President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

Are you trying to claim you’ve never seen Trump supporters be critical of him?
On the politics forum of Volnation? It depends on who you are talking about .... @hog88 , @NorthDallas40 are critical of him all the time. @volfanhill is so critical of him that sometimes you might think he was a Democrat (sometimes).

However, the next post I read from @W.TN.Orange Blood which is remotely critical of Donald Trump .... will be the first time that I have ever seen him be critical of Donald Trump.
 
Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin to Restore Censored Medical Articles Removed for Mentioning ‘LGBTQ’ People


Lol. I’m sure they’ll get right on it. It’ll be there when you get back from your next alien abduction. Tell them VN says high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VAVol85
Lol. I’m sure they’ll get right on it. It’ll be there when you get back from your next alien abduction. Tell them VN says high.
Probably right.

The Trump Administration doesn't truly care about acts of government censorship, or about upholding the First Amendment rights of American citizens, as they have previously claimed to.

It has been become evident that the Trump Administration believes that the United States Constitution should only be respected, when the matter at hand serves their agenda.
 
Probably right.

The Trump Administration doesn't truly care about acts of government censorship, or about upholding the First Amendment rights of American citizens, as they have previously claimed to.

It has been become evident that the Trump Administration believes that the United States Constitution should only be respected, when the matter at hand serves their agenda.

They removed it from a government website. They didn't say they couldn’t display it anywhere else. Typical looney leftist propaganda.
 
Had Hillary been elected, maybe she would have changed tax codes, however...

Have no idea what MSN talking points are,.I've never seen any of that programming. My thought are my own.

Thanks to snap and other cuts soon more poor kids of any color will wake up hungry and go to bed hungry. But no where in America will parents watch as thier children die of hunger.That is happening now in Sudan. But tax breaks for the ruling class resulted in canceling USAID.

DOGE has not saved America one cent, and I would argue has cost us money.
😂🤡
 
They removed it from a government website. They didn't say they couldn’t display it anywhere else. Typical looney leftist propaganda.
It's more complicated than that.

The website was created by the government, but it does not exist only for the use and private consumption of government officials. It is also intended for public use and public consumption, as well, for public academic and medical dialogue.
 
It's more complicated than that.

The website was created by the government, but it does not exist only for the use and private consumption of government officials. It is also intended for public use and public consumption, as well, for public academic and medical dialogue.

Actually it’s not. They are free to post it anywhere they want to assuming it’s their platform or someone who agrees to post it.
 
Actually it’s not. They are free to post it anywhere they want to assuming it’s their platform or someone who agrees to post it.
The plaintiffs asserted that the government violated the First Amendment, while trying to comply with a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act. The Administrative Procedure Act requires agencies to create opportunities for the public to comment on proposed rules and regulations before implementing them.

"The plaintiffs are likely to succeed in proving that the removal of their articles was a textbook example of viewpoint discrimination by the defendants in violation of the First Amendment. "

-- U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorkin


Judge Sorkin continued further ....

"The First Amendment forbids such discrimination in all fora, but the necessity for the rule is perhaps most obvious in a case like this -- where the speech at issue constitutes the scientific, medical views of experts."

-- U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorkin


You are not arguing with me. You are arguing with a District Judge's interpretation of the First Amendment.
 
Last edited:
On the politics forum of Volnation? It depends on who you are talking about .... @hog88 , @NorthDallas40 are critical of him all the time. @volfanhill is so critical of him that sometimes you might think he was a Democrat (sometimes).

However, the next post I read from @W.TN.Orange Blood which is remotely critical of Donald Trump .... will be the first time that I have ever seen him be critical of Donald Trump.
Fair
 
On the politics forum of Volnation? It depends on who you are talking about .... @hog88 , @NorthDallas40 are critical of him all the time. @volfanhill is so critical of him that sometimes you might think he was a Democrat (sometimes).

However, the next post I read from @W.TN.Orange Blood which is remotely critical of Donald Trump .... will be the first time that I have ever seen him be critical of Donald Trump.
Always keep the crazy demented hate for Trump you have going & I'll be the opposite of your lunacy. The things Trump does for this country is far better than anything a crazy Biden or any anti-american hating Democrat could ever do to improve this country. Don't worry if or when I may criticize this POTUS you worry about your own sanity of being in that loony Dem cult. Excuse me for even talking to a crazy demented Trump hating trog like you. I need a long hot shower now. I try to stay away from arguing w/other posters in this thread bc it does nobody any good. I like to post my stuff & get out & not deal w/Trump hating scum like you.
 
Last edited:
The plaintiffs asserted that the government violated the First Amendment, while trying to comply with a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act. The Administrative Procedure Act requires agencies to create opportunities for the public to comment on proposed rules and regulations before implementing them.

"The plaintiffs are likely to succeed in proving that the removal of their articles was a textbook example of viewpoint discrimination by the defendants in violation of the First Amendment. "

-- U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorkin


Judge Sorkin continued further ....

"The First Amendment forbids such discrimination in all fora, but the necessity for the rule is perhaps most obvious in a case like this -- where the speech at issue constitutes the scientific, medical views of experts."

-- U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorkin


You are not arguing with me. You are arguing with a District Judge's interpretation of the First Amendment.

God forbid anyone disagree with an activist district judge.
 
God forbid anyone disagree with an activist district judge.
Setting the First Amendment aside .... it is being hyper-sensitive of the federal government to be deleting references to "LGBTQ." that have been made by doctors, while discussing health care. That isn't being "woke."

Was it wrong for doctors to say that gay men were in an at-risk population, while commenting on the AIDS hysteria in the late 1980's? This is crazy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol

Trump Administration Sent Team to Investigate Free Speech Violations in Britain: Report​


1748227995737.png
The Trump administration reportedly dispatched a team to meet with victims of Britain’s draconian speech restrictions amid growing concerns over the state of liberty in the United Kingdom.

A group of five diplomats from the U.S. State Department were recently sent on a fact-finding mission in March to Britain to meet with pro-life activists who have been arrested for silently praying outside abortion clinics in the UK, The Telegraph reports.

The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) team also met with UK Foreign Office officials and members of the Ofcom broadcasting regulator, which was recently empowered to police speech on the internet in Britain by the controversial Online Safety Act.

 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol
Setting the First Amendment aside .... it is being hyper-sensitive of the federal government to be deleting references to "LGBTQ." that have been made by doctors, while discussing health care. That isn't being "woke."

Was it wrong for doctors to say that gay men were in an at-risk population, while commenting on the AIDS hysteria in the late 1980's? This is crazy.

So no law broken or right infringed just making rulings based on alleged “hyper-sensitivity”.
 
Where was Scott Pelley the last 4 years when nobody (Biden) was running our country?
Yeah, he wanted all his lunatic Democrat buddies to pat him on the back for not criticizing of the Biden's/Harris Admin. He didn't want to be canceled by the radical left wing party.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top