SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 55,911
- Likes
- 70,023
The two-party system gives us two choices. One side is fringe left, open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc.. and will not have a shred of fiscal responsibility. The other side is not for open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc... and will likely not be fiscally responsible.because you wouldn't vote for them. you would rather vote party line for a "winner".
overtime the longer you accept, by voting for them, bad actions from the GOP they are going to get further and further away from what you want. the only way to fix it is to stop voting for them until they give you someone you actually support. it also means going out and supporting that small guy. its worth it in the long run, because you would avoid the mess we are in now.
but no, all of you snowflakes would rather vote for a winner and get the instant gratification of backing a winner like Mitch McConnell rather than stand by someone who you would actually like to represent you.
Are you seriously describing the Democratic Party of 2025 as fringe left?The two-party system gives us two choices. One side is fringe left, open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc.. and will not have a shred of fiscal responsibility. The other side is not for open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc... and will likely not be fiscally responsible.
We could refuse to vote on principal, and implicitly vote for the fringe left. Or we can vote for the only other choice that most closely aligns with our values.
Y'all can save your breath trying to lecture us.
first, I don't vote, but my issue going beyond the candidates.What did you accomplish by voting for a guy who got 2% of the Senate vote in Georgia? I won't even go into what he got in the Presidential vote. He was an insignificant player in the Presidential election. You might as well have written in George Washington.
You're making my point. Fiscal conservatives had nowhere to turn 'cause neither Trump nor Kamala were fiscal conservatives. Even if they were there's precious few in Congress
![]()
Elon Musk rages 'Trump would have lost election' as rift between pair explodes
Elon Musk slammed Donald Trump's "ingratitude" on X on Thursday in a now-deleted post that claimed Trump "would have lost the election" without his help and that Democrats would control both chambers of Congresswww.themirror.com

you know most of the left is the exact same? stuck in the two party system that doesn't represent them. just voting for the least bad option.The two-party system gives us two choices. One side is fringe left, open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc.. and will not have a shred of fiscal responsibility. The other side is not for open borders, abortions, child-genital-mutilations, etc... and will likely not be fiscally responsible.
We could refuse to vote on principal, and implicitly vote for the fringe left. Or we can vote for the only other choice that most closely aligns with our values.
Y'all can save your breath trying to lecture us.
Chase Oliver was the sexiest candidate I’ve seen in a long time. I was aligned with close to 95% of what he was advocating.because you wouldn't vote for them. you would rather vote party line for a "winner".
overtime the longer you accept, by voting for them, bad actions from the GOP they are going to get further and further away from what you want. the only way to fix it is to stop voting for them until they give you someone you actually support. it also means going out and supporting that small guy. its worth it in the long run, because you would avoid the mess we are in now.
but no, all of you snowflakes would rather vote for a winner and get the instant gratification of backing a winner like Mitch McConnell rather than stand by someone who you would actually like to represent you.