GroverCleveland
22nd & 24th POTUS; Predecessor to 45 and 47.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2017
- Messages
- 7,097
- Likes
- 13,347
Actually, I would not mind having an electric push mower. Have a couple of areas that are too big for the weed eater, but too small for the regular mower. Have a gas one that currently isn't starting and needs some TLC I've not done.
Kind of like saying no one did squat about complaints regarding the federal government until Tim McVey.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've not seen anything from the usual crowd screaming their heads off, any acknowledgement there is a problem with Chinese trade and that no one until Trump has attempted to do squat about it. He may be wrong and we'll find out, but at least he knows there are problems and has a course of action.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've not seen anything from the usual crowd screaming their heads off, any acknowledgement there is a problem with Chinese trade and that no one until Trump has attempted to do squat about it. He may be wrong and we'll find out, but at least he knows there are problems and has a course of action.
It's a delay tactic.Loading…
www.cnbc.com
Trump tariffs face major legal hurdle as federal trade court hears challenge
not sure how any merit to this case when tariffs have been used for centuries
Perception vs. reality. Every president of this century has been aggressive with China.
Not only did Biden maintain Trump's term 1 tariffs, he added his own new ones.
Obama did more to challenge Chinese practices with the WTO than any president ever.
Bush famously with steel tariffs, but there were others.
I'm calling it right now. Trump's going to get us a ****** long-term deal with some kind of terms in it that make it look like China will take IP laws seriously, it'll be as flimsy as always, and he'll claim victory.
You're saying the "plan" is to bring high skill manufacturing jobs back home. But really, and they said so explicitly, it's for all manufacturing, even the low value stuff. Jobs which even the Chinese labor market is becoming too expensive for.It’s pretty obvious that he misspoke saying “country” instead of “company”.
But what’s up with the gotcha guy’s tweet? “Trump floats the idea of a 100% on toys from Mattel which refers to as a country”
If I had kids that actually played with tactile dolls rather than virtual ones on their phones, I would buy them as many as they wantedI cleaned out some of my house this weekend. I have three kids. When Trump says maybe we don't need 8-9 Barbies, I think he has a point. Also, from an environment perspective, the current system is pretty destructive.
I was wondering why a 3Ahr battery made sense I missed the 120V so ok that is how it makes it feasible. And I was wondering when we’d start seeing higher operating voltages on the higher power battery tools.It's not an important part of our business but it was something we were trying to grow. Not sure anybody else has 120v, so it has its appeal
Going to disagree with you here. Trump has been far more aggressive with China than anyone else and it's not close. Obama did make noise about Chinese practices, but nothing happened for a distant second.Perception vs. reality. Every president of this century has been aggressive with China.
Not only did Biden maintain Trump's term 1 tariffs, he added his own new ones.
Obama did more to challenge Chinese practices with the WTO than any president ever.
Bush famously with steel tariffs, but there were others.
I'm calling it right now. Trump's going to get us a ****** long-term deal with some kind of terms in it that make it look like China will take IP laws seriously, it'll be as flimsy as always, and he'll claim victory.
Going to disagree with you here. Trump has been far more aggressive with China than anyone else and it's not close. Obama did make noise about Chinese practices, but nothing happened for a distant second.
I do not recall the Bush steel tariffs, but did that manage to only get us cheap low-quality Chinese steel?
You're saying the "plan" is to bring high skill manufacturing jobs back home. But really, and they said so explicitly, it's for all manufacturing, even the low value stuff. Jobs which even the Chinese labor market is becoming too expensive for.
Aren’t Barbie’s around $20?
I’m sure that the manufacturing process is highly automated, so the Barbie doll making jobs in modern facilities are going to be well paying ones.
Mattel might be an extreme example of spending a lot of money on foreign payrolls while funding them by selling into the US consumer market. They’d probably not be singled out if their sales mix more mirrored their CapEx investment footprint.
IMO Trump could be suggesting making an example out of Barbies since almost every American understands what they are.
Anything to hurt China is good as far as I’m concerned.
Apple stock is a large investment for me personally. I’d be better off if they continued making and selling all of those iPhones in China. I’m taking a hit by keeping my investment in AAPL as they pivot away from that model.