President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

#49,351
#49,351
BeardedVol said:
He is now, exactly where he said the Republican party shouldn't go back in 2016.

So how is he any different than Vance in that respect?

No need to try to deflect to Biden, this is about Rubio.
Click to expand...
So, if we are not deflecting, then don't defelct to 9 years ago. I was specifically referring to being a fan of Rubio for POTUS now, for the upcoming 2028 cycle.
 
#49,352
#49,352
GVF said:
So, if we are not deflecting, then don't defelct to 9 years ago. I was specifically referring to being a fan of Rubio for POTUS now, for the upcoming 2028 cycle.
Click to expand...
Lol so it's "deflecting" to point out that Rubio was just as anti-Trump as Vance before he capitulated to MAGA, just like Vance?

tenor.gif
 
#49,353
#49,353
BeardedVol said:
Lol so it's "deflecting" to point out that Rubio was just as anti-Trump as Vance before he capitulated to MAGA, just like Vance?

tenor.gif
Click to expand...
IIRC he was anti-Trump in 2016 largely because he was in primaries against Trump and a slew of others. They were supposed to play nice and promote each other for POTUS ??
 
#49,354
#49,354
GVF said:
IIRC he was anti-Trump in 2016 largely because he was in primaries against Trump and a slew of others. They were supposed to play nice and promote each other for POTUS ??
Click to expand...
It has been awhile since his party held a primary. They seem to prefer to appoint/select their candidates and like the use of super delegates to make sure their central command achieves their desires.

1764012445565.png
 
#49,355
#49,355
GVF said:
IIRC he was anti-Trump in 2016 largely because he was in primaries against Trump and a slew of others. They were supposed to play nice and promote each other for POTUS ??
Click to expand...

So he was only faking being against Trump in 2016?

So how exactly does that help your argument that he's somehow better than Vance in his flip-flopping?
 
#49,357
#49,357
BeardedVol said:
So he was only faking being against Trump in 2016?

So how exactly does that help your argument that he's somehow better than Vance in his flip-flopping?
Click to expand...
WGAF what his trump feelings were almost 10 years ago. IDGAS. He's a great candidate for 2028 and i'll vote for him. Matter of fact I'll vote for anyone red in 2028 cause we all know the blue won't have any choices worth wiping one's a**.
 
#49,359
#49,359
GVF said:
WGAF what his trump feelings were almost 10 years ago. IDGAS. He's a great candidate for 2028 and i'll vote for him. Matter of fact I'll vote for anyone red in 2028 cause we all know the blue won't have any choices worth wiping one's a**.
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't you?

He literally warned against the Republican party following a conman and becoming a cult of personality.

Which in the last 10 years, it has, and he has fully embraced it in spite of his own warning not to.

So again, in reference to Vance calling Trump America's Hitler and flip-flopping to join the person he called America'a Hitler, how is Rubio any different in the end?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#49,360
#49,360
BeardedVol said:
Why wouldn't you?

He literally warned against the Republican party following a conman and becoming a cult of personality.

Which in the last 10 years, it has, and he has fully embraced it in spot of his own warning not so.

So again, in reference to Vance calling Trump America's Hitler and flip-flopping to join the person he called America'a Hitler, how is Rubio any different in the end?
Click to expand...
What part of IDGAS what he said in primaries 10 years ago do you not get?
 
#49,361
#49,361
BeardedVol said:
Lol
www.dailymail.co.uk

Judge throws out Comey and James cases, humiliates Trump's prosecutor

President Donald Trump's revenge plot against James Comey might be foiled.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...

HAHHAHAHAHHAHA

SUCK IT DONALD.

Elect a clown, expect a circus.

Judge Cameron Currie accused Trump's hand-picked attorney Lindsey Halligan of 'prosecutorial misconduct' after she secured indictments against the former FBI director Comey and New York Attorney General James.

Halligan is 'a former White House aide with no prior prosecutorial experience' who was never eligible to serve, the judge said.

A 120-day deadline on interim appointments expired during the previous prosecutor's tenure, meaning Pam Bondi did not have the authority to appoint Halligan - this was up to the district's federal judges.

