Trump throws America's $44 Billion education business into chaos by Halting ALL Student Visas
....
Donald Trump has waged war on elite universities, accusing them of ....
It is long past time that we rid our political conversations about policy differences of the language of "war."
In a time where we are witnessing the horrors of war, with the resulting disease, starvation, and the deaths of thousands of innocents, including those combatants whose only choice is to die on the battlefield or to die because they are unwilling to go to the battlefield, we should not equate the struggle for life over death in conflict zones to our disagreements over public policy.
War is a terrible, terrible thing. It is so terrible that every reasonable alternative should be used before the decision to wage war is the only decision left. It is so terrible that the only way war should be waged is with overwhelming, horrific, repugnant use of force so that the worst consequences may be swift and conclusive, resulting (hopefully) in less total suffering than a protracted conflict would inflict..
Categorizing public policy decisions over such things as hiring criteria, university funding decisions, or debate over the extent or application of social safety net programs into the language of war cheapens the value of the human lives impacted by both combatants and civilian populations and desensitizes us to the actual real consequences of war; consequences that are decisive, irreversible, and final to those who bear the brunt of the brutality.
There are better arguments to be made. Yesterday was Memorial Day. For those who paused to remember those lost, why do we cheapen their sacrifice and our memory by co-opting the language of the battlefield to try to score political points regarding ever-shifting winds of popular policy?
*FP, though I have replied to your post, this is not directed at you. Your post just got me going because of the warfare language it included. I know it wasn't your original language.