Anyone who thinks Dooley will be fired because of a loss to SC is delirious.
Dooley will not be fired b/c of any particular loss to any particular team in any particular season, nor will any particular win over any particular team save his job. Any AD who made decisions like that would be a moron and dangerous to his department and university, and would be better equipped to run a charity digging water wells in Africa than a major athletic department.
Uh...no. We wouldn't have.
Correct, we wouldn't have gotten an A+ coach at that time b/c it was late January. What should have happened, and this is not good but the best option considering the circumstances, is to use an interim coach for the upcoming season with the intent of hiring an A+ coach at the end of that season when great candidates are available. I've started another thread on this site and another one that includes 1) a list of the schools that used interims in 2010, and 2) a list of the coaches that changed jobs at the end of that season as well. Hard not to see that in retrospect we would've been better off to go that route.
Only an idiot would jump the gun and hire a minor level coach with a losing record and give him millions of dollars on short notice just b/c he was willing to walk out on his school at the last minute (as we were, at that moment, criticizing Kiffin for doing to us). Any AD who makes decisions like that would be better equipped to run...ahhh nevermind already said that.
I honestly don't see the upside of doing this during the season. Why not let the team finish the season, then make a change if we feel it best.
Normally that is the best course of action, but we are not at "normal" now. There are extenuating circumstances that make this a last-resort scenario. The whole program and fanbase are so sharply divided, the team is in KY-like turmoil (again), Coach Dooley has lost the program/team and it's spiraling out of control now quickly. This program needs extraordinary intervention now, so this situation seems to justify going ahead and doing it now to stop the bleeding and let everybody breathe.
This, I am willing to say that 75% of the posters on here have no idea the size of a financial hole UT is in right now. They do not have enough reserves to simply buy him and his staff out right now. A BIG time donor will have to come in and do a bail out.
All the more reason why they HAVE to make a change. The AD is bleeding money now, and will continue to do so until something is done to turn things around. Buyouts are expensive, and no doubt there is a price to be paid for the ineptness of Mike Hamilton in handing out sweetheart deals that were one-sided in favor of (insert Jimmy Sexton client here) and did not protect the university. Any AD who gave out contracts like that would be better...oops there I go again.
The university simply can NOT afford to keep losing all those seats and all that dadgum popcorn money any longer. Keeping this divisive coach is costing more than cutting him loose, by far.
Some people assume that buyout money has to be paid immediately upon termination, and that their would be no return on investment with the new coach if the right hire is made. In this case UT can't afford to NOT make a change, even if it's to relieve Dooley after the SC game and appoint an interim to finish out the season.