No Kings

#551
#551
BowlBrother85 said:
Isn't that what Donald Trump tried to do after losing the 2020 Presidential Election?

Donald Trump devised a "fake elector" scheme and publicly pressured his Vice President to cast aside electoral college votes, during the formal process of certification, from swing states that they had lost. Was that showing respect for the democratic system of elections in the United States?

The Republican Party has absolutely no moral high ground on which to stand, when it comes to subverting the vote of the American people in a Presidential election.
Click to expand...
I’ll say Trump lost but you are crazy if you think Biden got 81 million votes
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, BreatheUT, SpaceCoastVol and 5 others
#552
#552
LSU-SIU said:
If the blue cities had been working lawfully, but that is a big
Click to expand...
There is no proof that election fraud occurred in the 2020 Presidential Election, to the extent that would have been required to overturn the outcome. Even if you concede the 3 most competitive states that Donald Trump lost in 2020 (Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona) Trump still falls short of the 270 electoral college votes necessary to win a Presidential election.

That is a pathetic defense of Trump's actions.
 
#553
#553
BowlBrother85 said:
There is no proof that election fraud occurred in the 2020 Presidential Election, to the extent that would have been required to overturn the outcome. Even if you concede the 3 most competitive states that Donald Trump lost in 2020 (Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona) Trump still falls short of the 270 electoral college votes necessary to win a Presidential election.

That is a pathetic defense of Trump's actions.
Click to expand...

Well, since we were able to check the voting of dead people in Michigan and I personally was checking until Michigan shut down access I would say you are full of ****.

Regardless, how is this loony strategy working out?
 
#555
#555
BowlBrother85 said:
I agree with you that it's not happening, but I said in that post .... "For the record, I don't think the Supreme Court would rule in favor of Trump seeking a 3rd term in office, so this is all likely moot."

I'm only talking about it, because quite frankly, Republicans are continuing to talk about it so much. I see "Trump 2028" paraphernalia everywhere. I pass by a house in my neighborhood every day that has a "Trump 2028" flag on a pole next to the garage. There are 2 sides to every coin. Republicans never consider both sides of the coin. If serving 3 non-consecutive terms would by some far-fetched means become possible, it is the best thing that could happen for Democrats in 2028.

Republicans should stop treating "Trump 2028" as if it's a threat that scares Democrats ... It doesn't. To the contrary, I would love to see it.
Click to expand...
It isn't happening. Trump knows it isn't happening. I'm not even convinced he wants it to happen. Trump trolls as diversion. He gets his opponents looking at the flashlight beacon over here while he's at work over here.

But to answer your question, Trump's popularity has been on the upswing, and Obama's legacy is being dismantled with every detail released about his administration. I suspect that Obama would not have a chance; he knows it; and would not have the slightest interest in trying.

You guys need to come to grips with the idea that the Dems have imploded. I would be amazed if you sniff any political power within a decade, and then it would take a complete overhaul of your platforms.

You're in a death spiral.

You've sold out to the radical fringe and alienated the vast majority of Americans. Now, having done so, your only draw is to the radical fringe, so you double down on catering to the radical fringe. Which alienates more of the average Americans. Which means that your only draw is to the radical fringe, so you cater harder to those supporters.. Which...

Most Americans know that there are only two genders. Most Americans know that it's wrong to chemically castrate kids. Most Americans know that laying siege to Federal buildings and attempting to assassinate federal officers is destructive to the republic. Most people know that ANTIFA is fascist and not in the slightest against fascism.

We know full well of the Hillary/Obama/Biden corruptions and their weaponizations of the DoJ as a soft coup against a duly elected president. We know that ANTIFA is an attempted color revolution against our own country.

You guys are toast. I am seriously mourning the fact. That's not sarcasm. The only thing worse than this effed up two party system is the effed up one party system we're about to have.

Take a victory lap. Ya'll did this, and you're still supporting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol, BreatheUT and InVOLuntary
#556
#556
LSU-SIU said:
Well, since we were able to check the voting of dead people in Michigan and I personally was checking until Michigan shut down access I would say you are full of ****.

