Recruiting Forum Football Talk IX

Sensors and AI can't take over officiating soon enough. Humans are just bad at it.
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
 
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
By the letter of the law, Holding happens on essentially every single play. Calling it literally every single play would be an unwatchable product.
 
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
Oh gosh, well if AI could potentially favor certain teams over others then I guess we better stick with the SEC refs! At least we know they would never do that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dadof2Vols
I honestly think the difference in the defense this year vs. last year is largely about how successful our offense has been. It really stresses a defense.
I heard AP yesterday say our D is averaging around 75 plays per game, and that we might have a flopping injury during our XPs, just to let D catch a little extra break. But now that Hobbs and Moi are back, should help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DD4ME
How does AI call subjective things like Holding and PI?...do you really want that dumb crap calling a foul every time guys touch each other?...that would be stupid. We just need well trained officials with transparency...I have seen well called games, actially I've seen a lot of them..it can be done.

Once again though...this is not incompetence, it is corruption using incompetence as a cover.

Oh and computers can also be programmed to cheat and favor a side...it would probably just be better at hiding it.
And the games would take 8 hours if AI or sensors or robots called a game bc there is a penalty on damn near every play
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
I honestly don’t think we get in the cfp at 10-2, unless a lot of dominos fall. With us struggling to beat avg arky and msu teams, and likely no real statement win (assuming we lose to bama), I think the committee will hold it against us

Sankey would burn cfb as we know it to the ground. 10-2 gets in
 
Advertisement



Back
Top