Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

Re-establishing an industrial economy in a nation that is post-industrial and service-based is inefficient. I understand pining for bygone times, but you need to understand that’s not how macroeconomics work.
increasing dependence on bloat attached to services only exasterbates inflation. We see this in the medical field, government and nearly all other facets of our economy. The service based economy isn't enough alone to sustain us with jobs, and the jobs created come at the price of inflation.

Increasingly we have priced the poor, lower middle class and rural workers into impossible situations.

Nobody is pining for an industrial based economy. But we do need a balanced economy. We need more meat and less fat.
 
Last edited:
Why have none of the lefties here spoke out about Epstien and plaskett, or Epstein being invited to a dinner by Obama for Jefferies .. After his conviction... Seriously..
You would do better to not try to spice it up. I agree it's a bad look for Hakeem Jeffries, but Epstein was not invited to that fundraising dinner by Barack Obama.
 
You would do better to not try to spice it up. I agree it's a bad look for Jefferies, but Epstein was not invited to that fundraising dinner by Barack Obama.
It was an Obama's hosted dinner to introduce Jefferies. They even offered a private table and meeting.. No spice needed truth works fine.
 
Epstein's bro says a lot of **** here, but the one that stood out to me is about R's scrubbing R names before release.

As soon as the admin started fighting the release, trust became a problem. I will never know for sure, and will always be suspicious that they spent the last 10 months hiding the truth forever.

Given this, I'm not buying his BS

Epstein refused to discuss the emails at length Monday night.
 
It was an Obama's hosted dinner to introduce Jefferies. They even offered a private table and meeting.. No spice needed truth works fine.
Can you please point out where the link you posted supports the claim you are making.

You simply made a false claim, whether intentionally (lying), or unintentionally (ignorant).
 
Can you please point out where the link you posted supports the claim you are making.

You simply made a false claim, whether intentionally (lying), or unintentionally (ignorant).
Hakeem is committed to electing a Democratic majority in 2014 and is encouraging his friends to participate in the DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with President Obama this coming Monday night,”
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
It was an Obama's hosted dinner to introduce Jefferies. They even offered a private table and meeting.. No spice needed truth works fine.
You claimed that Epstein was invited by Obama, which the article makes clear isn't the truth. The e-mail invite was authored by a political consulting firm named Dynamic SRG, and specifically by Lisa Rossi, a partner at the firm. It reached Epstein by way of a former Epstein executive assistant named Lesley Groff.

It's still a bad look for Jeffries, but to make this about Obama is indeed "spicing it up."
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Epstein's bro says a lot of **** here, but the one that stood out to me is about R's scrubbing R names before release.

As soon as the admin started fighting the release, trust became a problem. I will never know for sure, and will always be suspicious that they spent the last 10 months hiding the truth forever.


What should have stood out if you were sane is the last 20 years.
 
You claimed that Epstein was invited by Obama, which the article makes clear isn't the truth. The e-mail invite was authored by a political consulting firm named Dynamic SRG, and specifically by Lisa Rossi, a partner at the firm. It reached Epstein by way of a former Epstein executive assistant named Lesley Groff.

It's still a bad look for Jeffries, but to make this about Obama is indeed "spicing it up."
I said it was an Obama's hosted party which is was.... Not that he personally invited him.. But being the biggest Dem listed, if his staff who her a guest list to prevent conflict didn't see the invitation as an issue then we can conclude that the staff acting on behalf of Obama were fine with the Epstien invite. No spice it's logic
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Hakeem is committed to electing a Democratic majority in 2014 and is encouraging his friends to participate in the DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with President Obama this coming Monday night,”
you said this...
or Epstein being invited to a dinner by Obama

so you weren't meaning that Obama invited Epstein to a dinner???? because your wording makes it seem that way.

Jefferies didn't even invite him to the dinner.

Why don't you take a few minutes and go back and reword your accusations.
 
What should have stood out if you were sane is the last 20 years.
What should have stood out to you, is that Donald Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files in 2024 because that was what his MAGA base overwhelmingly supported. Trump's Attorney General, Pam Bondi, even described releasing the Epstein files as a top priority of hers, after her confirmation.

But now ..... we are supposed to think of the release of the Epstein files as a "Democrat hoax." Only in Trump's orbit, is such thinking even rational.
 
you said this...
or Epstein being invited to a dinner by Obama

so you weren't meaning that Obama invited Epstein to a dinner???? because your wording makes it seem that way.

Jefferies didn't even invite him to the dinner.

Why don't you take a few minutes and go back and reword your accusations.
Changed to with, since that is important.. Not that the Dems were inviting a convinced pedophile to dinner with the most popular Dem... And it was acceptable by that Dems staff who didn't seem to think it was an issue that a convicted pedophile was gonna have dinner at the same fundraiser...
 
What should have stood out to you, is that Donald Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files in 2024 because that was what his MAGA base overwhelmingly supported. Trump's Attorney General, Pam Bondi, even described releasing the Epstein files as a top priority of hers, after her confirmation.

But now ..... we are supposed to think of the release of the Epstein files as a "Democrat hoax." Only in Trump's orbit, is such thinking even rational.
Yeah, a big problem for me is how much he doubled back with the Epstein stuff. Israel told him to wait until the time's right 😂
 
I said it was an Obama's hosted party which is was.... Not that he personally invited him.. But being the biggest Dem listed, if his staff who her a guest list to prevent conflict didn't see the invitation as an issue then we can conclude that the staff acting on behalf of Obama were fine with the Epstien invite. No spice it's logic
lol..........
That's some fancy backpedaling.......and you're still way off track.

Go ahead and finish the story.....did Epstein go to the dinner? Why or why not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Changed to with, since that is important.. Not that the Dems were inviting a convinced pedophile to dinner with the most popular Dem... And it was acceptable by that Dems staff who didn't seem to think it was an issue that a convicted pedophile was gonna have dinner at the same fundraiser...
Did he go? Why or why not?

I think the answer to that may give us some clarity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
I said it was an Obama's hosted party which is was.... Not that he personally invited him.. But being the biggest Dem listed, if his staff who her a guest list to prevent conflict didn't see the invitation as an issue then we can conclude that the staff acting on behalf of Obama were fine with the Epstien invite. No spice it's logic
There is a fatal flaw in your "conclusion."

Jeffrey Epstein did not actually attend that fundraising dinner.

So, you do not know whether or not "the staff acting on behalf of Obama were fine with the Epstein invite."
 
What should have stood out to you, is that Donald Trump campaigned on releasing the Epstein files in 2024 because that was what his MAGA base overwhelmingly supported. Trump's Attorney General, Pam Bondi, even described releasing the Epstein files as a top priority of hers, after her confirmation.

But now ..... we are supposed to think of the release of the Epstein files as a "Democrat hoax." Only in Trump's orbit, is such thinking even rational.

Why should that stand out to me? I think it was a government operation and don't vote.

But now ..... we are supposed to think of the release of the Epstein files as a "Democrat hoax."

Insane or TDS I would say. With that said, I would like it all to come to light but with that might come many assassinations. You can think whatever you want, not much I can do about that.
 
Why should that stand out to me? I think it was a government operation and don't vote.



Insane or TDS I would say. With that said, I would like it all to come to light but with that might come many assassinations. You can think whatever you want, not much I can do about that.
Did Pam Bondi have TDS when she described releasing the Epstein files a top priority of hers?
 
Advertisement





Back
Top