That's racist!

[C-south]

What??? Utter nonsense

I guess he had to write a book for you. It’s not self defense when you bring a weapon when they’re prohibited and you instigate an unnecessary confrontation.

 

[ButchPlz]

What I mainly get this is that people want to justify/ignore terrible people's behavior bc "look what they did." Some of yall need some help. Let me break it down for you:

The person who murdered the other person is a shat bag. The people who donated to his go fund me are terrible people.

The lady calling a child the N word is a shat bag. The people donating to her go fund me are terrible people.

Yes, murder is far worse. Stupid to even debate that.

Those trying to justify either of this are lost humans. And that's me being kind

Anyone so sensitive to call someone a "shat bag" for using a six-letter word in reaction to bad acting is the real lost human here, and an outright embarrassment to everyone.

Nobody needs help. Many are sick and tired of watching one very loud part of the population hoot and holler in justification of criminal activity (riots, massive and organized breaking and entering campaigns, organized carjacking, organized ATM fraud, theft, murder, and apparently sexual assault and pedophilia, considering the animal recording the video) on account of some perceived "oppression" - presumably because they're subject to horrifying and awful six-letter words- when that part of the population has more widespread organizational/systemic support than any population in all of human history yet still manages to pump out drastically higher rates of crime, violence, and idiocy like supporting murdering dogs and spitting in the face of victims trying to show grace than anyone else in the US.

Argue all you want, but the perception is there, and you yourself just established your perception of the two actions as comparable by calling them both "shat bags" even if you paradoxically go on to say murder is far worse. A murderer that kills like Karmelo did is an animal that belongs under the prison and is far beyond a "shat bag". A person that uses a slur is someone with poor taste that doesn't deserve anywhere close to the same treatment nor a label that is close to the same.

As someone else said- every action gets an equal and opposite reaction. I'll disagree- if we had an equal and opposite reaction, things in this country would be very ugly with restraint let go in the same way it's been let go by certain other groups.

 

[volfanhill]

Anyone so sensitive to call someone a "shat bag" for using a six-letter word in reaction to bad acting is the real lost human here, and an outright embarrassment to everyone.

Nobody needs help. Many are sick and tired of watching one very loud part of the population hoot and holler in justification of criminal activity (riots, massive and organized breaking and entering campaigns, organized carjacking, organized ATM fraud, theft, murder, and apparently sexual assault and pedophilia, considering the animal recording the video) on account of some perceived "oppression" - presumably because they're subject to horrifying and awful six-letter words- when that part of the population has more widespread organizational/systemic support than any population in all of human history yet still manages to pump out drastically higher rates of crime, violence, and idiocy like supporting murdering dogs and spitting in the face of victims trying to show grace than anyone else in the US.

Argue all you want, but the perception is there, and you yourself just established your perception of the two actions as comparable by calling them both "shat bags" even if you paradoxically go on to say murder is far worse. A murderer that kills like Karmelo did is an animal that belongs under the prison and is far beyond a "shat bag". A person that uses a slur is someone with poor taste that doesn't deserve anywhere close to the same treatment nor a label that is close to the same.

As someone else said- every action gets an equal and opposite reaction. I'll disagree- if we had an equal and opposite reaction, things in this country would be very ugly with restraint let go in the same way it's been let go by certain other groups.

Seek professional help. I don't think the two are even comparable but that's the hill some want to die on. Take that up with them. But there should be no place on earth where calling a child a slur is accepted, excused, or justified.

 

[ButchPlz]

Seek professional help

Why would I? I can at least articulate something better than "shat bag", typically don't contradict my own bad points in my own posts, and bother to provide decent responses. I can't help that you don't like the "reverse cancellation" that's going on.

 

[volfanhill]

Why would I? I can at least articulate something better than "shat bag", typically don't contradict my own bad points in my own posts, and bother to provide decent responses. I can't help that you don't like the "reverse cancellation" that's going on.

Good luck sir. Share your thoughts with your religious leader. I don't have a problem with "reverse cancellation." I have a problem with people justifying someone calling a child slur.

 

[ButchPlz]

Good luck sir

Only fools and lazy people need "luck". Which are you?

EDIT: what kind of buffoon can't get his one-sentence thought out without major edits?

 

[Majors]

What??? Utter nonsense

How many weapons did you take to school? A knife in Knox county get you suspended for one year.

 

[utvolpj]

How many weapons did you take to school? And knife in Knox county get you suspended for one year.

