Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#6,226
#6,226
luthervol said:
great way to drain the swamp........but maybe DC isn't actually the swampiest.
Click to expand...

I mean the texts coming out with him directing Plaskett with questioning of Cohen in real time is pretty damning. And she refused to return his donations.

I’d say it’s safe that she wasn’t only member of Congress on either side with that level of access with Epstein.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#6,229
#6,229
n_huffhines said:
So in 2019, when the walls are closing in on Epstein, he decides to write an email to himself to specifically exonerate Trump. Trump was powerful enough to have him killed or set him free. Why did he do that? Give me a reason?

Also, the letter says that Trump knew of it and came over to Epstein's house "many times." So, once again, he knew about this **** and didn't disassociate or inform. He's not worthy of working for Penn St, let alone of holding the highest office in the country.
Click to expand...
Dont cast stones from glass houses. I would gander a guess that most politicians have skeletons in their closet.
 
#6,230
#6,230
luthervol said:
That she didn't recall having seen trump in Epstein's (NY) home.
Click to expand...

So the predator’s email accusation is bigger piece and more credible than the person he said Trump was with who has testified and sworn she never once encounter Trump or witnessed him doing anything? All while the same victim has failed to stop short of naming tons of prominent people involved?

Apparently, people are of the position that Epstein was a very honest individual
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#6,232
#6,232
The left: "I hate Donald Trump enough to hold a pedophile predator up as the standard by which we will attack his victim."

Luther: #MeToo

Harvey WhineStein: "WTH?!"
 
#6,234
#6,234
CobbVol said:
So sad how the Constitution goes out the window when it goes to getting Trump for this radical dem party ...

She added that Raskin, who is both an attorney and a former law professor, “must be aware that his conduct undermines the whole legal process,” calling it a matter that “should be” referred for professional discipline.

She argued that providing those emails to Raskin, and his decision to make them public, breached Maxwell’s First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

“Dressing the improper action up as ‘Whistleblower Information’ does not mitigate the fact that the emails were both illegally obtained and put to an unconstitutional purpose,” she wrote.

Click to expand...
What part of this is hard for you to understand?
1763312738251.png
 
#6,238
#6,238
BeardedVol said:
Go back and read the thread before you jump into the discussion; you've already embarrassed yourself a couple of times recently not doing so.
Click to expand...

I did read it, and no I didn't embarrass myself. Big tough guy that won't sign up for the Ukrainian army.

Obviously, leaking information from those sources are problematic. You actually have a former DOJ employee who was leaking information, and than lied about it under criminal indictment.

Update: Looks like one prison staffer has been fired for giving information away already.

My random and wild guess is Maxwell gets pardoned, or conviction possibly thrown out at some future date. (we'll see how it works out)

There is a reason why Raskin needed a pardon, the President had reason to believe he committed a crime(s).
 
Last edited:
#6,239
#6,239
luthervol said:
Of course not. Biden was never associated with Epstein. Hell, it was widely known trump and Epstein were BFFs.

But it would have been similar if Clinton were to refuse.....and I know exactly how the right would have interpreted that refusal......and you do also if you are being honest with yourself.
Click to expand...
Well my issue isn't that as much as using "logic" to believe that there is some kind of actual damning evidence of Trump and that Biden and Dems suppressed it for four years instead of leaking it or using it against him...
leads me to believe it's really not much of anything except embarrassing a little at most, but actual evidence needs to be seen
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#6,240
#6,240
BeardedVol said:
What part of this is hard for you to understand?
View attachment 789908
Click to expand...
Monitor is one thing, sending out to the free world is another. Good to know with you the Constitution does not apply to people in prison and the Congressman is right in infringing on her Constitutional rights for his purpose. Nice to see your view of the world and your comrades will surely be proud of you.
 
#6,241
#6,241
Rickyvol77 said:
Well my issue isn't that as much as using "logic" to believe that there is some kind of actual damning evidence of Trump and that Biden and Dems suppressed it for four years instead of leaking it or using it against him...
leads me to believe it's really not much of anything except embarrassing a little at most, but actual evidence needs to be seen
Click to expand...

I have no idea if Trump was involved or not, I suspect not based on what we know... but the truth is... we don't know. With that said, there are reasons to keep it quiet obviously since everyone has been putting this one under the rug for 2+ decades, if not significantly longer than that.

I do think it should be all release but I know that probably comes with lots of pain, and probably executions of agents globally.

The issue now is Maxwell probably isn't being given Brady material, so even though she was involved in horror crimes it becomes a very strange situation.

I have no idea what the loonies are trying to accomplish here though, if they wanted everything released... it seems like it could have been done.

Epstein Backfire Intensifies: He Was Live-Texting With House Democrat During 2019 'Get Trump' Hearing | ZeroHedge

 
#6,242
#6,242
JMSqb11 said:
So the predator’s email accusation is bigger piece and more credible than the person he said Trump was with who has testified and sworn she never once encounter Trump or witnessed him doing anything? All while the same victim has failed to stop short of naming tons of prominent people involved?

Apparently, people are of the position that Epstein was a very honest individual
Click to expand...
You may not know this but my position is and always has been........
Everybody lies
Some more than others
and for different reasons at different times.

And conversely, everybody tells the truth.

Continuum
 
#6,244
#6,244
luthervol said:
You may not know this but my position is and always has been........
Everybody lies
Some more than others
and for different reasons at different times.

And conversely, everybody tells the truth.

Continuum
Click to expand...
Sure. It's just when trying to ascertain who is more credible most people don't choose the pedophile over the victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, Rickyvol77, LSU-SIU and 1 other person
#6,245
#6,245
Rickyvol77 said:
What do you lie about
Click to expand...

I suspect he did in the last page. (that's assuming an insane person can be held to a standard of lying - most of the time you just disregard them)

Mr. Chicken believes that the end justifies the means. He has no problem voting for murderers, treasonous people, admitted criminals, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#6,246
#6,246
luthervol said:
You may not know this but my position is and always has been........
Everybody lies
Some more than others
and for different reasons at different times.

And conversely, everybody tells the truth.

Continuum
Click to expand...

Virginia G literally named everyone of prominence but somehow took Trump’s secret to the grave. lol. Wild take but it’s a take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, StarRaider and Orangeburst
#6,247
#6,247
JMSqb11 said:
Virginia G literally named everyone of prominence but somehow took Trump’s secret to the grave. lol. Wild take but it’s a take.
Click to expand...
Agreed. We have two disgusting trails in this thread, all justified in their mind by lunatics to just get Trump.
 
#6,248
#6,248
CobbVol said:
Agreed. We have two disgusting trails in this thread, all justified in their mind by lunatics to just get Trump.
Click to expand...

Trump is not innocent from this either. I think you all are morons for trying the "well my side is less involved"......

Trump championed releasing everything during the campaign and now its a battle to follow thru and even going so far to make accommodations for Maxwell.

Just release it all and let it fall where it falls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#6,249
#6,249
I think it'll all get released right before election campaigning kicks off .and we will find a lot of those running will have to drop out or explain their involvement...
 
#6,250
#6,250
CobbVol said:
Monitor is one thing, sending out to the free world is another. Good to know with you the Constitution does not apply to people in prison and the Congressman is right in infringing on her Constitutional rights for his purpose. Nice to see your view of the world and your comrades will surely be proud of you.
Click to expand...

It was sent to a member of the Senate Judiciary committee. How is that sending it to the "free world"?

Which by the way, even if it was, still wouldn't make it a violation of attorney client privilege as you previously stated.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top