Starters That Kiffin Recruited

#252
#252
chavisut said:
See bold.
Click to expand...

Stats are hollow. Yo, yo, yo!

Or just yo-yo for short. :crazy:

You can't spin away that those players would all be starters / contributors on this Vol team. And there are more of them - that actually wore the uniform that would be the same. That's before we go into the ones on the watch lists, the ones the NFL scouts have an eye on, etc.

Farce from top to bottom from the OP and his hacked account to all the candle-lighters and their quite entertaining attempts to rationalize the absolutely irrational. Namely, their belief system of:

Kiffin >> Tennessee >> Neyland > Fulmer.
 
#255
#255
utgibbs said:
Stats are hollow. Yo, yo, yo!

Or just yo-yo for short. :crazy:

You can't spin away that those players would all be starters / contributors on this Vol team. And there are more of them - that actually wore the uniform that would be the same. That's before we go into the ones on the watch lists, the ones the NFL scouts have an eye on, etc.

Farce from top to bottom from the OP and his hacked account to all the candle-lighters and their quite entertaining attempts to rationalize the absolutely irrational. Namely, their belief system of:

Kiffin >> Tennessee >> Neyland > Fulmer.
Click to expand...

What's the point of citing the 3/4 of that belief system that's right?
 
#256
#256
Incipient said:
What's the point of citing the 3/4 of that belief system that's right?
Click to expand...

Well, it accentuates exactly how wrong they are given the first part of the logical statement.

But these nihilists and candle-lighters are so bad, I have no doubt they actually believe something more like this:

Kiffin >> Tennessee >> YawYaw >> Fulmer.

so divorced are they from the real world outside the back door.
 
#258
#258
VKAman said:
Their conversation was basically, "Still coming? Yep? Great, let's tell everyone." Give Dooley credit for that if you want, but the sequence of events would have been the same for literally any coach we hired as long as he wasn't an obvious complete buffoon.
Click to expand...

And you have proof of this? It was all Kiffins doing and had nothing to do with Dooley?

You're such a sheep
 
#259
#259
coachkd said:
Whatever you say!? Still zero credibility! Thank God the Mods gave us the ignore button!!
Click to expand...

Couldnt have said it better. The ignore feature is absolutely beautiful, you dont even have to waste a second with the nonsense posted by people like the OP.
 
#265
#265
Sorry for the delete Bearcat . . . but it feels like my head is going to explode every time I see that video.
 
#266
#266
utgibbs said:
Well, it accentuates exactly how wrong they are given the first part of the logical statement.

But these nihilists and candle-lighters are so bad, I have no doubt they actually believe something more like this:

Kiffin >> Tennessee >> YawYaw >> Fulmer.

so divorced are they from the real world outside the back door.
Click to expand...

You're wrong, per usual.
 
#267
#267
GAVol said:
Sorry for the delete Bearcat . . . but it feels like my head is going to explode every time I see that video.
Click to expand...
Come on bro, the vid is my point, it is an example of the type of people that personally want to burn Lane Kiffin's house down.
 
#268
#268
utgibbs said:
Actually, I threw Kiffin a bone trying to keep it from looking as gawd-awful as it is. Once utchavis made his unfortunate statement (trying to beef up the Kiffin numbers) it became academic at that point, even for the candle-lighters.

When yawyaw picked up the phone, they were no longer Kiffin recruits. That I have been generous and still give Kiffin Bray et al was my perogative. That the EEs committed to TN and its traditions best encapsulated by Robert Neyland is exactly the kind of somewhat surrealism we've endured since the Hambone Experiment.

But we know, thanks to your nihilism, what the candle-lighters believe:

Kiffin >> Tennessee >> Neyland.

Thanks for exposing your hand this thread. Maybe you can PM hatvol for the best method of cyberspace hari-kari?
Click to expand...

So... based on all this, how many players do you give to Dooley?

I only ask, because if all those EEs came to play for Tennessee and tradition, and not Kiffin... how many came to play for Tennessee and tradition... and not Dooley?

To simplify for you, are you saying Dooley is bigger than Tennessee, or in your style:

Dooley >> Tennessee >> Neyland.

?
 
#269
#269
fl0at said:
So... based on all this, how many players do you give to Dooley?

I only ask, because if all those EEs came to play for Tennessee and tradition, and not Kiffin... how many came to play for Tennessee and tradition... and not Dooley?

To simplify for you, are you saying Dooley is bigger than Tennessee, or in your style:

Dooley >> Tennessee >> Neyland.

?
Click to expand...

His style is more:

Fulmer>>>Tennessee>>>Neyland>>>Dooley
 
#270
#270
tvolsfan said:
His style is more:

Fulmer>>>Tennessee>>>Neyland>>>Dooley
Click to expand...


I was thinking he would spout off about how Dooley represents tradition and all the things that make Tennessee great, therefore:

Fulmer >>> Dooley == Tennessee == Neyland

Or, at the very least, that since we were only talking about EEs, that only EEs play for Tennessee and tradition.

Everyone else just plays for the coach...
 
#272
#272
fl0at said:
So... based on all this, how many players do you give to Dooley?

I only ask, because if all those EEs came to play for Tennessee and tradition, and not Kiffin... how many came to play for Tennessee and tradition... and not Dooley?

To simplify for you, are you saying Dooley is bigger than Tennessee, or in your style:

Dooley >> Tennessee >> Neyland.

?
Click to expand...

I gave the EEs to Kiffin, but no one has to do so. These are special, almost surreal circumstances. A coach basically called the EEs, told them not to go to class, to follow them West.

It's just that simple.

Let's turn it around: Why did they stay at Tennessee if they came to play for said coach? Let me hear your answer to that. I have a feeling, you are going to have to tread carefully, and you are going to rethink the first thing you write knowing exactly who you will get grouped with.

Because I like to throw overmatched opponents a bone, I give them the EEs.

As Vegas has shown in glorious technicolor - Kiffin still sucks when you throw them a bone. And as I've been saying for a long time, if we had Fulmer recruits / guys who actually wore the orange still here, we don't have to worry about being relevant again. And I was also among the first to say Dooley did more in his first two weeks than Kiffin and co.

And I've been proven right as rain.

Finally, Dooley is uber-bourgeois. I don't gravitate naturally to him. But what distinguishes him WAY beyond his predecessor (no matter what happens) is that he respects the traditions, the history, and what they stand for and what they mean to the fanbase.
 
Last edited:
#273
#273
Yes, we were clearly on the rise with Fulmer as you've shown with your list of stud college athletes
 
#274
#274
the whole basis for this thread is flawed. the kiffin recruits are older,of course there will be more of them starting.if it werent for the coaching change there would be more from fulmers class. dooleys kids arent starting....yet.this will change. kiffin recruited a few good players we get it!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#275
#275
thunder5 said:
And you have proof of this? It was all Kiffins doing and had nothing to do with Dooley?

You're such a sheep
Click to expand...

Sheeplike is automatically siding with the guy that's here now, and believing that Dooley could flip a commit in 5 days right before NSD. I'm guessing you think we came out of nowhere for Da'Rick as well?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top