HS? No one would have looked twice at a knife. Even guns several times. Why?

 

[Majors]

HS? No one would have looked twice at a knife. Even guns several times. Why?

because in this case, not looking twice got someone murdered. Which goes back to the original comment why did he have a knife?

 

[utvolpj]

because in this case, not looking twice got someone murdered. Which goes back to the original comment why did he have a knife?

How many millions of times had a knife enter a school without being used? Seems like an irrelevant point

Maybe he didn't know it was a knife free zone and wouldn't have brought it if he did....

 

[ButchPlz]

Good luck sir. Share your thoughts with your religious leader. I don't have a problem with "reverse cancellation." I have a problem with people justifying someone calling a child slur.

I have simply told you point blank why you are seeing the response you are. I haven't justified calling a child a slur. I told you why people are.

I simply find it hard to care about a child's hurt feelings on a pedophile's video considering several other current events. One's in bad taste and doesn't actually harm anyone, and the other, well...causes a lot of harm to a lot of people.

 

[Majors]

How many millions of times had a knife enter a school without being used? Seems like an irrelevant point

Maybe he didn't know it was a knife free zone and wouldn't have brought it if he did....

Nice deflection. Stupidity isn’t valid, athletes know they can’t bring weapons to events…same for the POS woman in the park.

 

[UTFanForLife]

Same reason people carry guns. Self defense. If he was experiencing long term bullying at the hands of this big football player he could have feared for his life and looked for the only weapon he had access to.

I know yall wanna make black people out to be these scary violent monsters but this Karmelo kid looked like a nerd. While the white kid was your All-American good looking popular high school football player. It's usually the popular jock that's bullying the other kids in school.

Now I don't know what happened and if lethal force was justified. All I know is just based on the two kids backgrounds it's plausible to me that the jock was bullying the nerd and the nerd was finally fed up and stood up for himself.

They didn’t even go to the same school. From what I have read, which I admit is not much, they got into an argument because Karmelo Anthony was at the wrong school tent. Nothing I have read has stated anything got physical, although it could have and I just have not seen it, before Karmelo stabbed Austin in the chest.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Dad would be dad. Believe under the scenario you stated is what would you do, if someone called my 5 year one daughter that? Isn’t that the issue, how others react?

I don't know what you're getting at. But the point of that comparison was to show that how the child takes the insult is irrelevant. What is relevant is if anyone insults your child you as the parent would be offended. You wouldn't brush it off as the kid is too young to understand so no harm no foul.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Anyone so sensitive to call someone a "shat bag" for using a six-letter word in reaction to bad acting is the real lost human here, and an outright embarrassment to everyone.

Nobody needs help. Many are sick and tired of watching one very loud part of the population hoot and holler in justification of criminal activity (riots, massive and organized breaking and entering campaigns, organized carjacking, organized ATM fraud, theft, murder, and apparently sexual assault and pedophilia, considering the animal recording the video) on account of some perceived "oppression" - presumably because they're subject to horrifying and awful six-letter words- when that part of the population has more widespread organizational/systemic support than any population in all of human history yet still manages to pump out drastically higher rates of crime, violence, and idiocy like supporting murdering dogs and spitting in the face of victims trying to show grace than anyone else in the US.

Argue all you want, but the perception is there, and you yourself just established your perception of the two actions as comparable by calling them both "shat bags" even if you paradoxically go on to say murder is far worse. A murderer that kills like Karmelo did is an animal that belongs under the prison and is far beyond a "shat bag". A person that uses a slur is someone with poor taste that doesn't deserve anywhere close to the same treatment nor a label that is close to the same.

As someone else said- every action gets an equal and opposite reaction. I'll disagree- if we had an equal and opposite reaction, things in this country would be very ugly with restraint let go in the same way it's been let go by certain other groups.

So you want to make a 5 year old child the example for your frustration?

How bad a person do you have to be to think it's justified to hurt a child to advance a political agenda. Once again nobody would care if this was adult on adult. The thing that is bothering us decent humans is the fact people are supporting a woman who did this to a child. A child. That's the point.

 

[Majors]

I don't know what you're getting at. But the point of that comparison was to show that how the child takes the insult is irrelevant. What is relevant is if anyone insults your child you as the parent would be offended. You wouldn't brush it off as the kid is too young to understand so no harm no foul.

