Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

Oh, I see what you're saying. Thanks for the distinction. See how not a big deal it is to try to get to the truth with me? I'm not trying to trick anybody. I just want the truth. I'll come back months after the fact and correct myself on something I was wrong about when nobody called me out. I just want good info.

But still, to wish it were an immigrant just so you can say it's not a Utahn. WTF. Nobody will care that it's a Utahn but an immigrant would set things off.
Bwaaaaa
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Would you disagree if I said the CRM expedited those things but they would have come to fruition naturally even without the CRM?
When naturally? It wouldn't have happened in the 1970s or 1980s. Maybe SOME by the 1990s. It's important to remember the fact they are a minority. Should have happened at the end of the Civil War. It was much too late by the 1960s
 
You asked if I were even alive in the 60s. I wasn’t, but I assume you made that statement because you were. If so, I would hope a man of your age would have matured enough to actually understand a nuanced argument rather than making these emotionally charged and disingenuous arguments based on statements you first intentionally took out of context and then intentionally seemed to misunderstand.
Nuanced argument? 🤭

You sure you know what that means? It's not just about context, it's about nuance of the context itself. Ex.: If Kirk would have applied specificity to a provision within the Civil Rights Act, then that would be a nuanced argument. X was speaking specifically about certain provisions of it so that's entirely different. The fact that Kirk has promoted the theory of Great Replacement adds to the radicalism. It's ok though. He was a good guy, albeit a bit misguided, but stuck to his own beliefs and gave young, right wing Christian conservatives a voice. His words shouldn't have gotten him killed. It's a tragedy and I pray for his wife and children.

Suggesting X and CK shared similar reflections a total lack of nuance to their comments
 
Last edited:
I see the advantage for political elites to divide. Emotional "purchasing" of votes.

How does it benefit economic elites to foment division?
Good question. They benefit bc it’s all distraction. While we fight one another they rob us blind. And then you have ppl voting for their own demise bc they support a handful of cultural issues that they use as smoke screens to cover other nefarious unpopular policies. Like tax cuts for the rich.
 
Can’t speak for Christians but with Messianic Judaism the man is the head of the household.

That sounds great to be the man right?
Wellllllllll,
If I delegate a decision and it goes wrong then whose fault is it? It’s mine. The fault always falls on me …..every damn time.

We are called to love our wife’s like Messiah loves us. Messiah died for us. The wife of a true G-d fearing man is a good place to be. If anyone doesn’t believe me then ask the Ginger what she thinks when I am not around.

We believe every word of this. Also believe that any sin my kids committed before they reached the age of accountability is on MY tab as well as any sins committed in my home. Scripture says all of these things. A man is responsible for his home and family in the eyes of God and will be held to account.

Also what you said about a man loving his wife as Christ loves the Church and died for it is both true and a serious endeavor. Christ also lived his life in service TO the Church. We are called to serve God and serve our wives in a loving manner. Seems like you and Red have a great family man. Happy for you. I am just a sinner and have fallen short in all of these things from time to time. It takes a lot of work and patience. Good post Slice.
 
The assertion being that Charlie Kirk wasn’t fascist enough? On a scale of 1 to Hitler he was only registering a Mussolini?

That what we’re going with here as the shooter’s rationale?

on one hand, CK was a notorious hate monger; otoh, he was a puss at being a hate monger. makes sense
 
When naturally? It wouldn't have happened in the 1970s or 1980s. Maybe SOME by the 1990s. It's important to remember the fact they are a minority. Should have happened at the end of the Civil War. It was much too late by the 1960s
I don't know, when. Would be very difficult to predict. I think mid to late 80s is reasonable. My rationale is that is when the political shift took place in the south.
 
Good question. They benefit bc it’s all distraction. While we fight one another they rob us blind. And then you have ppl voting for their own demise bc they support a handful of cultural issues that they use as smoke screens to cover other nefarious unpopular policies. Like tax cuts for the rich.
Is there an example of an economic elite "robbing us blind" while we are distracted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volanta
The assertion being that Charlie Kirk wasn’t fascist enough? On a scale of 1 to Hitler he was only registering a Mussolini?

That what we’re going with here as the shooter’s rationale?
Just read this. Or stay willfully ignorant. I don't really care.

 
BREAKING NEWS!!!
K-town Vol Fan admits celebrating Kirk's death!!!


See how taking a few words from your sentence stating you are in fact not celebrating can change the entire outlook? Quit cherry picking words someone said from an entire conversation to fit a narrative you, not the person who said them, wants.

I'm waiting for the next round of posts from the resident liberal spin masters, mocking Kirk's widow and her remarks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
so the leftists/marxists think CK got what he deserved for being a fascist & the ultimate maga fascist assassin killed CK for not being fascist enough.... got it
Yes

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Just read this. Or stay willfully ignorant. I don't really care.


okay I'll try to walk through this. you posted something from David Shuster that claimed the cops and interviews with the family that the shooter was far right of Kirk. notice he mentions no source for this; provides no link and there is no reporting out there apart from him that this is true.

your Groyper theory is grounded in this

"A Facebook photo in which Robinson appears to reference a Groyper meme has led to early speculation that Kirk’s killing may have been an outgrowth of these intra-far-right skirmishes. "

Even the article you posted says this is inconclusive.

meanwhile reporting has come out that people that knew him said he had shifted left and became increasingly political (to the left) - I posted an article from the Guardian (hardly a right wing rag) with such information.

you are being duped.
 
okay I'll try to walk through this. you posted something from David Shuster that claimed the cops and interviews with the family that the shooter was far right of Kirk. notice he mentions no source for this; provides no link and there is no reporting out there apart from him that this is true.

your Groyper theory is grounded in this

"A Facebook photo in which Robinson appears to reference a Groyper meme has led to early speculation that Kirk’s killing may have been an outgrowth of these intra-far-right skirmishes. "

Even the article you posted says this is inconclusive.

meanwhile reporting has come out that people that knew him said he had shifted left and became increasingly political (to the left) - I posted an article from the Guardian (hardly a right wing rag) with such information.

you are being duped.
okay I'll try to walk through this. you posted something from David Shuster that claimed the cops and interviews with the family that the shooter was far right of Kirk. notice he mentions no source for this; provides no link and there is no reporting out there apart from him that this is true.

your Groyper theory is grounded in this

"A Facebook photo in which Robinson appears to reference a Groyper meme has led to early speculation that Kirk’s killing may have been an outgrowth of these intra-far-right skirmishes. "

Even the article you posted says this is inconclusive.

meanwhile reporting has come out that people that knew him said he had shifted left and became increasingly political (to the left) - I posted an article from the Guardian (hardly a right wing rag) with such information.

you are being duped.
So you believe he was raised conservative country boy, his entire family was Republicans, he goes to college (at one of the most conservative schools in one of the most conservative states in the country) for 1 semester, less than 6 months, and comes out radical left? That's more likely than becoming more radical right? I mean I get you really want it to be true, but the odds don't look great.

Either way, me and you are going my side vs your side is what caused all this ****. I hate politics. I hate its become this WWE reality BS I want my wrestler and faction to win at all costs. I wish we could all just be Americans with minor disagreements again.

We're all Americans, we all love the Vols, I would have a beer with any one y'all irl because of those 2 things.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top