BigOrangeFanatic
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,396
- Likes
- 10,288
He's the first person in nearly 7 years on the forum that I've put on ignore. I hate doing that, and typically am critical of those that do. After multiple duplicate posts I realized not trying to affect the debate, but trying to curtail it.
You'd likely lose that bet. The announcement likely will come after the USCe game. That is when we historically let our failing coaches go.
He may finish out the year, but more than likely we'll see an interim coach.
His prior record has everything to do with how qualified he is to run this program. It's a sliding scale between the WAC and SEC, I understand that. But a lack of success at one, and a pattern of similar recurring onfield difficulties, may be indicative of a low ceiling of performance.
We'll all know at the end if October. There will be many more believers at that time. It takes some people longer to believe what they see.
You'll come around.
I have said for a long time that I will reserve my judgement on DD till after year 3 based on what he inherited, that has not changed.
It will be a cold day in hell if I ever become a Grudenite, I can assure you of that. Gruden carries to many unknowns and has not shown me anything that he could be a successful HC. I think he would be Bill Battle 2.0 in the fact he could win with other coaches players but once his players hit the field it would be a horrific and boring game to watch.
Bill Battle atleast had more than 7 wins in a year.I have said for a long time that I will reserve my judgement on DD till after year 3 based on what he inherited, that has not changed.
It will be a cold day in hell if I ever become a Grudenite, I can assure you of that. Gruden carries to many unknowns and has not shown me anything that he could be a successful HC. I think he would be Bill Battle 2.0 in the fact he could win with other coaches players but once his players hit the field it would be a horrific and boring game to watch.
Im less willing to bet on whether he' d finish the season than I would be to say he' ll be back after a 7-5 finish with a blowout loss to Bama
Im less willing to bet on whether he' d finish the season than I would be to say he' ll be back after a 7-5 finish with a blowout loss to Bama
I have said for a long time that I will reserve my judgement on DD till after year 3 based on what he inherited, that has not changed.
It will be a cold day in hell if I ever become a Grudenite, I can assure you of that. Gruden carries to many unknowns and has not shown me anything that he could be a successful HC. I think he would be Bill Battle 2.0 in the fact he could win with other coaches players but once his players hit the field it would be a horrific and boring game to watch.
I have said for a long time that I will reserve my judgement on DD till after year 3 based on what he inherited, that has not changed.
It will be a cold day in hell if I ever become a Grudenite, I can assure you of that. Gruden carries to many unknowns and has not shown me anything that he could be a successful HC. I think he would be Bill Battle 2.0 in the fact he could win with other coaches players but once his players hit the field it would be a horrific and boring game to watch.
My guy says he's solid with Hart for one more year.
I guessing Hart expects to beat certain teams. It would blow my mind if he stays only winning 7.
If you've read any of my posts you know I have zero confidence in the UT administration to get this right.
Bill Battle atleast had more than 7 wins in a year.
For BOF
So I don't get put on ignore for being repetitive
I'm not hear to convince you about Gruden. We can all have an opinion on the answer to the replacement question.
That being said, I find it interesting that the people who claim that he only won with someone else's players at TB, refuse to give him credit for building the team that he faced in the Super Bowl. Shouldn't that cut both ways?
It is not like some of us older fans have not been thru this before and as I have stated numerous times the SEC was no where near the level of competition then as it is now.
