adam.vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2023
- Messages
- 4,048
- Likes
- 6,000
He was told she was underaged and he attempted to pay for sex. He BELIVED she was a child. Open and shut case. Lock his ass up. He's a predatorI can’t believe anything could realistically stick besides the solicitation part, unless the girl was actually a minor. I think everyone has moved past this “identifying as” farce.
Not in these sting operations. They happen all the time. Thing is, if it wasn't a sting, he'd have solicited and had sex with a minor. Which makes him a pedo.I can’t believe anything could realistically stick besides the solicitation part, unless the girl was actually a minor. I think everyone has moved past this “identifying as” farce.
I want to make clear that I am not defending statutory rape. But maybe it’s best to reserve strong judgement until after the trial.The article says she told him she was 16 then he attempted to pay for sex. It's open and shut
See my post. Not defending just presenting a defense. Not open and shut. He reasonably can say “ I did not believe her” and in fact he would be right as it was likely an undercover officer in her 20s. This seems to be common practice for police stings, adding the underage aspect just prior to arrest.The article says she told him she was 16 then he attempted to pay for sex. It's open and shut
Jesus was the only one who needed to die for others sins. In this story, it’s just a man and a police officer.
The man tried to solicit sex from someone who was not under age. End of story.
It’s called being proactive. Better to catch those who would do it early then after the factMy issue on the entrapment thing is that the crime itself in this situation is imaginary. According to the news article, the girl wasn’t 16; The make believe 16 year old is a metro police officer. While these men may have intended to do wrong, they did not.
I'm sure you have links with that information about those stings.Just an observation but they had multiple stings in our area over the years and on each one the police set up a meeting at a hotel as a regular prostitution hookup through online adds. Then once the man arrives they mention that they are underage. This seems to always not result in conviction because they all say that they didn’t believe them and thought they were just saying that to seem less experienced, which I guess seems plausible as the agents are in fact always over 18 and often much older. Who knows what the hell any of them were actually thinking or looking for.
His intent was to have a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl! What part of your pathetic mind does not make that connection?!?! As someone posted before, does he actually have to have sex with the minor before you are satisfied? This was a sting to capture people involved in sexual exploitation of minors. The purpose of a sting in general is to capture a perp in the act of soliciting for or simulated commission of a crime. A sting for thieves would be to have someone set up a job and arrest the suspects when they attempt the robbery. A sting to catch a hit man would be to hire them for a job and arrest them when they show up to make the hit. A sting to catch prostitutes is to have a "john" contact them and then arrest them when the details of the "visit" are discussed. In none of cases was a "crime" commited. I CANNOT FATHOM WHY THIS ACTION OF REMOVING CHILD PREDATOR OFF THE STREETS IS A PROBLEM FOR YOU. THEY HAD PROBABLE CAUSE BUT NOT THE DETAILS OF WHO SPECIFICALLY WAS INVOLVED. I HAVE THREE DAUGHTERS AND SIX GRANDDAUGHTERS. I for one am happy that people with this type of sickness of the soul will not ever be able to harm any of them, even the ones that are adults. When they were sixteen, anyone hurting them in that way would not have needed a sting to remove them.
Some of you have way more experience with this than I do. I read it that they had met on an app and the fictitious age was disclosed after he showed up and they met in person.His intent was to have a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl! What part of your pathetic mind does not make that connection?!?! As someone posted before, does he actually have to have sex with the minor before you are satisfied? This was a sting to capture people involved in sexual exploitation of minors. The purpose of a sting in general is to capture a perp in the act of soliciting for or simulated commission of a crime. A sting for thieves would be to have someone set up a job and arrest the suspects when they attempt the robbery. A sting to catch a hit man would be to hire them for a job and arrest them when they show up to make the hit. A sting to catch prostitutes is to have a "john" contact them and then arrest them when the details of the "visit" are discussed. In none of cases was a "crime" commited. I CANNOT FATHOM WHY THIS ACTION OF REMOVING CHILD PREDATOR OFF THE STREETS IS A PROBLEM FOR YOU. THEY HAD PROBABLE CAUSE BUT NOT THE DETAILS OF WHO SPECIFICALLY WAS INVOLVED. I HAVE THREE DAUGHTERS AND SIX GRANDDAUGHTERS. I for one am happy that people with this type of sickness of the soul will not ever be able to harm any of them, even the ones that are adults. When they were sixteen, anyone hurting them in that way would not have needed a sting to remove them.
Just an observation but they had multiple stings in our area over the years and on each one the police set up a meeting at a hotel as a regular prostitution hookup through online adds. Then once the man arrives they mention that they are underage. This seems to always not result in conviction because they all say that they didn’t believe them and thought they were just saying that to seem less experienced, which I guess seems plausible as the agents are in fact always over 18 and often much older. Who knows what the hell any of them were actually thinking or looking for.