Don’t know who they’ll be but I’d expect some guys to leave we aren’t thinking about leaving. Happens to every team.
Guys will ask for raises and they’ll be some that the staff doesn’t feel they want to pay that amount. Especially if Vols go a little more aggressive in portal. Tough to pay a guy from the portal more than what you’re paying guys in the room already. So if you do that then you likely need to give everyone else in the room a raise as well.
Warning: long.
Agree with most the post.
In ref to bolded:
Totally get the concept, but never liked it, especially as a blanket statement. And don’t think it’s 100% true. Specifically, I disagree most with using the term “everyone” in that statement.
This is a business. Your eval is your eval. There is a reasonable range, driven by precedence (current pay), past performance, individual potential, team/position budget, and market prices. This is how I would look at hiring/retaining/promoting anyone. And most have a ceiling too.
Do you get more for having experience and understanding of the current culture and system? Maybe, but not yes. That theoretically “should” be valuable. More appropriately: do I think that experience makes you a better player and that understanding of our culture a better teammate, creating benefit to the team and its potential BOTH on the field and in the locker room? If so, then yes, and to a degree. Will brooks is the perfect example of someone who because of experience and cultural mindset was able to be more valuable than their physical attributes would have suggested alone. Most are not Will Brooks.
I do like to reward loyalty if possible (obviously Heupel does), but tenure alone only goes so far, and to become elite you have to be willing to break through ceilings. Otherwise that’s how less than qualified people reach positions they shouldn’t and businesses hit THEIR ceilings. And here’s the biggest reason I’m not doing that if I’m Heup - giving everyone a raise due to tenure: this isn’t a super small business where the competition is at an advantage, and retention of “anyone” is crucial to the business. We are near the top in everything that helps the player non-monetarily and monetarily. And we “should” have the depth to not have to bend to such demands if our beaks are sound.
So, guy wants more than your eval says? Are you desperate and thus choosing to hold onto that guy? If so, you may end up paying him more than you want to, more than your eval says. And that hurts the overall team. I’d be hard pressed to do that as a Top 10-15 team with top 5 resources. See Nico, the biggest example. I say let him walk.
And heres another extreme and practical example to illustrate the point:
I pull an all American safety from the portal. Is will wright getting a raise? No. The two are not close enough in assessed value to warrant such a comparison of compensation. And Will isn’t denting the two deep. If he’s unhappy with no raise when you’re bringing someone else in, he can walk. Shoot, if he thinks he can make more elsewhere, and it’s only about the money, then he should walk.
So no, everyone ain’t getting raises just because I (Heupel) bring someone else in. And Id go as far as saying if you aren’t a starter, you don’t get to compare yourself to the guy next to you that I’ve brought in to fight for the starting spot. Win the starting spot, then we can talk about comparing yourself to that guy and getting yourself a raise. Want the raise without earning it, there’s the door and you can list me as a reference if you think it will help wherever you’re headed.
You can treat people like family and also be a man of business. Give respect where earned, be honest, be kind when needed and hard when needed, surround them with resources, etc etc. End of the day there’s a balance to be struck with talent and depth, and resources are not unlimited. So yeah jut like you can’t back up the brink truck, you can’t give everyone free money. Once you build the depth and the culture, which we have, then you cut the bottom - and sometimes in the middle - that are no longer (between talent and character combined) a loss we can’t afford, and increase the top talent to the degree you can. With our resources, Wash, rinse, repeat there and you get a program that eventually can win a championship. Even if you lose the occasional squirrel white, Elijah herring, jakobe thomas, Nico, etc
And if that fails, you can always fahr someone.
Also, why are you still reading this? Even I don’t want to listen to me rant any longer.