NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 26,890
- Likes
- 10,447
That’s accurate, no refute as my first question was why did he have a knife at school. Where in the conversation do I have to give equal time? My next response was how does a 5 year old know they were racially abused. Regroup, reread and comeback."Nice reach" but you didn't even try to refute what I said because it's true
You’re struggling now. Which part of me calling her a white POS using a racial slur is “excusing her behavior?” As an American you can be a racist piece of crap, all races have it. Which is a concept you’re not grasping. And as an American you have the right to a trial. You’re correct, they are not the same…one child gets to move forward not knowing at 5 years of age he was part of a viral moment of divide while another child is dead.
You struggle at gaslighting. There is no excusing her behavior, which has been established. One of us has condemned both while the other is making excuses using terms like “may have”.One is a 5 year old and 100% innocent of any wrongdoing other than being a child. The other is a high school football player that may have instigated a fight with another teenager. You keep trying to equate the two situations when they are nothing alike and that's why I keep saying you are excusing her behavior.
Based on the facts as have been reported by police and witnesses do you find his claims of self defense plausible?I didn't know the trial already happened and he was convicted? All I've said is I'm reserving judgment until the legal process ends. He's claiming he's innocent and acted in self-defense. And last I checked we live in America where you're innocent until proven guilty.
The white woman on the other hand, admitted on camera she called a black child the N word and is now being rewarded financially for it. You claim nobody is making excuses for her but she's somehow raised nearly $700k as a result of calling a child the N word. And you don't seem to be condemning her and the people supporting her. Instead you're turning this into a referendum on Karmelo Anthony who will have his day in court. That looks like an excuse to me.
Why do you keep repeating the victim was a football player? I find that very odd...... Especially considering both played football.One is a 5 year old and 100% innocent of any wrongdoing other than being a child. The other is a high school football player that may have instigated a fight with another teenager. You keep trying to equate the two situations when they are nothing alike and that's why I keep saying you are excusing her behavior.
I don't really care that he had a knife. But it is what he did in the steps leading up to the homocide, and why, that is concerning. My leaning is he went looking for trouble and found it:because in this case, not looking twice got someone murdered. Which goes back to the original comment why did he have a knife?
That’s how I view it. Provoked the situation, it escalated enough to bring out a hidden knife. Saying “touch me and see what happens” per eye witness accounts.I don't really care that he had a knife. But it is what he did in the steps leading up to the homocide and why that is concerning. My leaning is he went looking for trouble and found it:
(based on what I have read about it)
Went into another team's area.
Was asked to leave and refused.
(asked again and maybe told to leave?) Issued a threat.
When confronted (and reports are mixed as to whether the victim laid hands on him), Decided to pull out a knife and fatally stab the other in the chest.
He found trouble.
I won't attribute motive to his statements. But it sounds very similar to the wording and phrasing the family spokesperson has used.I was wondering the same. Trying to establish one as the brut aggressor and the other as a weak feeble victim.
I have to ask, and maybe I missed something, but does the fact that 5 year old may not have known she was being racially abused change anything? Does it make it less offensive or hurtful? I really don't' understand.That’s accurate, no refute as my first question was why did he have a knife at school. Where in the conversation do I have to give equal time? My next response was how does a 5 year old know they were racially abused. Regroup, reread and comeback.
But you already knew all that because you took time to take inventory on what I wrote.
