Recruiting Forum: Football Talk II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, but everyone knew Dooley wanted a full time RB coach. I guess you could have given it to Hinshaw and let Tee coach WR, but Hinshaw has no experience there either.

There is other options Dooley could have done. Chaney as OL coach, Hinshaw as qb coach, Tee as receiver coach, and graham as rb coach.

Dooley could have handled special teams himself like Frank Beamer, which would have allowed for another coach instead of Coiner.

Those are just 2 examples.
 
besides Tee being a former great player, why does everyone want him on staff so bad?

what else does he do?

He is an elite recruiter. A top 25 recruiter at Kentucky is impressive.

Chris Matthews numbers tripled when he got there and Randall Cobb's doubled when he was there.

At USC, I heard Kiffin is very hands on with receivers, and actually heard he is a very good reciever coach. He probably has learned even more from Kiffin.

Recruiting is the main thing tho. He has big name value in state.
 
top 25 recruiter by whose standards?

that 2011 class he signed was no better than any other recruits in the SEC

hell, both Chaney and Hinshaw signed better guys than tee martin did'

Rivals Hyped tee Martin up as a Big time recruiter, and he may be (esp. at USC) ... but the kids he recruited at Kentucky do not equate to big time

other than that, his WR coaching... well you can keep that.
 
Last edited:
The Gruden thread just exploded with excitement. Just sayin

Yep, I noticed. Their explosion coupled with more media chatter has me slightly more optimistic than before. I'm a doubter, but I'm at least comfortable talking about the possibility with folks at work. Gruden would be awesome if we got him.
 
top 25 recruiter by whose standards?

that 2011 class he signed was no better than any other recruits in the SEC

hell, both Chaney and Hinshaw signed better guys than tee martin did'

Rivals Hyped tee Martin up as a Big time recruiter, and he may be (esp. at USC) ... but the kids he recruited at Kentucky do not equate to big time

other than that, his WR coaching... well you can keep that.

He was named a top 25 recruiter by ESPN.

He was recruiting at UK. You are really limited to what you can sell to a recruit. He was a big reason USC got Jason Hatcher and Jalen Ramsey. Him and Jay Graham would be unbelievable together in the state of Tn.

People close to him say he is a relentless recruiter, he eats and sleeps recruiting.

I admit its really hard to tell how well of a receiver's coach he is, and I really have no idea how good of a position coach he is, but his receivers did very well for him at UK.
 
Yep, I noticed. Their explosion coupled with more media chatter has me slightly more optimistic than before. I'm a doubter, but I'm at least comfortable talking about the possibility with folks at work. Gruden would be awesome if we got him.

If a MOU has been signed like they say then there's still a possibility of it not happening but I would think a signed MOU would put us closer to getting Gruden than not. I'm not a 100% believer but I'm fairly close to it. If it happens, I can't wait to see the recruits who all the sudden have an interest in UT.
 
If a MOU has been signed like they say then there's still a possibility of it not happening but I would think a signed MOU would put us closer to getting Gruden than not. I'm not a 100% believer but I'm fairly close to it. If it happens, I can't wait to see the recruits who all the sudden have an interest in UT.

Sorry MOU?
 
Thanks. That makes it clear as mud. lol

An outline of principles, money, etc. saying what will be in place for a contract.

It is a pre-contract, if you will.

You can back out of such a thing, but it is in poor taste to do so, since you have already agreed in principle.
 
An outline of principles, money, etc. saying what will be in place for a contract.

It is a pre-contract, if you will.

You can back out of such a thing, but it is in poor taste to do so, since you have already agreed in principle.

So Gruden is supposed have one of these? or just a what if type thing? I mean did this come from a "source" or something?
 
Now its an argument between sophomores telling a youth pastor gruden's kids are being enrolled at webb vs the upper classmen saying no. My money is on the church kids lying.
 
An outline of principles, money, etc. saying what will be in place for a contract.

It is a pre-contract, if you will.

You can back out of such a thing, but it is in poor taste to do so, since you have already agreed in principle.

what's your opinion of the situation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top