titanvolsfan1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2009
- Messages
- 460
- Likes
- 2
The NegaVols have scientific proof that chat boards has little to no effect on recruits, they also have plans that would create world peace and solve the economy in this country.
It's not that recruits and their families may see the stuff that's posted on message boards, I'm sure they do. But surely they are smart enough to take it all with a grain of salt, because every fanbase has it's crazies. You guys act like UT is the only team with message board posters who aren't happy with the coach, which simply isn't the case.
you have to remember that they are 17 and 18 year olds, and yes they are gullible enough to believe anything, that's why they are so easy to pull tricks on.
It's not that recruits and their families may see the stuff that's posted on message boards, I'm sure they do. But surely they are smart enough to take it all with a grain of salt, because every fanbase has it's crazies. You guys act like UT is the only team with message board posters who aren't happy with the coach, which simply isn't the case.
The bold part is very comical, take away Gannon and Gruden has the reputation of the coach who destroys QB's careers.
His connections in the NFL? His track record? The Bucs sucked each year after they won the SB. I am not a star gazer or a big fan of Gruden but it is not up to me who is hired or fired at UT.
This thread is ridiculous. If Dooley wins 9-10 games, there is no way we hire someone else after the season. He will get an extension as he would have won more than we have since 2007. That would be an extremely successful rebuilding job. You don't get rid of a coach that wins for another transition and potential. Charlie Weis was supposed to be a big success in college and he was an absolute bust. If we have another losing season, then we can have this conversation. We have a chance to be a good team. Let's play some games first and cheer for them to be successful.
So do you honestly think the only message board they visit would be UT's? That would be the only way they could possibly think that its only Vol fans who are unhappy with their coach.
Gruden is good at breaking down game film and pointing out a players strengths and weaknesses, that has zero to do with recruiting. Some guys know the game and are good at breaking it down but have difficulties in translating that knowledge on the field during a game. I am not convinced that Grudens coaching habits and his unknown factor to recruit would make him a great candidate to lead the Vols.
Given the situation that Dooley inherited, I still don't know for sure that Dooley isn't better than Jon Gruden. Replacing Dooley might be a huge mistake. I, for one, think that Dooley has done quite an excellent job with the circumstances thrown at him. He may not pan out (the jury is still out for me), but I still believe that he could end up being special.
I posted this question on another board, but I wanted to get some feedback here. This is an offseason thread, and I'm just looking for discussion. This is not a "Fire Dooley" thread. Inevitably, someone will take this for more than just a speculation pretend time thread, and I will laugh at them.
Let's say we have a good to great year, excluding a national championship win. 9-10 wins, win the East, win our Bowl. Jon Gruden (or another equally big coaching name, but I'm using Gruden) is on the market. Dave Hart approaches Gruden and he accepts the job & CDD is bought out. If you don't want to think Gruden, picture a homerun, Saban-to-Alabama type of hire. There is very little room to argue that the coach is superior in terms of coaching acumen, recruiting, etc. The coach also views UT as a destination job. No Lane Kiffin repeat.
Keeping in mind all of the above, answer the following:
1) How unlikely is it that we hire a superior coach even if CDD has a successful season? Is there precedent for this?
2) Would you be on board with the hire? Why or why not?
3) What effect would you see it having on our roster & recruiting class? Feel free to break it down by FR, SO, JR, SR, or however.
4) What would the new coach do right away to prove that this was the right move?
I'll start.
1) I'll admit that the scenario is unlikely. If Dooley were to win a NC it becomes impossible, however that is equally unlikely. But! Dooley is not Hart's hire. CDD has not endeared himself to the fan base yet. I won't go through the laundry list of coaching mistakes. He also has pissed off some former players. As for precedent, I don't know of a coach having a good year and being let go purely for upgrade reasons.
2) Of course I would be on board with the hire. I personally see this as the best possible year we could have. Win a lot of meaningful games and land Jon Gruden. The buzz is back at UT. Opposing teams respect/fear us again. We gain all of this by the name of our coach & his ability, not by shenanigans and ESPN stories a la Kiffin.
3) I think we see very little attrition. My next point will expand on this. Also, I've heard CDD is not the most popular guy.
4) Since we had a successful year, the entire staff would be retained, minus Jim Chaney and any clear non-performers, which should be minimal. This gives continuity to the current players. This also maintains our current recruiting class, and only serves to improve it. The defense remains unchanged. Gruden can bring in an OC, but his offense is installed which is a huge win. Our '14 recruiting class starts shaping up to be Top 3 in the nation.
All that said, I'm geared up for a great year. David Ricky Rogers #21, best WR in the nation.