SugarCC
Gntlmen, u cant fight here, this is the war room!
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 9,294
- Likes
- 44,777
We “should” be, but there is absolutely zero way the voters will admit they were wrong and that we have a top 10-15 team.My guess on top 5 in new football rankings.
1.Ohio State for the fact they beat the preseason #1 team.
2. Penn State
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Texas, probably won't drop out of top 5 after losing a close game on the road to OSU..
Tennessee should be Top 10-15..
Exactly why I hate preseason polls. Pollsters refuse to admit they are wrong and don’t make big changes after week 1 which is why it takes weeks for some teams to drop out or rise in the poll.We “should” be, but there is absolutely zero way the voters will admit they were wrong and that we have a top 10-15 team.
There's little evidence we do or do not have a top 15 team. It's been one game against a probably horrific team that won't make a bowl.We “should” be, but there is absolutely zero way the voters will admit they were wrong and that we have a top 10-15 team.
Exactly why I hate preseason polls. Pollsters refuse to admit they are wrong and don’t make big changes after week 1 which is why it takes weeks for some teams to drop out or rise in the poll.
While I agree that rankings this early in the season are guesswork and ridiculous, if you were going to have preseason polls based on nothing, then the polls after week one need to be based off of the games that were played. Based off of the games and teams that I watch, we are a top 10 to 15 team. There is absolutely zero way Alabama should be ranked ahead of us when the polls come out, but (if I gambled) I would pretty much put my house on it that they will be. There is absolutely zero way that Indiana and Michigan should be ranked ahead of us, but they will be. I will reiterate it… If you’re going to have preseason rankings based on absolutely nothing except for who is on the roster and the stars behind their name, then week one rankings have to be based on week one games.There's little evidence we do or do not have a top 15 team. It's been one game against a probably horrific team that won't make a bowl.
Making any conclusions about any team who won is just guesswork after one game. Rankings this early are beyond silly.
Maybe not entirely, but to a certain degree they matter when it comes to national TV exposure and media attention early in the season. You want the media talking about your team. Being an underdog that nobody talks about was fine for what the program was 4 or 5 years ago, but now we probably want the spotlight. More attention leads to more nationally televised games, more buzz around the program, and it helps with recruiting.These polls don’t matter anyway. The rankings as of right now are just for discussion topics and nothing more.
Syracuse is probably a 6-6 or 5-7 team this season by looking at their schedule. This weekend vs Connecticut will be the difference whether Syracuse makes a Bowl Game or not..There's little evidence we do or do not have a top 15 team. It's been one game against a probably horrific team that won't make a bowl.
Making any conclusions about any team who won is just guesswork after one game. Rankings this early are beyond silly.
DeBoer was stupid to take that job...he was never going to succeed there. He should have been like Campbell at Iowa State and just stayed at Washington forever.Legend said on The Paul Finebaum Show that the talk is behind closed doors DeBoer has no control over the team. Players do whatever they want.
Man, I really hate to hear that![]()