which is why people seem to assume he's dropping down the list. The other three guys seem to be getting praised.

At least for me that's why I assumed he was out of it.
 
It sounds like the staff is giving everyone playing time to find out what they have at every position. Remember, most of these guys they didn't recruit or even see in a camp style setting. My guess is that the last two weeks of fall camp will be when we have a much clearer view of the two deep.

They did recruit Peterman at Cincy and im sure they did their homework on Fergy before letting him keep his scholly and certainly did on Dobbs

hopefully they see what they need to soon so the offense can start to get comfortable with the guy thats going to be at the helm come gametime
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So you are telling us the text came from someone who agrees with you that Peterman should be running this offence even before he attended practice.

I would love to see Nate win the job, I would also love to see Worley win the job....I would not even mind if one of he two frveshmen won the job....As long at they actually WON it....then it would mean we have the best qb at that position.

I would just like to know from what context the individual sent that text to you????


The text came from someone that has attended every practice this camp and his opinion is worth listening to(most would agree with that).

I really have no opinion on who should be the starter. I thought it was a for gone conclusion that JW was the guy. That's why I was shocked
 
and now the typical VN response...no one is questioning that the coaches will make the best decision and that they know more than we the average fan

Oh trust me....This Bruin is questioning the coaches. He is getting quite good at questioning them. It always starts with his "sources".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I don't trust you or your "sources". I learned better than to do that with the baseball thread. Your weak attempts to smear Dave Serrano proved to be completely false, totally fabricated. Please don't start this ish with Butch.

Good post. I personally think Bruin is a troll that likes to get everyone stirred up. I ignored him long ago. Hate that he's quoted so often.

Until I hear from CBJ that Peterman should start, I won't believe he should. My uneducated guess is that CBJ has coached and won more Div I football games than the water boy who is Bruin's source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I don't trust you or your "sources". I learned better than to do that with the baseball thread. Your weak attempts to smear Dave Serrano proved to be completely false, totally fabricated. Please don't start this ish with Butch.

Would you tell me what thread that was in I would like to read the fabrication of mine?
 
I'm not going to worry about who the starting QB will be until we start trying out WRs for the position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top