No Kings

#576
#576
LSU-SIU said:
You are not providing any information. I checked. I independently went through the names and went on the Secretary of States website and verified. I have no real input as to the other states but there is plenty of litigation on those states as well.

Regardless, how is this loony strategy working out?
Click to expand...
You are the one making the allegation, and have not proved a damn thing. I'm telling you the Michigan theory was blown to hell. I've covered that on here so many times now ... I just don't feel like doing it anymore. This is pathetic of you.
 
#578
#578
BowlBrother85 said:
You are the one making the allegation, and have not proved a damn thing. I'm telling you the Michigan theory was blown to hell. I've covered that on here so many times now ... I just don't feel like doing it anymore. This is pathetic of you.
Click to expand...

Proving and evidence are two different things. You said there was no evidence, this is false.

I'm telling you the Michigan theory was blown to hell.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I'm telling you what I know first hand, and you are telling someone told you something but its a secret.

This is pathetic of you.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

You are not going to tell me something I verified myself.
 
#584
#584
luthervol said:
It's all about the primaries!!!
Click to expand...
not really. unless you maintained your vote in the general election too.

otherwise its "all about the primaries" until you are told to fall in line behind the appointed candidate. you are all about the primaries, when its politically convenient, not when it matters.

heck the Democrats have actively manipulated their primaries twice now. They lied about Joe and appointed Kamala, and kicked out Bernie to make sure Hillary got the support. if you actually cared about the primaries there is no way you would ever vote alongside the party with the worst manipulation of the system.

at least Trump actually won his primaries. Even as the "incumbent" he faced more resistance than Biden or Kamala did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and InVOLuntary
#585
#585
BowlBrother85 said:
You don't know anything first hand. You are trusting debunked theories.
Click to expand...

You don't know jackshit and jack left town. No, I took the Secretary of State's data, which is why they shut it all down. You can keep on saying it but I am a freaking witness. 😂

You might be right, that the data was incorrect, but that means the Secretary of State was manufacturing massive amount of data.
 
#586
#586
McDad said:
I looked for a thread to discuss a sidebar I am about to introduce. I don't want to derail this thread but Matt's post serves as a good launching point.

As part of protected speech I can burn a flag, hang an effigy of a politician, shred a copy of the Constitution, hold a plastic or rubber severed head of a politician.

Here's my question: Can I shoot an effigy of the president with a hunting rifle in a manner that a sniper would do it? Do you think that is an expression of free speech on the same level as the other examples?
Click to expand...
Is Trump the president?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, McDad and Orange_Crush
#589
#589
BowlBrother85 said:
You have absolutely no proof of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election. Simply pointing to Biden being a weak candidate, doesn't prove a damn thing as far as fraud is concerned. Trump was a weak candidate himself.
Click to expand...
Ok let’s see what Democrats say about Dominion voting now. There a lot evidence that had come out now saying otherwise. Everything happens for a reason. Trump not winning in 2020 was actually better.
 
#592
#592
appvol said:
Ok let’s see what Democrats say about Dominion voting now. There a lot evidence that had come out now saying otherwise. Everything happens for a reason. Trump not winning in 2020 was actually better.
Click to expand...

Probably, but damn that Orange bastard had to go through hell and back. Nothing like it in history, whether one likes him or not.
 
#594
#594
BowlBrother85 said:
Is weaponization of the DOJ wrong if Trump does it? Because he definitely is using the DOJ to target his political enemies.
Click to expand...
"Weaponized" is an interesting word to discuss. Are you arguing that politicians should be above the law? A two-tiered system?

If they broke the law, they should not be held responsible? As an administration that invented intel to invent crimes to cover for Hillary's crimes during an election, spy on a rival campaign, and then try to unseat a duly elected president?

It seems that all of that was actual weaponization, and now you're pissed that they are being exposed and held responsible for it?

From my perspective, one of these is not like the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#600
#600
Orange_Crush said:
It seems that all of that was actual weaponization, and now you're pissed that they are being exposed and held responsible for it?
Click to expand...

The sad thing is, I actually they're not pissed --- they just go onto the next loonfest.

Its the same reason why none of them were upset that Slow Joe was removed, they really don't care about any of it like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top