Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

[SquirrelOrange3]

 

[CobbVol]

Once again with the radical dem party, the ends justify the means, even the Constitution when going after Trump ...

From the article:

Workers at the Texas federal prison camp housing Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell have been fired for leaking emails in which she described the cushy conditions — and the Democratic lawmaker who purportedly made them public should be punished too, her attorney said in a fiery statement Friday.

“The provision of those emails to a federal official who then caused them to be shared with the media is a breach of constitutional protections including the First, Sixth and Fourteenth amendments afforded to all prisoners.”

In Friday’s statement, Saffian claimed that Maxwell, serving a 20-year sentence after her December 2021 conviction for federal charges of grooming and sexually abusing young women, “has not requested a commutation — or a made a pardon — application to the second Trump administration.”

Prison fires staff who leaked Ghislaine Maxwell emails — and lawyer wants punishment for Jamie Raskin

An attorney for Maxwell rebuked Rep. Jamie Raskin for allegedly leaking the emails to media — calling it a “denial of justice” that “undermines the whole legal process.”

nypost.com

 

[BeardedVol]

Once again with the radical dem party, the ends justify the means, even the Constitution when going after Trump ...

From the article:

Workers at the Texas federal prison camp housing Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell have been fired for leaking emails in which she described the cushy conditions — and the Democratic lawmaker who purportedly made them public should be punished too, her attorney said in a fiery statement Friday.

“The provision of those emails to a federal official who then caused them to be shared with the media is a breach of constitutional protections including the First, Sixth and Fourteenth amendments afforded to all prisoners.”

In Friday’s statement, Saffian claimed that Maxwell, serving a 20-year sentence after her December 2021 conviction for federal charges of grooming and sexually abusing young women, “has not requested a commutation — or a made a pardon — application to the second Trump administration.”

Prison fires staff who leaked Ghislaine Maxwell emails — and lawyer wants punishment for Jamie Raskin

An attorney for Maxwell rebuked Rep. Jamie Raskin for allegedly leaking the emails to media — calling it a “denial of justice” that “undermines the whole legal process.”

nypost.com

MAGA to English translation: " a whistleblower blew the lid on BOP officials being forced to cater to the whims of a convicted sex trafficker, and we're mad about it".

Whistleblower Shares Evidence That Federal Prison Camp Warden is Pampering Ghislaine Maxwell, Maxwell Also Filing a “Commutation Application” With Trump Administration

Washington, D.C. (November 10, 2025)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to President Donald Trump demanding that he answer inquiries from the Committee and make Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche available for a public hearing in light of...

democrats-judiciary.house.gov

 

[BeardedVol]

Is this when MAGA tries to posthumously retcon Epstein, to try and mitigate Trump's involvement with him?

Megyn Kelly Questions Whether Child Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Counts as a Pedophile: 'He Liked the Very Young Teen Type'

Megyn Kelly used a recent episode of her radio show to question whether convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could be considered a pedophile, saying, 'There's a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?'

people.com

Will this be the standard MAGA defense of Trump's inevitable pardon pf Ghislain Maxwell?

 

[JMSqb11]

The problem with the release by the Oversight dems redacting the name of the victim is that the unredacted email shows that the victim was/is Virginia Giuffre who had gone on record multiple times not invoking or accusing Trump from her time being trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell.

My core belief is that obviously everyone of all swaths and political parties and businesses were involved in the Epstein ring. But I do not trust Dems or Republicans when it comes to email releases with redactions.

Release them all unredacted so the public can see it crystal clear. There is a reason the Oversight Dems redacted her name.

 

[Majors]

Is this when MAGA tries to posthumously retcon Epstein, to try and mitigate Trump's involvement with him?

Megyn Kelly Questions Whether Child Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein Counts as a Pedophile: 'He Liked the Very Young Teen Type'

Megyn Kelly used a recent episode of her radio show to question whether convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could be considered a pedophile, saying, 'There's a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?'

people.com

Will this be the standard MAGA defense of Trump's inevitable pardon pf Ghislain Maxwell?

No, it’s just a reminder of your fake rage of a topic that you were told to care about once Trumps name became involved. For you it’s not about the girls, which is sad.

 

[CobbVol]

MAGA to English translation: " a whistleblower blew the lid on BOP officials being forced to cater to the whims of a convicted sex trafficker, and we're mad about it".

