Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

What information about the Epstein files do yall want to see released?

Follow up Q, is that information in the "sealed" files and available for release?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Trump was asked about pardoning Maxwell and said he hadn't thought about it because he hadn't heard her name in so long. But would consider it.

Hadn't heard her name ????

He's such AN OBVIOUS LYING PIECE OF HUMAN EXCREMENT !!!!


Please tell me even you MAGA folks see right through his feigned, "Who? I haven't heard her name in so long," utter bull crap.
"No, I won't pardon my crackhead son Hunter"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
He will if he thinks she will publicly claim he had no role in it. Give him cover. Give him another reason to continue to hide the files and the truth.
Hasn’t she already done that in exchange for the transfer to the country club prison? She didn’t get that for nothing.
 
What information about the Epstein files do yall want to see released?

Follow up Q, is that information in the "sealed" files and available for release?


All of it. Every single scrap of paper, every video, all of it. Redact the names and faces of the victims and blur or otherwise obscure the faces of minors involved in any sex act.

Show us, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, the faces of the abusers.

Including Trump. Including Clinton.
 
All of it. Every single scrap of paper, every video, all of it. Redact the names and faces of the victims and blur or otherwise obscure the faces of minors involved in any sex act.

Show us, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, the faces of the abusers.

Including Trump. Including Clinton.
And how many times has that ever happened?
 
All of it. Every single scrap of paper, every video, all of it. Redact the names and faces of the victims and blur or otherwise obscure the faces of minors involved in any sex act.

Show us, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, the faces of the abusers.

Including Trump. Including Clinton.
Are sealed files in an ongoing investigation typically made available to the public?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
2016 Trump promises his supporters that he is going to go after and lock up Secretary Clinton for her e-mails and after the election doesn't do it.

8 years later he promises his supporters that he is going to release the epstein list that is going to contain prominent Democrat names like President Clinton and after the election doesn't do it.

Do you see any parallels? To me, It almost seems like he was throwing out red meat to people that despise the former president and his wife. Now, I know that that is no where near as fantastical as Trump being a Manchurian candidate or now president Trump being a secret pedophile. But hey, you've road the bus this far, so.........
There's a problem with this logic. Trump can't charge Hillary. He doesn't have that power. He absolutely has the power to release the Epstein files
 
What information about the Epstein files do yall want to see released?

Follow up Q, is that information in the "sealed" files and available for release?
That would be the tricky part. What is still being investigated and what isn't? We would have to take the governments word on what they've released. So I won't trust a damn thing they say no matter who is in charge
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and McDad
There's a problem with this logic. Trump can't charge Hillary. He doesn't have that power. He absolutely has the power to release the Epstein files
The president has the authority to unseal previously sealed evidence???
 
That would be the tricky part. What is still being investigated and what isn't? We would have to take the governments word on what they've released. So I won't trust a damn thing they say no matter who is in charge
I get where you are coming from. But nothing short of the Judge unsealing the evidence is going to allow for the release of the files.

Trump, a known liar, an expert at self promotion, a man routinely making outrageous claims suckered everyone. And now, they legitimately expect him to release something he doesn't have the power to release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
The president has the authority to unseal previously sealed evidence???
The DOJ can petition the court. Which they've done (news to me). LG can kindly STFU IMO.


 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and McDad
The DOJ can petition the court. Which they've done (news to me). LG can kindly STFU IMO.


Welp, there ya go everybody.

I hope VFH's sleuthing has provided yall with some solace in these difficult times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Are sealed files in an ongoing investigation typically made available to the public?


What is sealed and by who? Be precise.

The grand jury transcript is sealed by statute. That can be overcome. The DOJ here knowingly filed pleadings to unseal the transcript where: 1) the motions obviously failed to address the relevant legal standard, i.e. the DOJ took a dive; and 2) the transcripts are 1/10,000th of the whole.

The DOJ was correctly called out by the judges for what was an obvious attempt to pretend to seek disclosure, but it was a gimmick, in reality purposed to deflect from the failure to release the investigative file.

The investigative file is not sealed and no active investigation applies. Trump could order it disclosed right now. It is not sealed.

There is no reason not to release it other than Trump's own subjective desire to hide it.

Why? Be objective for one minute. You know why he's hiding it.
 
What is sealed and by who? Be precise.

The grand jury transcript is sealed by statute. That can be overcome. The DOJ here knowingly filed pleadings to unseal the transcript where: 1) the motions obviously failed to address the relevant legal standard, i.e. the DOJ took a dive; and 2) the transcripts are 1/10,000th of the whole.

The DOJ was correctly called out by the judges for what was an obvious attempt to pretend to seek disclosure, but it was a gimmick, in reality purposed to deflect from the failure to release the investigative file.

The investigative file is not sealed and no active investigation applies. Trump could order it disclosed right now. It is not sealed.

There is no reason not to release it other than Trump's own subjective desire to hide it.

Why? Be objective for one minute. You know why he's hiding it.
Why did Durbin and the dems not release the Epstein flight logs? He said he required the request in writing - why? He got the request and lied about ever receiving it - why? Bondi released them 1 month into her term as AG.

From the article:

“Senator Durbin, I find it very interesting that you refused repeated Republican requests to release the Epstein flight logs in 2023 and 2024. You fought that,” Bondi said. “Did you take money from Reid Hoffman campaign donations, who was a huge Epstein friend? Why did you fight for years? Why did you fight to not disclose the flight logs, Senator Durbin?”

“I can tell you I did not refuse,” Durbin claimed. “One of the senators here wished to produce those logs, and I asked her to put it in writing, and she never did.”

Fox News Digital obtained a Jan. 3, 2024, letter from Blackburn to Durbin pushing him to subpoena unredacted Epstein flight logs.


 
What is sealed and by who? Be precise.

The grand jury transcript is sealed by statute. That can be overcome. The DOJ here knowingly filed pleadings to unseal the transcript where: 1) the motions obviously failed to address the relevant legal standard, i.e. the DOJ took a dive; and 2) the transcripts are 1/10,000th of the whole.

The DOJ was correctly called out by the judges for what was an obvious attempt to pretend to seek disclosure, but it was a gimmick, in reality purposed to deflect from the failure to release the investigative file.

The investigative file is not sealed and no active investigation applies. Trump could order it disclosed right now. It is not sealed.

There is no reason not to release it other than Trump's own subjective desire to hide it.

Why? Be objective for one minute. You know why he's hiding it.
You saw the post by vfh two above yours. Non issue. I will not reply to you further on this matter until new developments brought to light.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Well Mr Whitehouse shut that off. Did she answer the question ?


Dodge.

Did Epstein have photos of Trump with naked underage girls?

Is that what is in the files? Makes a lot of sense. I doubt anyone here would be the least bit surprised.
 
Dodge.

Did Epstein have photos of Trump with naked underage girls?

Is that what is in the files? Makes a lot of sense. I doubt anyone here would be the least bit surprised.
Naked was not the question counselor. Nor did he claim them to be underage. Do better. Seriously your a lawyer?
 
Naked was not the question counselor. Nor did he claim them to be underage. Do better. Seriously your a lawyer?


I'll rephrase.

Would anyone here be genuinely surprised if Trump engaged in sex acts with girls under the age of 18?

Nope. Nobody. And if folks are honest, they pretty much expect it from him. .
 
Advertisement

Back
Top