Iran

#2,601
#2,601
KB5252 said:
Fair enough, just wondered if maybe there was some act of terror possible. While it can't be ruled out those flags wouldn't make me suspicious.
Click to expand...
I'm just curious what communication might be like in the canal at this moment. And given the above post by Smokey, if any of these vessels are dealing with signal issues. I suspect Iran probably plays pretty loose with such things, they are the country, after all, that mined international waters during the Iran/Iraq war in the 80's, which resulted in our country destroying their meager navy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KB5252
#2,604
#2,604
KB5252 said:
That possibility is not lost on me. But maybe he sees the landscape and knows we are on the precipice of WW3 right now and is trying to avoid entering the event horizon.......... I'm not convinced either way yet.
Click to expand...
Well he's the one pushing toward the precipice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#2,605
#2,605
Vol8188 said:
Look through his posts. One of his first in this thread is basically saying he doesn’t believe the claims about nuclear weapons and that “the blood is on the hands of Israel”.

Now he comes by to inform us anytime Iran successfully hits anything or to let us know about civilians in Iran that have been killed.

His schtick is obvious.
Click to expand...
Like your schtick isn't.
 
#2,606
#2,606
EasternVol said:
Well he's the one pushing toward the precipice.
Click to expand...
That's one possibility, the other is that Iran is extremely close to a nuclear weapon, the IAEA seems to agree. And that would start an arms race in a region with centuries old axes to grind........... Not to mention give the most prolific state sponsor of terror the means start a chain of events that end us all.

You may be right, but the other possibility is just as likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, norrislakevol, UT_Dutchman and 1 other person
#2,609
#2,609
speculating that Iran has sped up there bomb making to use it. Might be what’s got Trump concerned.
 
#2,614
#2,614
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo, marcusluvsvols, norrislakevol and 1 other person
#2,617
#2,617
EasternVol said:
Well he's the one pushing toward the precipice.
Click to expand...

Russia abandoned Assad. Russia has abandoned Iran too. They’re not in any position to escalate.

Continuing to remove Russian pawns from the board, is the right move.

Between the fall of Assad and the dramatic weakening of Iran and their various proxies, we are seeing a massive shift in international power away from the East and towards the West.

Not surprising though that you’d be opposed to that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volbucky and Volsdeep4
#2,619
#2,619
KB5252 said:
That's one possibility, the other is that Iran is extremely close to a nuclear weapon, the IAEA seems to agree. And that would start an arms race in a region with centuries old axes to grind........... Not to mention give the most prolific state sponsor of terror the means start a chain of events that end us all.

You may be right, but the other possibility is just as likely.
Click to expand...

Not only does the IAEA agree, Iran openly admits to 60% enrichment.

He’s just upset one of his BRICS has fallen
 
#2,620
#2,620
Vol8188 said:
Russia abandoned Assad. Russia has abandoned Iran too. They’re not in any position to escalate.

Continuing to remove Russian pawns from the board, is the right move.

Between the fall of Assad and the dramatic weakening of Iran and their various proxies, we are seeing a massive shift in international power away from the East and towards the West.

Not surprising though that you’d be opposed to that
Click to expand...
Except that the objective isn't and hasn't been to remove Russian pawns. It's to eliminate possible military threats to Israel. Why I am not surprised that you'd frame it dishonestly? That's right, it's because it's what you do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#2,622
#2,622
#2,623
#2,623
EasternVol said:
Except that the objective isn't and hasn't been to remove Russian pawns. It's to eliminate possible military threats to Israel. Why I am not surprised that you'd frame it dishonestly? That's right, it because it's what you do.
Click to expand...

Those two are the same.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top