BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 46,942
- Likes
- 41,620
Going ahead and laying the groundwork.
Professional criticism.That's not true at all.
Donald Trump frequently responds to professional criticism with personal attacks.
Again, you sound disappointed Trump is releasing it.Yeah, I'm on an island being suspicious of this new qualifier.
A week ago it was that everything was going to be released.
Now its suddenly described as "all unclassified material." And suddenly Trump is on board.
You'd have to be a moron or incredibly naive not to question this turn of events.
Actually, it doesn't even have to be criticism at all, to prompt a personal insult from Trump. It's baffling what some of you will defend him for.Professional criticism.
You and your media have been framing him, lawfaring him, impeaching him, lying about him, trying to destroy him since 2015. Forgive me if I call bull **** on professional criticism. Most people would be in jail for what your people have pulled. At least your media propaganda machine has had to pay for their lying.
Weren’t you calling for impeachment or criminal charges for Trump allegedly holding classified material at Mar-a-Lago?Yeah, I'm on an island being suspicious of this new qualifier.
A week ago it was that everything was going to be released.
Now its suddenly described as "all unclassified material." And suddenly Trump is on board.
You'd have to be a moron or incredibly naive not to question this turn of events.
Rep. Thomas Massie has expressed the same concern. Massie is really causing problems for the "Democrat hoax" narrative.Yeah, I'm on an island being suspicious of this new qualifier.
A week ago it was that everything was going to be released.
Now its suddenly described as "all unclassified material." And suddenly Trump is on board.
You'd have to be a moron or incredibly naive not to question this turn of events.
It WAS a vote against trump.You voted for a guy in a basement, don’t mention spineless. You voted for Hillary…you used to say it was to vote against Trump as your spin. 10 years later he’s controlling your emotions and breaking you daily.
What do you think is a worse slur, a nazi or a slob?Actually, it doesn't even have to be criticism at all, to prompt a personal insult from Trump. It's baffling what some of you will defend him for.
In October of 2020, Trump called pollster Frank Luntz, of Fox News, a "slob" just because Luntz had the nerve to predict that Biden would win Arizona.
.... which he did.
My favorite Trump moment from this saga is this quote "I have asked for House Republicans to vote to release the Epstein files because we have nothing to hide."Ha ha, he previously tried the "grand jury" files which anyone with a room temperature IQ knew of a miniscule fraction of total file...
Not sure what that has to do with my post."Quiet piggy!!"
trump to a reporter ........it's hard not to admire such a leader.
Weren’t you calling for impeachment or criminal charges for Trump allegedly holding classified material at Mar-a-Lago?
Now you think he should release it to the public?
What if he does, are you going to call for his arrest again for leaking classified info?
Because we are a decade in of him dominating your daily living. It’s comical at this point how he’s beat you down.It WAS a vote against trump.
The fact that I said at least 100 times that I would vote for a rock over trump should have been a clue!
He does not now nor ever did control my emotions, but he is still a horrendously despicable human.
Great post .... until the last sentence, which ignores a key component.I personally have no clue what is in the files but what I do know is that - guilt by association does not prove guilt.
That is like saying I should be charged with something because someone I may have talked to or am a friend with was charged for something. That is not how it works.
There is the potential for a lot of surprises with politicians and famous people on all sides of the aisle with this and there is the potential of it being a bunch of nothing.
Like I said before, there are bigger issues for our congress folks and senators to be concerned with right now.
This is all a diversion by one party that does not want to get down to business.
Your earliet question is, what could be classified in this ? My natural subsidiary questions are whether what we all would understand to be classified matches what the administration will deem qualified, and who is calling that shot.
Given the intense efforts to block it, and the turnaround as this classified thing emerged, these are reasonable questions.
And the "legally entitled to" comes from Trumps posting on this in the last few days. Its a new qualifier he has added in. Which further marries to someone taking stuff out and we dont know who and we don't know why.
Yeah, I'm on an island being suspicious of this new qualifier.
A week ago it was that everything was going to be released.
Now its suddenly described as "all unclassified material." And suddenly Trump is on board.
You'd have to be a moron or incredibly naive not to question this turn of events.
