Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 51,860
- Likes
- 51,487
I didn't know a high altitude nuclear detonation had a much larger range for emp pulse until your post. Thanks.
The military campaign has been a disaster for Russia plain and simple. Even France would have conquered Ukraine by now.
I'd be willing to bet an Army or Marine division would slice through a Russian corps like a hot knife through soft butter.Russia is having their way with Ukraine, as RAS and myself said they would from day one. This isnt slurping but recognizing reality.
Whatever it is, it isn't working. It is time for Vlad to bring in the French and North Koreans at the same time. Euro Asian 3 some!You have no clue what you are talking about. The goal was never to conquer Ukraine. Putin has said that over and over since the beginning. It is why Russia still operates under a SMO and not a declared war.
I'd be willing to bet an Army or Marine division would slice through a Russian corps like a hot knife through soft butter.
The Russians are not going to like our air cover. Not one bit.
You want to drive America insane, detonate a high altitude EMP weapon and fry every cell tower in the country. I've said for years that's what I would do instead of hijacking airliners. We'd lose our ****ing minds. Can you imagine the teenage insanity without TikTok? Adderall sales would skyrocket.I didn't know a high altitude nuclear detonation had a much larger range for emp pulse until your post. Thanks.
Defending Russia's success in Ukraine is weak. I can't recall the private army leader Putin was using who mysteriously died after pulling his troops from Ukraine, but Putin has looked weak in that war since the start.Ukraine had large numbers of western trained troops to start the war, had numbers advantages in defending cities like Mauripol and what happened?
Defending Russia's success in Ukraine is weak. I can't recall the private army leader Putin was using who mysteriously died after pulling his troops from Ukraine, but Putin has looked weak in that war since the start.
I don't frequent politics but I assume you're a Russian apologist for some reason unknown to me because citing the Ukraine as a success for the Russian ground forces is laughable.
Then, after saying Russia has the "best forces," you explain away the early losses by saying Ukraine had "Western trained troops" then. Well, if Russian troops are the best, why'd they have such issues with those troops.
I suspect you just shill for Russia no matter what and perhaps have Russian roots. Enjoy yourself in that but their leader Putin is a terrible war manager. He's probably the cagiest KGB operative in the world but a terrible manager of military might.