You asked a question to the question. I gave an answer and you did not. You’ve defended Karmelo as “self defense” but claim you don’t know all the information. But go all in on the POS white woman for her racial slur to a child. Is it safe to say you’re part of the problem too? You seem to only see race. Earlier you said decent white people won’t say it but have yet to condemn the murder of a high school kid by a black teenager. A decent person condemns both and doesn’t see color but heinous acts.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

You asked a question to the question. I gave an answer and you did not. You’ve defended Karmelo as “self defense” but claim you don’t know all the information. But go all in on the POS white woman for her racial slur to a child. Is it safe to say you’re part of the problem too? You seem to only see race. Earlier you said decent white people won’t say it but have yet to condemn the murder of a high school kid by a black teenager. A decent person condemns both and doesn’t see color but heinous acts.

Because I don't know all the information in the Karmelo Anthony case I am reserving judgment. I am neither condemning the kid nor am I saying he's innocent. All I said is he claims he was acting in self-defense and that I'll withhold judgment until the facts are presented in court.

The white lady on the other hand has not denied that she used a racial slur at the 5 year old kid. She has been brazen and defiant. That's why I and other decent people are condemning her. There's a difference between someone claiming they are innocent and someone being defiant and brazen in their racial attack of a young kid.

If you can't see the difference then you might be part of the problem with race relations in this country.

 

[Majors]

Because I don't know all the information in the Karmelo Anthony case I am reserving judgment. I am neither condemning the kid nor am I saying he's innocent. All I said is he claims he was acting in self-defense and that I'll withhold judgment until the facts are presented in court.

The white lady on the other hand has not denied that she used a racial slur at the 5 year old kid. She has been brazen and defiant. That's why I and other decent people are condemning her. There's a difference between someone claiming they are innocent and someone being defiant and brazen in their racial attack of a young kid.

If you can't see the difference then you might be part of the problem with race relations in this country.

Believe you could say Karmelo was brazen and defiant under your own definition. Being asked to leave, wrong place and continued to be defiant. Your answer tells me all I need to know about your views. Which goes back to what I said, you’re part of the problem and see color to skew your view. You had a chance to condemn a murder and opted to take a soft stance of “self defense” in a verbal altercation, not physical. It’s pretty simple to condemn murder just as it’s pretty simple to condemn a racial slur. But here you are.

 

[whodeycin85]

Believe you could say Karmelo was brazen and defiant under your own definition. Being asked to leave, wrong place and continued to be defiant. Your answer tells me all I need to know about your views. Which goes back to what I said, you’re part of the problem and see color to skew your view. You had a chance to condemn a murder and opted to take a soft stance of “self defense” in a verbal altercation, not physical. It’s pretty simple to condemn murder just as it’s pretty simple to condemn a racial slur. But here you are.

I'll bet if the 5 year old shot the lady he would be claiming self defense for the kid...I think we need to stop giving words power...they only have meaning to weak minded people who are already mentally ill..actions mean more then words..sooner the US sticks to that the better society will be

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Believe you could say Karmelo was brazen and defiant under your own definition. Being asked to leave, wrong place and continued to be defiant.

Being an a-hole to a teenager ain't the same as being racist to a 5 year old kid. I'm not saying Karmelo is an angel and did nothing wrong. He did a lot wrong for another kid to be dead. But so did the white kid who confronted him. It's an awful situation all around. I'm just not gonna condemn him as a murderer when I don't have all the facts and he's claiming self-defense. If it turns out it wasn't self-defense then throw him under the jail. I'm not here caping for him just cause he's black. I just believe in innocent until proven guilty.

The situation with the white woman and the 5 year old black kid is totally different. Nobody is denying any of the facts in that case. The black kid tried to take her kid's stuff and she called him a racial slur. Nobody is saying something different happened. What is being argued is whether her behavior was warranted. I would argue no decent person can say what she did was right even if the kid wasn't autistic and older than 5 years old. What we're troubled by is the fact so many white people have supported her actions to the tune of over $600k thus far. That's the issue here. That some white folk think saying racial slurs at 5 year old black children warrants giving money to.

 

[Majors]

Being an a-hole to a teenager ain't the same as being racist to a 5 year old kid. I'm not saying Karmelo is an angel and did nothing wrong. He did a lot wrong for another kid to be dead. But so did the white kid who confronted him. It's an awful situation all around. I'm just not gonna condemn him as a murderer when I don't have all the facts and he's claiming self-defense. If it turns out it wasn't self-defense then throw him under the jail. I'm not here caping for him just cause he's black. I just believe in innocent until proven guilty.