Regardless, how is this loony strategy working out?
Click to expand...
That has been debunked in a documentary on Amazon Prime. You are the one who is full of $hit, and will believe anything that Donald Trump wants you to believe.
 
#557
#557
BowlBrother85 said:
That has been debunked in a documentary on Amazon Prime. You are the one who is full of $hit, and will believe anything that Donald Trump wants you to believe.
Click to expand...

No, it was not debunked which why they shut down access to the public. I personally checked, ME anyone in the public could check.

Regardless, how is all this loony strategy working out?
 
#563
#563
BowlBrother85 said:
You are wrong. That was debunked. I will get the name of that documentary. Hold on.
Click to expand...

The only way that it could be debunked is if the Secretary of State was manufacturing false data. I checked, Me.

Anyone could independently check until they shut it down. I think even the ones I checked never appeared to even have lived in Michigan.

The only way it could be debunked is if the Secretary of State was manufacturing false data on a massive scale. You might be right but the question would remain, why was the Secretary of State providing data that people dead people not in Michigan were applying for and receiving ballots and returning them.
 
#564
#564
McDad said:
Not surprisingly Luther's thoughts are a figment of imagination. I searched for:
+ No Kings protest purpose.
+ No Kings protest meaning.
+ No Kings protest intent.

Every hit was about Trump and Trump Admin. It's hard to reconcile the protest to voting more moderately especially because DJT isn't running again.

Google summary:
The No Kings protests, also known internationally as the No Dictators or No Tyrants protests, is a series of demonstrations, largely in the United States, against what the organizers describe as authoritarian policies of Donald Trump and corruption in his administration.
Click to expand...
The truly hilarious thing is that Canada tried to participate in the No Kings protests, but they had to call it "No Tyrants".

You know... Because they actually DO have a king. lololol

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and McDad
#565
#565
McDad said:
Never would have Trump if Ds ran better candidates. I mean, Joe B couldn't get out of primaries if his life depended on it won. Think about how the public saw Hills and Kamala for them to lose while Joe won.
Click to expand...
I agree.
The biggest problem is with the candidates who won the primaries.
trump should never have won a primary.
 
#566
#566
luthervol said:
I agree.
The biggest problem is with the candidates who won the primaries.
trump should never have won a primary.
Click to expand...

Yes, he should have, he was deemed the best candidate and that proved to be true.

Now, the people you have been voting were just placed in without the party members having a say so.
 
#567
#567
LouderVol said:
But you voted for Biden, and Harris. neither of those were very moderate.

and I am willing to bet you had the exact same argument going back before Trump. you have probably never really supported a moderate option, you have probably always supported the party line. because whomever on the right was too extreme. and you HAD to get this election right, so that the next time you could actually vote for that moderate, but that next time never comes.

don't worry, its the same on the right. they voted for Bush, Cheney, Romney just so Kerry/Obama didn't get elected.

YOU are responsible for the very thing you claim to be against.
Click to expand...
It's all about the primaries!!!
 
#568
#568
LSU-SIU said:
The only way that it could be debunked is if the Secretary of State was manufacturing false data. I checked, Me.

Anyone could independently check until they shut it down. I think even the ones I checked never appeared to even have lived in Michigan.

The only way it could be debunked is if the Secretary of State was manufacturing false data on a massive scale. You might be right but the question would remain, why was the Secretary of State providing data that people dead people not in Michigan were applying for and receiving ballots and returning them.
Click to expand...
You are just wrong .... That has long-since been debunked .... but even if Trump had won Michigan, Georgia and Arizona ... he still loses the election.
 
#572
#572
BowlBrother85 said:
You are just wrong .... That has long-since been debunked .... but even if Trump had won Michigan, Georgia and Arizona ... he still loses the election.
Click to expand...
You are not providing any information. I checked. I independently went through the names and went on the Secretary of States website and verified. I have no real input as to the other states but there is plenty of litigation on those states as well.

Regardless, how is this loony strategy working out?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top