berryvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 7,525
- Likes
- 19,552
Both guys have 41 points through 2 games, Ament has done it in 10 less minutes and on a better shooting percentage…we gonna do this all year where folks downplay how good he is?
Boswell hitting 1-2 three pointers a game would be so massive.
I'm also officially worried Abram got the "transfer who could shoot the lights out at previous stop but can't here" disease that infects one Tennessee player every year has happened.
Someone else on the roster will snatch his minutes up if he doesn't make the most of his opportunities.Boswell hitting 1-2 three pointers a game would be so massive.
I'm also officially worried Abram got the "transfer who could shoot the lights out at previous stop but can't here" disease that infects one Tennessee player every year has happened.
Guys like Aj, koa peat, Petersen, boozer etc are jumping off the screen as potential future AS NBA players.Come on, your post sure seemed to imply disappointment of some kind. He can only play the teams in front of him.
I understood it to be Top 3-5 coming in depending on how he develops, but that’s splitting hairs honestly. He’d have to light the game on fire to be #1. However, literally every projection I’ve seen him listed on draft boards have stated how obviously a late bloomer he is and how he has the highest ceiling of most all projected top picks. Hopefully we see some of that here at UT. It would make for a fun season.To be a top 3 projected pick which he was made to be?
Ament is averaging more ppg in 3 fewer minutes, and shooting more than 10% better from the field than Boozer.Guys like Aj, koa peat, Petersen, boozer etc are jumping off the screen as potential future AS NBA players.
I haven’t really seen that from Ament. I still think he’s going to contribute a lot.
Guys like Aj, koa peat, Petersen, boozer etc are jumping off the screen as potential future AS NBA players.
I haven’t really seen that from Ament. I still think he’s going to contribute a lot.
Ament is averaging more ppg in 3 fewer minutes, and shooting more than 10% better from the field than Boozer.
Ament is averaging more ppg and rpg in slightly fewer minutes than Dybantsa.
Peat averages several more points and a higher FG%, but averages 6 more minutes a game and is pretty exclusively an interior presence.
It just seems as though your implicit bias is programmed to judge Ament more harshly than those other players because subconsciously you don't expect Tennessee to have success with these kinds of players. If Ament played for Duke with his current numbers, and Dybantsa was averaging 19 and 7 for Tennessee, or if Boozer was shooting 40% from the field for Tennessee, I'd venture to guess you'd be asking why they aren't producing or jumping off the screen like Ament.
And frankly, you're making these kinds of judgements based on two games for all these kids which isn't fair to anyone, nor is it really logical to be drawing any conclusions from it.
I’m judging strictly off eye test, you’re using #’s off 2 games.
I’ve watched a lot of Tennessee basketball in my life, and if we’re going off both eye test and numbers I can’t think of any freshman in my lifetime that has popped in two games like Ament. He already looks like he’ll be the best true freshman in Tennessee basketball history (except maybe Bernard King, which I wasn’t alive for so can’t draw an opinion), so I’m not sure what realistically we’re looking for from a guy who’s averaging 20 PPG in just 25ish minutes a game.
Smith scored 31 points in his first 2 college games, Ingram scored 36, Ament is at 41 in his first 2 games.The bar for being the best modern freshmen in UTBB history isn’t very high. I was expecting a Jabari smith/ Brandon Ingram level player. I haven’t seen it yet, though it’s early.
Physically I see a taller zaccharie risacher, who isn’t really impressive to me. I would argue ament is already a better prospect.
