Bassmanbruno
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 21,003
- Likes
- 1
Bama wasn't near as depleted as we were at the time. You would need to compare losing Hightower plus 3 more of whoever their best players were, then also put them against the type of competition we played. The combined record of the teams we played against in the West was 35-4 and two of those played in the NC game.
True, but they still nutted up. I'm sorry, if we are blaming the season and said it was lost because our WR tore his knee, then there are other issues. Yeah, he's a damn good wide receiver. We still shouldn't be hearing excuses about his injury in freakin March.
Hunter is the most important player on the team. The players still played hard until Bray got hurt. The players fought back in the UF game and they played hard against UGA. Once Bray went down, I think that's when they lost hope. I remember reading about how the life was just sucked out of them when Bray went down.
Okay, I need to say something here.
Losing Bray sucked. Hard. I'm not denying that. But with basketball, you got only 12-13 players. It's not the same. You got plenty of players that can help step up. You lost your best player, it's a completely different animal. Yeah, losing Hunter sucked. We shouldn't be saying at the end of the season "Oh, this season was lost when Hunter got hurt." Alabama lost Dont'a Hightower for 2009. Did that hold them back? Hell no. They nutted up and played ball. Saban's team was able to overcome adversity, while Dooley's team folded.
Hunter is not the most important player on the team. It's Bray, then (before being kicked off) J.J., and then Hunter.
And you don't remember the first half of that game when they laid down? Sure they came back. Helped Florida went completely conservative and we threw 50 times.
Hunter is the most important. He is the most talented player on the field. He makes everyone around him much better. Hunter opens up so much for you on offense.
They did and then they fought back and turned it into a ball game. UF could have easily put up 35 in the first half but the defense played hard to hold them to field goals which was crucial. We were only down by 9, I think, at half time and it should have been a lot worse. The team never gave up.
I have to disagree. He is the most talented player we have, but if we can receive a snap and get the ball to him, he's useless.
Worley and Simms would have been able to get him the ball. He would have gotten open. Bray got shut down against UGA. Not one player from UGA would have shut down Hunter. He would have opened up a lot more for our other recievers and our run game would have been a lot better because their main focus was Hunter.
He makes a difference, no doubt. But, I stand by my point. You have to get the ball to them. Simms couldn't get the ball to a receiver in ghost coverage drills. I know it was his freshman year, but I didn't see a whole lot in Worley to make as confident of a declaration as you did.
It doesn't matter about the qb. Of course Bray is going to be way more successful than Simms and Worley, but Hunter would have gotten 100 yards in a lot of games with or without Bray. Simms and Worley would have easily gotten Hunter tha ball.
I think we need a catch all thread for the "he's on my ignore list." List
Amen. It's one of the most ignorant aspects of this site. I have been on my soapbox about it for a while. It's like it's a competition. Too bad for those guys that life doesn't have an ignore button. What's the rationale for announcing an ignore or even ignoring period?
'I'm gonna show all those folks that I disagree with. I'll announce that I have ignored them. Yeah, that'll show 'em.' Smh. The height of closed minded immaturity.
Hunter is the most important. He is the most talented player on the field. He makes everyone around him much better. Hunter opens up so much for you on offense.
They did and then they fought back and turned it into a ball game. UF could have easily put up 35 in the first half but the defense played hard to hold them to field goals which was crucial. We were only down by 9, I think, at half time and it should have been a lot worse. The team never gave up.
Doesn't matter about the QB? Come on. No way you believe that. Every play starts with the QB. I will agree that the QB doesn't have to be a super star all the time, but doesn't matter?
Serious question. Have you ever coached the game in competitive school ball?
Should you feel slighted if you have never made such a list?
To my knowledge I have never been threatened with such a move. May be time to go controversial and see what happens.