2026 Vols Transfer Portal Thread

He said he gave a hint. Earlier, he said he thought we'd add a "so-so center". I think I'm probably too stupid to solve the riddle. I don't see a top 400 Center where that makes sense. Or maybe that wasn't even the hint. I mean, one time I did one of those real-life puzzle adventures where you have to drive around a city solving the next clue to figure out where to go next. One of the clues referenced reindeer poop. I had no idea what that meant, but in the vicinity of that clue I found a peppermint on the ground. I thought that must be it and got really excited. Turns out it was just a random peppermint on the ground probably left by a homeless person. So yeah, I'm not the best at solving riddles...
Noticed two posts about a defensive post/5 today. Doubt we'll see a name spelled backwards....
 
Have you watched his highlights. The dude has a nice stroke from 3 and can take a guy off the bounce. For an underclassman with talent around him could have better stats. You could do a lot worse than Braedan. I say if its him bring him on board. The guy is a gamer.
That’s definitely encouraging. I didn’t know he could shoot. I thought we were looking for more a defender and not really scoring at that spot tho?
 
Defense although obviously important is something that can be taught with scheme and effort. Lundblade will never be Mashack but who's to see he can't be as serviceable as Vescovi?
Yeah, not saying I agree w his method but that’s why. I’d much rather have Jokic than Gobert on my team for a reason
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaz-Vol
I wanted Armani Mighty as a depth piece. I was hoping the Earl Grant connection would bring him in.

I would settle for Luke Bamgboye, Bowen or either of the LSU guys.
 
Thanks. Wish that list expanded further than top 100...Considering there are thousands of players though I'd say JP is in the top 25% of 2 point shooting.
75th percentile is respectable but definitely not great imo. I bet that percentile drops if you are able to filter out everyone shorter than 6’11” too 🤷‍♂️
 
Probably so, if Nate wasn’t lol, no other options. You might wanna look up how many game winners Dai Dai has, it’s more than Nate.
I think some are underestimating the value Dai Dai brings. He wants the ball with five seconds on the clcok - down one.

Plus, Ament ekevated his game in what, mid Jan? And then he got injured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77
You're good bro. Let's dive deeper. I want us all to know this stuff better.

Don't you feel like minutes per game should be included since we're talking about scoring opportunities? Because there's a 26 minute per game, 6.2 ppg void in your scoring opportunities calculation with Bishop Boswell leaving. I feel like our calculations should include a guy who's on the court 65% of the game. I'm gonna drop some minutes per game and i wanna see what you can do with them

Gillispie: 34.8 mins, 18.4 ppg
Ament: 29.7 mins, 16.7 ppg
Okpara 26.2 mins, 8 ppg
Boswell: 26 mins, 6.2 ppg
Carey: 18.5 mins, 7.4
Estrella: 18.3 mins, 10 ppg

Incoming guys:
Lundblade: 34.1 mins, 15.6 ppg
Ames: 31.9 mins, 16.9 ppg
Haralson: 26.7 mins, 16.2 ppg
Hill Jr: 25 mins, 15.0 ppg
Rubin 29.7 mins, 11.3 ppg

Lundblade and Ames's mpg and therefore their points per game are sure to come down as they'll be rotating the guard spots.

Again, we're working on this together. Not arguing. Let's just explore a more accurate methodology. I love this ****
I think it probably makes more sense to wait until the roster is filled out for your exercise, but I agree. Once we can take an educated guess as to who plays where and how much, we can take a stab at offensive impact. And I do agree, Ames and Lundblade are likely to canabalize each other's minite and opportunities relative to what they averaged at their previous stops.
 
You clearly don’t understand how bad Lundblade is defensively. You know Boswell is getting paid more than Lundblade next season right?
This isn’t my conversation but don’t underestimate Barnes ability to improve defense. That’s one MAIN reason Lundblade committed to Barnes- defense. Most coaches don’t teach defense as much as Barnes. Most of D is will but there is a skill to it.

This young man will be much better on D than last season. If not, he will ride the pine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeadVol77
Have you watched his highlights. The dude has a nice stroke from 3 and can take a guy off the bounce. For an underclassman with talent around him could have better stats. You could do a lot worse than Braedan. I say if its him bring him on board. The guy is a gamer.
Of the guys noted in the shared list, based on small sample size of videos I prefer Hastings and Lue. We need 2 IMO.
 
gillespie was the best finisher at the rim than any other guard ive seen at tennessee .just saying
He definitely absorbed contact and patiently continued the shot at the rim really well. Oddly enough Chris Lofton was famed for his three point shooting. Bruce Pearl however made him work on his moves to the basket realizing him drawing free throws was a huge asset considering Chris' percentages. By Pearl's 2nd season, Chris Junior year he was very good at the same things you see in Gillespie after going into the trees absorbing contact and still finding a way to make the basket.
 
Really not concerned about scoring or past impact that much out of front court depth. We need size and length out of that spot, someone with the natural tools to defend the basket. Barnes can get them right on defense technically. I’d be sorely disappointed if we bring in an undersized, utility type big man without someone with the potential to be a rim protector.
 
Really not concerned about scoring or past impact that much out of front court depth. We need size and length out of that spot, someone with the natural tools to defend the basket. Barnes can get them right on defense technically. I’d be sorely disappointed if we bring in an undersized, utility type big man without someone with the potential to be a rim protector.
I agree. I actually like Lue (if he’s the guy) visiting today, but still think we need a lengthy true 5 whether it’s to start or come off the bench. Not saying he has to be 7 foot but someone who will challenge shots at the rim like Okpara did so well
 
Man people forget about Jordan Bone. McCrae also great around the rim but as a wing.

I’d add Chandler as well. But he didn’t have to take as many in traffic because he smoked so many guys off the dribble, so he went uncontested a lot. Also had an elite floater.

JG I would say was quite good at taking contested shots at the rim though. He made a LOT of tough shots where he hit the floor after.
 
He definitely absorbed contact and patiently continued the shot at the rim really well. Oddly enough Chris Lofton was famed for his three point shooting. Bruce Pearl however made him work on his moves to the basket realizing him drawing free throws was a huge asset considering Chris' percentages. By Pearl's 2nd season, Chris Junior year he was very good at the same things you see in Gillespie after going into the trees absorbing contact and still finding a way to make the basket.
Lofton was a wizard on the fast break. He would throw high shots off the backboard with a defender all over him and it would go in every time. A lot of people forget that about him.
 
Reminder...I never said it was great I just shared the numbers.

I’m not really interested in debating the definition of “great” either. The numbers are interesting and I think they kinda agree with my impression from watching the games. That little jump hook is reasonably reliable and very valuable when you have 2-3 other guys on the floor who either can’t or won’t score, but it’s not some kind of super power either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoCo_Vol

Advertisement



Back
Top