šŸ˜Ž (it's about to go down)

I would be very surprised if it’s Rice, I think yall are reading TK’s post incorrectly. He’s not saying the player has ties to Gillespie, he was saying possibly even ā€œtiedā€ with Gillespie as far as impactful

Is that guy tied to the one you are referring to?

6.5 kinda low to be on par with Gillespie imo
 
I would be very surprised if it’s Rice, I think yall are reading TK’s post incorrectly. He’s not saying the player has ties to Gillespie, he was saying possibly even ā€œtiedā€ with Gillespie as far as impactful

I mean I can’t think of many options left on the table that would be as impactful as JaKobi except for maybe Wilkinson (who signed elsewhere) or Boogie Fland (who is almost certainly going to demand insane NIL and is likely headed to Florida).

Those are the only top tier names I can really think of right now. Not sure Claude fits the bill of as impactful as JaKobi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: berryvol
So with mystery commit #1 tomorrow, what does that put us at numbers wise?

Would someone have to go to get mystery guy #2?

If we get both mysteries, where does Gainey fit if he’s allowed to return?

So many questions.
 
So with mystery commit #1 tomorrow, what does that put us at numbers wise?

Would someone have to go to get mystery guy #2?

If we get both mysteries, where does Gainey fit if he’s allowed to return?

So many questions.
At 12 currently, 1 tomorrow would technically be 13 and at the limit, but most think the roster is going to 15 in the next couple weeks, so who knows.
 
My read is that we have a mystery depth’ish piece locked up who will commit tomorrow and are pursuing the ā€œgame changerā€ piece whose status is promising for us but uncertain. That’s taken from a highlight reel of posts from the three amigos - SF, BTO and TK.

Does not seem to meet the Barnes callout up the thread. Don’t see him taking in a yawner.
 
Not even sure how you get signings before the roster rule clears, so official announcements of commitment tomorrow and rumored commitment during dead period seems weird unless they really switch to 15 soon.

I keep on saying minutes minutes minutes but with TWO adds + maybe Gainey to get to 15, I just don't see how the numbers shake out. Hurst will be grandfathered in so the 16 players isn't the problem, it's where do you find time for TWO new additions and, if both are guards, where do you find time for those PLUS Gainey and Abram.

PG: Gillespie / Boswell / Henderson
SG: "Yuri 2.0" / Gainey / "6.5" / Abram / Hurst
SF: Ament / Evans / Massamba
PF: Carey / Phillips
C: Okpara / Estrella / Brown
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeannaVol
What is the rotation, then?

Guards: Gillespie, "Yuri", Gainey, "6.5", Abram
*** No way Boswell settles for zero minutes ***

SF: Ament
***Massamba AND Evans both only getting token minutes, especially if you go more 3 guard to accommodate the names above???***

Frontcourt: Carey, Phillips, Okpara, Estrella

Removing Hurst, Boswell, Massamba, Evans, Brown, and Henderson still puts you at a ten man rotation which, I guess fine, but I don't see a world where Boswell/Massamba/Evans all just get no minutes.
 

VN Store



Back
Top