DC Vol
Agent Orange
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
- Messages
- 11,460
- Likes
- 601
Out of everyone on the offense, I would say that Ainge is one of the least to blame.
What you're saying, Rasputin, is like people calling for Manning to be traded because he had a bad game against New England. For about 3 years straight.
I'm sorry, but that's a bad move. You can't expect this guy to go out there every week and be a total stud. You need to be surrounded by top tier talent in order to do that. And Austin Rogers, with his 4.5 speed is not going to stretch the field, broken finger or not. In order for the "deep pass" that everyone is having a wet dream over to work, you have to have a palpable receiver on the other end. You can't blame Ainge for putting it on the money and the receiver dropping the pass.
The WRs have to know their routes, execute their routes, know their audible routes, execute the audible routes, catch the ball, and not be afraid to be hit. I've seen an almost pathetic, and inconsistent attempt out of all of them on almost all of those points. The line probably could not hold up for Ainge to read and throw the deep route anyway. You're not crediting him for only giving up one sack all season. And that was early in the Cal game. He has done a fairly good job reading the field. I would be worried about a receiver not catching the ball correctly and it popping up and getting intercepted. And how do we know that the INT he threw in FLA (his only one this season) was not the fault of the WR? And one last thing, our passing game, at this point (personnel and finger and probably line) are built to control the game and not put up gaudy numbers. They've been trying to play catch up, and I'll say this flat out, we DO NOT have the WRs for that. I think Ainge could be VERY successful with that passing attack at another school, or even this year with Meachem back.
What you're saying, Rasputin, is like people calling for Manning to be traded because he had a bad game against New England. For about 3 years straight.
I'm sorry, but that's a bad move. You can't expect this guy to go out there every week and be a total stud. You need to be surrounded by top tier talent in order to do that. And Austin Rogers, with his 4.5 speed is not going to stretch the field, broken finger or not. In order for the "deep pass" that everyone is having a wet dream over to work, you have to have a palpable receiver on the other end. You can't blame Ainge for putting it on the money and the receiver dropping the pass.
The WRs have to know their routes, execute their routes, know their audible routes, execute the audible routes, catch the ball, and not be afraid to be hit. I've seen an almost pathetic, and inconsistent attempt out of all of them on almost all of those points. The line probably could not hold up for Ainge to read and throw the deep route anyway. You're not crediting him for only giving up one sack all season. And that was early in the Cal game. He has done a fairly good job reading the field. I would be worried about a receiver not catching the ball correctly and it popping up and getting intercepted. And how do we know that the INT he threw in FLA (his only one this season) was not the fault of the WR? And one last thing, our passing game, at this point (personnel and finger and probably line) are built to control the game and not put up gaudy numbers. They've been trying to play catch up, and I'll say this flat out, we DO NOT have the WRs for that. I think Ainge could be VERY successful with that passing attack at another school, or even this year with Meachem back.