I just cant understand the thinking behind this. Why root against us to lose? If things are as bad as everyone says then the loss will happen anyways. Why wish for it?
After the bama game i was very down on this team and dooley. I even made a thread on here admitting the "negavols" had been right and that dooley needs to go. It was an emotional reaction i regret making. I still feel this team is better than their record and i still have hope for us IF we win out and win a bowl game. Lose in november, regardless of situation or opponent, and thats it.
i don't know man. if given another 3 years, i think it's an even money bet that dooley can instruct the team on how many men are supposed to be on the field and where they are supposed to line up.
after consulting a farmer's almanac, you can't water bamboo that quickly.
it's science
I always think it's funny when people have to mention they are an alum of the university. Like it means their opinion is more important than someone that didn't go to UT. News flash....I don't care that you're an alum.
In general I agree with this. For example, the Bruce Pearl arguments a couple of years ago were mostly split right down the middle -- alums wanted Pearl gone over the ethics violations; non-alums wanted to figure a way to keep him around. I would rather lose games than do things the wrong way.
Having said that, I have two degrees from UTK and I'd like to see Dooley fired tomorrow morning.
Course, I guess if championships are what you are after, you guys are going to get rid of Muschump this year right?
I'll be honest, if it means cutting off the leg to save the body. Then yes. I would not actually root for the other team to win and be disappointed if we win.. but if it is the difference in keeping a dumbass and hiring a winner... Then definitely. Sometimes you have to think big picture.
See, I don't even get mad. When Clowney stripped the ball at the end, I laughed.
Want us to lose a game if it means the difference between starting over with a homerun hire or returning a coach that has proven to be unqualified for he job? In other words, if you knew winning Saturday meant Dooley returns regardless of what happens the rest of the year, and losing meant he would be dismissed at years end to be replaced with Gruden or whoever you consider a homerun hire, could you want us to lose??
I have to admit, it's debatable for me with no clear answer.
I understand, my expectations are much lower than they were 10 years ago. There were times when I would be pissed off for days after a loss. Now I can go on with my day as if nothing happened after a loss. I do feel like all programs go through this and our day is coming again.
Dude, it's the end of October. By this point, we are what our record says we are. We're worse than all the relevant teams in the conference, but, pending November results, we might be better than a couple of the bottom feeders that we've basically become.
I agree to an extent, but its hard not to see all the improvement and not think how close we really are. We were a fourth quarter drive away from beating two teams that have been ranked in the top five this year, and if not for a fumble we would have beaten a top 15 as well. I dont know if dooley can get us over that hump, but i certainly dont think its as bad as what some are trying to say.