MAD
Arsenal FC, Detroit Lions
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 57,566
- Likes
- 148,049
There are many sides. And the demonization of Jewish people because they want a homeland where it exists is in itself a form of bigotry, if not racism.It pretty much says it all that the priority for one side is dying, starving, mutilated children, and the other side is freaking out about Jewish-Americans who are off the Zionist "plantation," to borrow a buzzword from the right.
And it's been that way this whole time. People are dying in large numbers and in America the discussion has been "wahh Zohran didn't condemn 'globalize the intifada', we are so unsafe here in scary New York City"It pretty much says it all that the priority for one side is dying, starving, mutilated children, and the other side is freaking out about Jewish-Americans who are off the Zionist "plantation," to borrow a buzzword from the right.
If you are gonna quote me, quote the whole post, it didn’t get past me that you took most of it out.You said there are no innocent lives in Gaza, you should take a break from accusing anyone of spreading "propaganda" (and probably a break from the Internet in general)
Then I responded to someone I respect.There are no innocent lives in Gaza,
Don’t talk to me about starvation, humanitarian aid.
Hamas made a starving hostage dig his own grave on video.
You saw it.
You remained silent.
They are starving, they are torturing, humiliating.
Sexually brutalizing and murdering Israeli hostages.
And you and the others are….But yeah, yeah but Israel.
SHUT UP.
THIS IS ALL ON HAMAS
Laughing, mocking, soulless.
Because of Hamas, people will die, many people will die.
You are right RW.
100%, all the babies are innocent, every single one.
That’s why I said. It’s child abuse bringing up babies in that environment. I wish there was a way to get the babies out of there. Even in Nazi Germany there were Germans that helped Jews. There are things that the People of Gaza could do, have you heard of a single case of an Arab in Gaza helping one? They are complicit. They rather see the entire state of Israel annihilated and all the Jewish babies murdered, than care for their own babies.
None of that changes a thing about what I said, lol. You said it, and when I flagged it you doubled down and said it again, and then eventually you said babies are innocent (wow, groundbreaking) because it apparently took several different people mentioning it to you for it to cross your mind that babies might be innocent, with no comment on any other innocent civiliansIf you are gonna quote me, quote the whole post, it didn’t get past me that you took most of it out.
I stand by what I said.
Then I responded to someone I respect.
You'd have a point if Hamas gave up the hostages. But as long as you defend people holding hostages and the people providing them aid you're failing to use common sense.
I understand what you're getting at and agree to some extent. But considering this is guerilla warfare in an urban/densely populated area civilian deaths are inevitable.
Necessary or proportionate aren't part of the calculus. Removing Hamas is the objective. Hamas has embedded itself among under and behind Palestinians.
Given the stated goal of removing Hamas how would you prosecute this conflict if you had the control?
Not trying to play gotcha, just wanting to see if there are means or strategies I hadn't considered.
I remember in the mid-to-late 2000's there was a bunch of anti-American sentiment regarding our foreign policy. Never for a second did I get mad at the world and try to blame the victim card and act like the world was bigoted against Americans like me.
I was mad at our government for tarnishing America's reputation.
Y'all are barking up the wrong tree. It's Bibi, stupid. He's the problem.
Saying proportionality “isn’t part of the calculus” concedes the core problem. Guerrilla warfare in cities makes civilian harm more likely, but that doesn’t make every civilian death unavoidable or acceptable. Arguing that it’s inevitable risks excusing tactics that could be changed to reduce harm, and shifting the focus to whether a critic can design a perfect war plan avoids answering whether the current one meets basic moral and legal standards.
You can absolutely criticize Israel without being antisemitic however theres plenty of people that can’t do that without using antisemitic dog whistles, just as there’s plenty of people that cry antisemitism when it’s not there. Both are wrong and should be called out for itCorrect, no country is absolved of criticism, especially by it’s own citizens. We can criticize the leadership of this country without being anti American, and we can criticize the leadership of Israel without being anti semitic. Hence why the weaponization of anti semitism as a political defense tactic is continuing to fall on deaf ears.
Hamas started this war, butchering about 1,200 Israelis and taking hundreds of hostage.It pretty much says it all that the priority for one side is dying, starving, mutilated children, and the other side is freaking out about Jewish-Americans who are off the Zionist "plantation," to borrow a buzzword from the right.
The idea that the war would end if Hamas released the hostages is a classic oversimplification. It ignores the deeper political, territorial, and military objectives at play, the history of conflicts persisting after demands are met, and the likelihood that operations or reprisals could continue regardless.
Israel has thousands of Palestinian hostages so I'm sure you have that same energy for themStill defending keeping innocent people hostage, disgusting.
THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR TAKING/KEEPING HOSTAGES. Fight the war if you must but keeping hostages justifies whatever happens to you and your people.
In many cases, they did, for things like waving a Palestinian flag. Many other cases (over 4,000) of "administrative detention" which is indefinite despite no charges being broughtCan you be more specific? Are you claiming that Israel just picked these innocent Palestinians off the street and imprisoned them?