Open enrollment increases for 2026

This says the continuing the subsidies alone (not UHC) would cost $30B/yr for 24 million....

According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan think tank that focuses on fiscal policy, continuing the expanded credits could cost upwards of $30 billion annually. Findings by KFF, a healthcare policy group, say that over 90% of the 24 million Obamacare enrollees make use of the enhanced credits.


Everybody's got a price....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
Yes!! Yes!! Yes !!
And I’m pretty sure that after 65, @McDad can use his HSA funds on anything he desires - from liposuction, to pedicures, to blow-up sheep.

He would simply owe tax on any non-medical withdrawals. Which would essentially function to convert his HSA funds into the equivalent of Traditional IRA funds.
 
And I’m pretty sure that after 65, @McDad can use his HSA funds on anything he desires - from liposuction, to pedicures, to blow-up sheep.

He would simply owe tax on any non-medical withdrawals. Which would essentially function to convert his HSA funds into the equivalent of Traditional IRA funds.
this_is_some_boo_sheet_thumbnail.png
 
Mo' math from this example that renowned socialist Eats with A Comb Kobachar loves


Without subsidies $1700/mo
With subsidies $442/mo
Difference $1258/mo x 12 = $15,096/yr

The Galls are among roughly 22 million ACA marketplace enrollees — about 92% of all enrollees — who face the prospect of higher premiums in 2026,

$15k x 22 mil = $332 Billion
 
And I’m pretty sure that after 65, @McDad can use his HSA funds on anything he desires - from liposuction, to pedicures, to blow-up sheep.

He would simply owe tax on any non-medical withdrawals. Which would essentially function to convert his HSA funds into the equivalent of Traditional IRA funds.
I've already been using my HSA on hookers and cocaine.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top