Whistleblower Shares Evidence That Federal Prison Camp Warden is Pampering Ghislaine Maxwell, Maxwell Also Filing a “Commutation Application” With Trump Administration

Washington, D.C. (November 10, 2025)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to President Donald Trump demanding that he answer inquiries from the Committee and make Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche available for a public hearing in light of...

democrats-judiciary.house.gov

Radical dem showing he does not fully understand attorney-client privilege as he wipes his arse with the Constitution.

 

[BeardedVol]

Radical dem showing he does not fully understand attorney-client privilege as he wipes his arse with the Constitution.

None of the correspondence handed to the Senate judiciary committee violate attorney client privilege.


Keep shilling for a convicted sex trafficker though in an attempt to "own the libs", it's a good look for you.

 

[CobbVol]

None of the correspondence handed to the Senate judiciary committee violate attorney client privilege.
View attachment 789889

Keep shilling for a convicted sex trafficker though in an attempt to "own the libs", it's a good look for you.

So sad how the Constitution goes out the window when it goes to getting Trump for this radical dem party ...

She added that Raskin, who is both an attorney and a former law professor, “must be aware that his conduct undermines the whole legal process,” calling it a matter that “should be” referred for professional discipline.

She argued that providing those emails to Raskin, and his decision to make them public, breached Maxwell’s First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

“Dressing the improper action up as ‘Whistleblower Information’ does not mitigate the fact that the emails were both illegally obtained and put to an unconstitutional purpose,” she wrote.

https://dailyvoice.com/new-york/bronxville/ghislaine-maxwell-lawyer-slams-maryland-rep-raskin-for-shocking-release-of-privileged-emails/

 

[luthervol]

No, it’s just a reminder of your fake rage of a topic that you were told to care about once Trumps name became involved. For you it’s not about the girls, which is sad.

I always wanted all information released.

trump being terrified of a total release raises all types of red flags.

 

[Majors]

I always wanted all information released.

trump being terrified of a total release raises all types of red flags.

Your posting history and how long this has been out there has determined that’s a lie.

Many conservatives here said release it and burn it down long before the recent liberal fake rage.

 

[luthervol]

Your posting history and how long this has been out there has determined that’s a lie.

Many conservatives here said release it and burn it down long before the recent liberal fake rage.

Nope.
I've always wanted a complete release.

You claiming otherwise just proves bias and partisanship are actually your driving forces, not mine.

 

[Majors]

Nope.
I've always wanted a complete release.

You claiming otherwise just proves bias and partisanship are actually your driving forces, not mine.

Actually it’s not, all your post from 2019 are about Trump. Not the girls or the release. You even questioned Virginia for saying Trump never engaged in sex with girls. Tell me more about the proven bias and talk of driving force. Regale us all on the timeline of when you shifted to the release and not about Trump.

I wonder why she would change her story. It's not like Trump has a proven history of paying people hundreds of thousands of dollars to lie for him.


The story quotes Giuffre as saying: "Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey's. He didn't partake in sex with any of us but he flirted with me. He'd laugh and tell Jeffrey, 'You've got the life.'"
In the deposition, Giuffre says "it's true that he didn't partake in any sex with us, (but) it's not true that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me." She also says her only basis for stating that Trump was a "good friend" was Epstein's own description of his relationship with Trump.
Asked whether she ever saw the two men together, Giuffre replies, "No, not that I can actually remember." She also says she can't recall ever having seen Trump at Epstein's homes in the US Virgin Islands, New Mexico or New York.

 

[Rickyvol77]

I always wanted all information released.

trump being terrified of a total release raises all types of red flags.

Was it the same type of red flags when Biden refused to release it?

 

[n_huffhines]

I don't think it's fun to accuse people of being a pedo without actual proof. I find it gross. Don't care who you vote for or hate. It's disgusting character assasination. I've never called Biden a Pedo and won't unless there is more proof.

Proof? More proof? What does proof mean? If you have proof why do you need more of it? Have I even called Trump a pedo? Pretty sure I've just been saying he at least knew something, which he did, and didn't inform or do anything.

And I don't trust Mark but he wrote the email soooooo

What does this mean? You don't find him credible except this clarification because he wrote the email?

