"No, I won't pardon my crackhead son Hunter"Trump was asked about pardoning Maxwell and said he hadn't thought about it because he hadn't heard her name in so long. But would consider it.
Hadn't heard her name ????
He's such AN OBVIOUS LYING PIECE OF HUMAN EXCREMENT !!!!
![]()
Trump says he’d consider pardons for Ghislaine Maxwell and Diddy
Maxwell’s last-ditch appeal of her sex trafficking conviction was rejected by the Supreme Court on Mondaywww.independent.co.uk
Please tell me even you MAGA folks see right through his feigned, "Who? I haven't heard her name in so long," utter bull crap.
What information about the Epstein files do yall want to see released?
Follow up Q, is that information in the "sealed" files and available for release?
And how many times has that ever happened?All of it. Every single scrap of paper, every video, all of it. Redact the names and faces of the victims and blur or otherwise obscure the faces of minors involved in any sex act.
Show us, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, the faces of the abusers.
Including Trump. Including Clinton.
Are sealed files in an ongoing investigation typically made available to the public?All of it. Every single scrap of paper, every video, all of it. Redact the names and faces of the victims and blur or otherwise obscure the faces of minors involved in any sex act.
Show us, IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES, the faces of the abusers.
Including Trump. Including Clinton.
There's a problem with this logic. Trump can't charge Hillary. He doesn't have that power. He absolutely has the power to release the Epstein files2016 Trump promises his supporters that he is going to go after and lock up Secretary Clinton for her e-mails and after the election doesn't do it.
8 years later he promises his supporters that he is going to release the epstein list that is going to contain prominent Democrat names like President Clinton and after the election doesn't do it.
Do you see any parallels? To me, It almost seems like he was throwing out red meat to people that despise the former president and his wife. Now, I know that that is no where near as fantastical as Trump being a Manchurian candidate or now president Trump being a secret pedophile. But hey, you've road the bus this far, so.........
That would be the tricky part. What is still being investigated and what isn't? We would have to take the governments word on what they've released. So I won't trust a damn thing they say no matter who is in chargeWhat information about the Epstein files do yall want to see released?
Follow up Q, is that information in the "sealed" files and available for release?
I get where you are coming from. But nothing short of the Judge unsealing the evidence is going to allow for the release of the files.That would be the tricky part. What is still being investigated and what isn't? We would have to take the governments word on what they've released. So I won't trust a damn thing they say no matter who is in charge
The DOJ can petition the court. Which they've done (news to me). LG can kindly STFU IMO.The president has the authority to unseal previously sealed evidence???
Welp, there ya go everybody.The DOJ can petition the court. Which they've done (news to me). LG can kindly STFU IMO.
![]()
Justice Department asks federal court to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
The Justice Department asked a federal court on Friday to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epstein’s case at the direction of President Donald Trump amid a firestorm over the administration's handling of records related to the wealthy financier.www.pbs.org
Are sealed files in an ongoing investigation typically made available to the public?
Why did Durbin and the dems not release the Epstein flight logs? He said he required the request in writing - why? He got the request and lied about ever receiving it - why? Bondi released them 1 month into her term as AG.What is sealed and by who? Be precise.
The grand jury transcript is sealed by statute. That can be overcome. The DOJ here knowingly filed pleadings to unseal the transcript where: 1) the motions obviously failed to address the relevant legal standard, i.e. the DOJ took a dive; and 2) the transcripts are 1/10,000th of the whole.
The DOJ was correctly called out by the judges for what was an obvious attempt to pretend to seek disclosure, but it was a gimmick, in reality purposed to deflect from the failure to release the investigative file.
The investigative file is not sealed and no active investigation applies. Trump could order it disclosed right now. It is not sealed.
There is no reason not to release it other than Trump's own subjective desire to hide it.
Why? Be objective for one minute. You know why he's hiding it.
You saw the post by vfh two above yours. Non issue. I will not reply to you further on this matter until new developments brought to light.What is sealed and by who? Be precise.
The grand jury transcript is sealed by statute. That can be overcome. The DOJ here knowingly filed pleadings to unseal the transcript where: 1) the motions obviously failed to address the relevant legal standard, i.e. the DOJ took a dive; and 2) the transcripts are 1/10,000th of the whole.
The DOJ was correctly called out by the judges for what was an obvious attempt to pretend to seek disclosure, but it was a gimmick, in reality purposed to deflect from the failure to release the investigative file.
The investigative file is not sealed and no active investigation applies. Trump could order it disclosed right now. It is not sealed.
There is no reason not to release it other than Trump's own subjective desire to hide it.
Why? Be objective for one minute. You know why he's hiding it.
Naked was not the question counselor. Nor did he claim them to be underage. Do better. Seriously your a lawyer?