The situation with the white woman and the 5 year old black kid is totally different. Nobody is denying any of the facts in that case. The black kid tried to take her kid's stuff and she called him a racial slur. Nobody is saying something different happened. What is being argued is whether her behavior was warranted. I would argue no decent person can say what she did was right even if the kid wasn't autistic and older than 5 years old. What we're troubled by is the fact so many white people have supported her actions to the tune of over $600k thus far. That's the issue here. That some white folk think saying racial slurs at 5 year old black children warrants giving money to.

Nobody is making excuses for the white woman and her actions but you’re doing a lot of dancing in validating murder. Noticed you decided to list her amount raised but chose not list Karmelo. Again, you see color and are part of the problem.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

Nobody is making excuses for the white woman and her actions but you’re doing a lot of dancing in validating murder. Noticed you decided to list her amount raised but chose not list Karmelo. Again, you see color and are part of the problem.

I didn't know the trial already happened and he was convicted? All I've said is I'm reserving judgment until the legal process ends. He's claiming he's innocent and acted in self-defense. And last I checked we live in America where you're innocent until proven guilty.

The white woman on the other hand, admitted on camera she called a black child the N word and is now being rewarded financially for it. You claim nobody is making excuses for her but she's somehow raised nearly $700k as a result of calling a child the N word. And you don't seem to be condemning her and the people supporting her. Instead you're turning this into a referendum on Karmelo Anthony who will have his day in court. That looks like an excuse to me.

 

[Majors]

I didn't know the trial already happened and he was convicted? All I've said is I'm reserving judgment until the legal process ends. He's claiming he's innocent and acted in self-defense. And last I checked we live in America where you're innocent until proven guilty.

The white woman on the other hand, admitted on camera she called a black child the N word and is now being rewarded financially for it. You claim nobody is making excuses for her but she's somehow raised nearly $700k as a result of calling a child the N word. And you don't seem to be condemning her and the people supporting her. Instead you're turning this into a referendum on Karmelo Anthony who will have his day in court. That looks like an excuse to me.

May want to reread my tone towards her. Called her a POS, not sure how you view that term. So more dancing by you which can’t do the same to Karmleo. Again, you haven’t mentioned his amount nor have you condemned him reaching into a bag to grab a knife killing another person. Almost as if he’s vindicated in doing it or owed the right. She’s a racist plan and simple, and anyone who donated can be viewed as much. Anyone who donated to Karmelo should be viewed as such by supporting a murderer. A little less dancing in your race baiting and more accountability.

 

[Dobbs 4 Heisman]

May want to reread my tone towards her. Called her a POS, not sure how you view that term. So more dancing by you which can’t do the same to Karmleo. Again, you haven’t mentioned his amount nor have you condemned him reaching into a bag to grab a knife killing another person. Almost as if he’s vindicated in doing it or owed the right. She’s a racist plan and simple, and anyone who donated can be viewed as much. Anyone who donated to Karmelo should be viewed as such by supporting a murderer. A little less dancing in your race baiting and more accountability.

Once again I'm an American. So I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Karmelo Anthony has not been convicted of anything yet. He's claiming self-defense. I trust our legal system to administer justice. If he's guilty throw him under the jail. However, what I won't do is simply assume guilt. Which is what you're doing.

And you are excusing her behavior despite what you say because you keep bringing up this totally unrelated situation rather than simply keeping the conversation to her. It doesn't matter how much you want to connect these two situations. They are not the same. One involves an on-going criminal case while this woman admitted on camera that she called a black child the N word.

 

[Majors]

Once again I'm an American. So I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Karmelo Anthony has not been convicted of anything yet. He's claiming self-defense. I trust our legal system to administer justice. If he's guilty throw him under the jail. However, what I won't do is simply assume guilt. Which is what you're doing.

And you are excusing her behavior despite what you say because you keep bringing up this totally unrelated situation rather than simply keeping the conversation to her. It doesn't matter how much you want to connect these two situations. They are not the same. One involves an on-going criminal case while this woman admitted on camera that she called a black child the N word.

You’re struggling now. Which part of me calling her a white POS using a racial slur is “excusing her behavior?” As an American you can be a racist piece of crap, all races have it. Which is a concept you’re not grasping. And as an American you have the right to a trial. You’re correct, they are not the same…one child gets to move forward not knowing at 5 years of age he was part of a viral moment of divide while another child is dead.