CobbVol
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 5,278
- Likes
- 10,440
It looks like they took the nominee under advisement , but did not provide consent. Given his tenure as AG, it is a good thing for our country that he did not make a SC Justice. Jack Sekulow explains it pretty good in the article I linked.Lol, what part of to "advise and consent" involves refusing to hold hearings on the president's nominees?