Another THP Officer shows his true colors

#51
#51
Cdywolfe said:
I would also like to respond to the multiple adolesent insults I have recieved in this thread.

I have never once, nor will I, attempt to justify what the cop did. He was wrong and got what he deserved. It is actually debatable that he got far less than what he deserved.

I'm just not gonna sit here and pretend the man (he was 20 y/o... not a child) driving 40 over the limit, while drunk and evading the police is some kind of victim.
Click to expand...

Who's defending the kid? Looks like the story gives evidence of two criminals imo, but one of them is paid to not be one.
 
#57
#57
Slydell said:
I've noticed the drunk driver reference in this thread, obviously. I didn't see the original story when this happened. Was the determination of the driver being intoxicated made during the autopsy? If so, what was the level that was found?
Click to expand...

That "evidence" was probably leaked by KPD PR department to run interference. Didn't want it to be a big story since this same POS ran someone else off the road to their death a year earlier.
 
#59
#59
bamacheats said:
No need to blame an entire organization on one man's actions when there's a gigantic sample size. It's evidenced by posts made by LE. The way LE thinks is the problem. Something as obviously immoral as driving past a wreck is instantly sugarcoated by many LE with their myriad of "what ifs" and "he should've".
Click to expand...

Define many
 
Last edited:
#60
#60
bamacheats said:
The LE posters here is just an immediate example. However, in the small sample size of VN, the majority of LE posters share the same point of view.

The primary problem with LE everywhere is that it comes with way too much risk, responsibility, and stress for what little it pays. This is not a good recipe for attracting the brightest guys in the class. It's insulting to me that we ask someone to protect us and get in harms way yet don't compensate the job adequately. That leaves a bunch of guys with a Napoleon complex to sign up because the authority is personally more valuable than fair compensation.
Click to expand...

Intelligence level? Most places require an associates or 4 year degree to apply.
 
Last edited:
#63
#63
OrangeEmpire said:
bamacheats said:
Intelligence level? Most places require an associates or 4 year degree to apply.
Click to expand...

A college degree is not an indicator of intelligence. A degree means that you at least achieved 1 point above failing.

Unfortunately, you overlooked the point; an intelligent person would conclude that risking life for the salary comparable to a car salesman is not a desirable job. Unless authority over others is really valuable.
Click to expand...
 
#66
#66
I think Bama's relatively on the money here.

The cop didn't know the kid was dead when he deliberately drove past the wreck. The fact that he died on impact is beside the point. I'm even okay with him getting sued for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67
milohimself said:
I think Bama's relatively on the money here.

The cop didn't know the kid was dead when he deliberately drove past the wreck. The fact that he died on impact is beside the point. I'm even okay with him getting sued for it.
Click to expand...

:hi:

You sure you're not just having sympathy for a beleaguered Knicks fan?
 
#68
#68
milohimself said:
The cop didn't know the kid was dead when he deliberately drove past the wreck. The fact that he died on impact is beside the point. [/QUOTE/]

That was not the point that BAMA was making. He said that if the trooper had stopped the kid wouldnt have died. That is simply not true, if the article is correct, It stated that he died on impact. The question is since the Trooper had no idea that the kid had already deceased WHY didnt he stop? Its a morality issue with the trooper not a question of whether the kid would have died or not. And it is definitely a despicable thing to drive by, especially for a trooper.

I dont really know how I feel about the lawsuit one way or other. I mean I guess the kid ran, and would have died even if the trooper stopped so not real sure how one can argue that its a wrongful death suit.

It remains that this is a sad situation, and we should try everything to be respectful to the families.
Click to expand...
 
#69
#69
OsbourneBROS83 said:
milohimself said:
The cop didn't know the kid was dead when he deliberately drove past the wreck. The fact that he died on impact is beside the point. [/QUOTE/]

That was not the point that BAMA was making. He said that if the trooper had stopped the kid wouldnt have died. That is simply not true, if the article is correct, It stated that he died on impact. The question is since the Trooper had no idea that the kid had already deceased WHY didnt he stop? Its a morality issue with the trooper not a question of whether the kid would have died or not. And it is definitely a despicable thing to drive by, especially for a trooper.

I dont really know how I feel about the lawsuit one way or other. I mean I guess the kid ran, and would have died even if the trooper stopped so not real sure how one can argue that its a wrongful death suit.

It remains that this is a sad situation, and we should try everything to be respectful to the families.
Click to expand...

Link?

I recall saying the pos should have tried to pull the kid from the wreck to prosecute for his crimes. Cop had no way of knowing whether he was dead or not.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#70
#70
milohimself said:
I think Bama's relatively on the money here.

The cop didn't know the kid was dead when he deliberately drove past the wreck. The fact that he died on impact is beside the point. I'm even okay with him getting sued for it.
Click to expand...

so who's at fault for the kids death?
 
Last edited:
#71
#71
bamacheats said:
That "evidence" was probably leaked by KPD PR department to run interference. Didn't want it to be a big story since this same POS ran someone else off the road to their death a year earlier.
Click to expand...

Perhaps I misread the article, but how does chasing someone who broke the law and who continues to avoid pulling over, equate to running someone off of the road to their death?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#73
#73
bamacheats said:
OsbourneBROS83 said:
Link?

I recall saying the pos should have tried to pull the kid from the wreck to prosecute for his crimes. Cop had no way of knowing whether he was dead or not.
Click to expand...

If I recall you have to ALIVE to be prosecuted so yea you were essentially saying that if he would have stopped the kid would be alive


KEEP UP WITH YOUR OWN ARGUMENTS
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#74
#74
After 2 pages of arguing, I still have no idea where either of you stand. Well done, fellas.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top