'I conclude that all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan's defective appointment, including securing and signing Mr. Comey's indictment, constitute unlawful exercises of executive power and must be set aside,' wrote Currie, a Bill Clinton-appointed judge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
#49,365
#49,365
#49,366
#49,366
#49,369
#49,369
RockyTop85 said:
Has anybody reported whether different disciplinary procedures apply to “potentially divisive” and “hate?”
Click to expand...
www.newsweek.com

Coast Guard denies easing ban on swastikas, nooses amid policy backlash

Admiral Kevin Lunday told Newsweek that symbols like swastikas and nooses "remain prohibited" by the USCG.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

That language has been removed in the updated guidance, replaced with the term “potentially divisive,” and delegates decision-making to local commanders. However, according to Lunday, this does not mean the symbols are no longer prohibited.

The new policy says commanders are now instructed to consult legal counsel before determining whether a symbol violates policy and “adversely affects” morale, unit cohesion or mission readiness. It also introduces a formal 45-day deadline for reporting such incidents, a change critics say could discourage complaints—particularly for service members deployed at sea for extended periods.

Under the 2023 guidelines, swastikas, nooses, and other imagery co-opted by hate groups were treated as inherently harmful, with little room for interpretation—any display was considered a potential hate incident requiring review.
 
#49,370
#49,370
BeardedVol said:
Lol, does it help your MAGA heart to read it on Fox news instead?

www.foxnews.com

Federal judge dismisses James Comey, Letitia James indictments

Judge Cameron Currie, a Clinton appointee, tossed out Comey's and James' charges, find that they were brought by an invalid U.S. attorney.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...

@W.TN.Orange Blood just mindlessly posts the latest extreme right-wing drivel nonstop. Pretty sure he (it) is a dumb-bot.

New research on Trump voters: They’re not the sharpest tools in the box​

Now there's proof: Trump's voters lack "cognitive sophistication," often believe Bible is literal word of God​

 
#49,371
#49,371
MontyPython said:
@W.TN.Orange Blood just mindlessly posts the latest extreme right-wing drivel nonstop. Pretty sure he (it) is a dumb-bot.

New research on Trump voters: They’re not the sharpest tools in the box​

Now there's proof: Trump's voters lack "cognitive sophistication," often believe Bible is literal word of God​

Click to expand...
Coming from you everyone knows its Fake news. Wasting your time as usual.
You're getting about as bad as Swapyfox boy w/trashy posts. Thanks for playing..
 
#49,374
#49,374
luthervol said:
www.newsweek.com

Coast Guard denies easing ban on swastikas, nooses amid policy backlash

Admiral Kevin Lunday told Newsweek that symbols like swastikas and nooses "remain prohibited" by the USCG.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

That language has been removed in the updated guidance, replaced with the term “potentially divisive,” and delegates decision-making to local commanders. However, according to Lunday, this does not mean the symbols are no longer prohibited.

The new policy says commanders are now instructed to consult legal counsel before determining whether a symbol violates policy and “adversely affects” morale, unit cohesion or mission readiness. It also introduces a formal 45-day deadline for reporting such incidents, a change critics say could discourage complaints—particularly for service members deployed at sea for extended periods.

Under the 2023 guidelines, swastikas, nooses, and other imagery co-opted by hate groups were treated as inherently harmful, with little room for interpretation—any display was considered a potential hate incident requiring review.
Click to expand...
For some reason you once again left off a key paragraph clarifying the commandant’s full statement. Hey at least you’re posting original articles now instead of pulling ZeroHedge type relinks

That language has been removed in the updated guidance, replaced with the term “potentially divisive,” and delegates decision-making to local commanders. However, according to Lunday, this does not mean the symbols are no longer prohibited.

"Symbols such as swastikas, nooses and other extremist or racist imagery violate our core values and are treated with the seriousness they warrant under current policy," Lunday told Newsweek.
 
#49,375
#49,375
RockyTop85 said:
Has anybody reported whether different disciplinary procedures apply to “potentially divisive” and “hate?”
Click to expand...
There is a link somewhere in all this to the new policy. In the first couple of pages the summary states the term “hate symbol” and such are removed. All focus thus far just seems to have been on the terminology change however the commandant has made explicit statements that the same penalties apply.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top