Recruiting Forum Football Talk IX

#48,577
#48,577
Ulysees E. McGill said:
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
Click to expand...
By the letter of the law, Holding happens on essentially every single play. Calling it literally every single play would be an unwatchable product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill and DD4ME
#48,578
#48,578
Ulysees E. McGill said:
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
Click to expand...
Oh gosh, well if AI could potentially favor certain teams over others then I guess we better stick with the SEC refs! At least we know they would never do that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dadof2Vols
#48,584
#48,584
drylo said:
AI could be trained to know when to call it, and once you trained it, it would almost certainly be a tremendous improvement.
Click to expand...
Right, I'm aware. I just have doubts that it would actually work as intended. Especially immediately upon rollout.
 
#48,589
#48,589
RandomUTfan said:
I honestly think the difference in the defense this year vs. last year is largely about how successful our offense has been. It really stresses a defense.
Click to expand...
I heard AP yesterday say our D is averaging around 75 plays per game, and that we might have a flopping injury during our XPs, just to let D catch a little extra break. But now that Hobbs and Moi are back, should help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DD4ME
#48,590
#48,590
Ulysees E. McGill said:
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
Click to expand...
And the games would take 8 hours if AI or sensors or robots called a game bc there is a penalty on damn near every play
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
#48,595
#48,595
I honestly don’t think we get in the cfp at 10-2, unless a lot of dominos fall. With us struggling to beat avg arky and msu teams, and likely no real statement win (assuming we lose to bama), I think the committee will hold it against us
 
  • Like
Reactions: berryvol and Rocky_Top_Vol13
#48,597
#48,597
JCVol00 said:
I honestly don’t think we get in the cfp at 10-2, unless a lot of dominos fall. With us struggling to beat avg arky and msu teams, and likely no real statement win (assuming we lose to bama), I think the committee will hold it against us
Click to expand...

Sankey would burn cfb as we know it to the ground. 10-2 gets in
 
  • Like
Reactions: OptimusPrimerib, Brillovol, tnhunter 10 and 9 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top