And I don't trust what Epstein says in his bc well he's a pedo

Where's your proof? As far as we know, he just trafficked underage girls, right? Be very careful with that pedo label when you're talking about awful people.

The majority of the underage stuff I have concerns with Trump have zero to do with Epstein

I don't understand what this means.

Also, If Trump blew some guy named Bubba then who cares? And why does it have anything to do with him potentially assaulting minors? Oh nothing. And you would think if the brother knew he was blowing dudes would also know what he was doing with minors.

OMG, dude. Have some fun. It doesn't have anything to do with him potentially assaulting minors. But it's some hilarious **** in the Epstein files and you are in the Epstein files thread.

 

[mr.checkerboards]

 

[JMSqb11]

This guy is hardly an objective account. He is about as unbiased as the House Oversight Dems are.

 

[n_huffhines]

This guy is hardly an objective account. He is about as unbiased as the House Oversight Dems are.

So in 2019, when the walls are closing in on Epstein, he decides to write an email to himself to specifically exonerate Trump. Trump was powerful enough to have him killed or set him free. Why did he do that? Give me a reason?

Also, the letter says that Trump knew of it and came over to Epstein's house "many times." So, once again, he knew about this **** and didn't disassociate or inform. He's not worthy of working for Penn St, let alone of holding the highest office in the country.

 

[luthervol]

Was it the same type of red flags when Biden refused to release it?

Of course not. Biden was never associated with Epstein. Hell, it was widely known trump and Epstein were BFFs.

But it would have been similar if Clinton were to refuse.....and I know exactly how the right would have interpreted that refusal......and you do also if you are being honest with yourself.

 

[JMSqb11]

So in 2019, when the walls are closing in on Epstein, he decides to write an email to himself to specifically exonerate Trump. Trump was powerful enough to have him killed or set him free. Why did he do that? Give me a reason?

Also, the letter says that Trump knew of it and came over to Epstein's house "many times." So, once again, he knew about this **** and didn't disassociate or inform. He's not worthy of working for Penn St, let alone of holding the highest office in the country.

Nothing new that wasn’t already known regarding Trump came out in these emails last week. Shocker that Epstein did not like Trump…

Especially the “redacted” ones the Oversight Dems released saying Virginia Giuffre spent hours with Trump when she in record multiple times she never encountered or witness Trump doing anything.

Once again, all of these releases that are snippets or redactions are hardly objective pieces of evidence.

Release them all unredacted and let the public be the judge.

 

[luthervol]

Actually it’s not, all your post from 2019 are about Trump. Not the girls or the release. You even questioned Virginia for saying Trump never engaged in sex with girls. Tell me more about the proven bias and talk of driving force. Regale us all on the timeline of when you shifted to the release and not about Trump.

lol.....massive fail................That discussion was specifically about her testimony as it related to trump.

And it's interesting that the recently released e-mails prove that she was lying.

 

[JMSqb11]

Of course not. Biden was never associated with Epstein. Hell, it was widely known trump and Epstein were BFFs.

But it would have been similar if Clinton were to refuse.....and I know exactly how the right would have interpreted that refusal......and you do also if you are being honest with yourself.

If there was evidence incriminating Trump directly with a minor, Biden and Garland would have released it leading up to the election. What I truly believe is there are more than enough career federal officials from all walks of the political spectrum in them. Biden could have literally dumped it all out and burned down everyone including part of his side. I bet he wishes he did now considering how they coup’d him.

 

[JMSqb11]

lol.....massive fail................That discussion was specifically about her testimony as it related to trump.

And it's interesting that the recently released e-mails prove that she was lying.

So the victim who did not hesitate to name virtually tons of prominent people was lying about Trump or Jeff Epstein was a standup honest pedophile? Both can’t be true.

Apparently people are now of the position that Epstein was a pedophile but an honest one.

 

[Orange_Crush]

...

And it's interesting that the recently released e-mails prove that she was lying.

How so?

 

[luthervol]

If there was evidence incriminating Trump directly with a minor, Biden and Garland would have released it leading up to the election. What I truly believe is there are more than enough career federal officials from all walks of the political spectrum in them. Biden could have literally dumped it all out and burned down everyone including part of his side. I bet he wishes he did now considering how they coup’d him.

great way to drain the swamp........but maybe DC isn't actually the swampiest.