The Deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

#576
#576
NashVol11 said:
Forgot you believe a brown person can't wear a Bulls hat without being a gang member
Click to expand...

Lmfao that’s clearly what it is.

El Salavdorian man. Arrested with other El Salvadorian men who are members of MS-13. He’s wearing multiple items of clothing frequently worn by MS-13 members, a gang from El Salvador.

But if you’re a dishonest leftist “he’s just a brown man who loves the bulls!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#577
#577
Vol8188 said:
Lmfao that’s clearly what it is.

El Salavdorian man. Arrested with other El Salvadorian men who are members of MS-13. He’s wearing multiple items of clothing frequently worn by MS-13 members.

But if you’re a dishonest leftist “he’s just a brown man who loves the bulls!”
Click to expand...
Since you put it in quotes, who said that? I said the MS-13 case is flimsy because it is, and you feel compelled to keep proving me right because you apparently, and amusingly, think Jesse Watters' "someone who likes the Bulls? From El Salvador? Yeah right" was a compelling point
 
#580
#580
NashVol11 said:
Since you put it in quotes, who said that? I said the MS-13 case is flimsy because it is, and you feel compelled to keep proving me right because you apparently think Jesse Watters' "a Bulls fan? From El Salvador? Yeah right" was a compelling point
Click to expand...

I’m just looking for honesty, which you seem to be incapable of.

El Salvadorian man, arrested wearing multiple articles of gang related clothing. Arrested with multiple other gang members.

Is the most likely answer:

A. He probably just loves the Chicago Bulls
Or
B. He’s probably a gang member

The fact that you continue to pretend he’s not a likely gang member should be embarrassing to you
 
#581
#581
Vol8188 said:
I’m just looking for honesty, which you seem to be incapable of.

El Salvadorian man, arrested wearing multiple articles of gang related clothing. Arrested with multiple other gang members.

Is the most likely answer:

A. He probably just loves the Chicago Bulls
Or
B. He’s probably a gang member

The fact that you continue to pretend he’s not a likely gang member should be embarrassing to you
Click to expand...
If the best evidence available is that he was wearing a Bulls hat and see no evil hoodie while standing at Home Depot in broad daylight, the most likely answer is not that he's a gang member lmfao. That's why the Trump admin never claimed he was one until after they f***ed up, which is classic CYA
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy, tvolsfan, EasternVol and 1 other person
#582
#582
Vol8188 said:
I’m just looking for honesty, which you seem to be incapable of.

El Salvadorian man, arrested wearing multiple articles of gang related clothing. Arrested with multiple other gang members.

Is the most likely answer:

A. He probably just loves the Chicago Bulls
Or
B. He’s probably a gang member

The fact that you continue to pretend he’s not a likely gang member should be embarrassing to you
Click to expand...

I keep telling them these gags don't work anymore. 🤷‍♂️ He's illegal and gone.... good. Maybe Trump will get tired of hearing about this and just drop a bomb on the guy's head.

Hellfire-R9X-missile-1-1024x667-1.jpg
 
#583
#583
NashVol11 said:
If the best evidence available is that he was wearing a Bulls hat and see no evil hoodie while standing at Home Depot in broad daylight, the most likely answer is not that he's a gang member lmfao. That's why the Trump admin never claimed he was one until after they f***ed up, which is classic CYA
Click to expand...

Now you’re back to outright lies.

So he’s wearing 2 pieces of gang attire and arrested with a group of men 2 others of which were MS-13 members.

And that’s all simply coincidental? 2 articles of clothing consistent with that gang, 67% of the men he was arrested with also gang members.

Coincidental?

Honestly, I’d be ashamed of myself if I were being as intellectually dishonest as you are right now. This is sad
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#584
#584
Vol8188 said:
Now you’re back to outright lies.

So he’s wearing 2 pieces of gang attire and arrested with a group of men 2 others of which were MS-13 members.

And that’s all simply coincidental? 2 articles of clothing consistent with that gang, 67% of the men he was arrested with also gang members.

Coincidental?

Honestly, I’d be ashamed of myself if I were being as intellectually dishonest as you are right now. This is sad
Click to expand...
You making a bad argument and not getting anywhere with it doesn't mean I'm lying lmao. I notice you went back from 1 MS-13 member to 2 again, that is the lie you're looking for. Or seeing me reference explicitly the Bulls hat and see no evil hoodie but being unable to refer to those articles of clothing as anything but "2 pieces of gang attire" because they don't sound threatening otherwise lol
 
#585
#585
He might be a gang member. This is not one of the top several concerns with this case. If you are making this argument, you are either

1) a xenophobe
2) a partisan hack who knows it's a bad defense but has to say something
3) too stupid to understand it's a bad point

Pick one

If he got dueprocess, nobody would know his name. That's how you know "he might he a gang member" is a dumbass defense. If you can't fathom this and go back to "he was a gang banger" then you are an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan and EasternVol
#586
#586
NashVol11 said:
You making a bad argument and not getting anywhere with it doesn't mean I'm lying lmao. I notice you went back from 1 MS-13 member to 2 again, that is the lie you're looking for
Click to expand...

Not a lie. One was a known gang member. The second had MS-13 tattoos.

If someone hangs out with Ms-13 gang members and has MS-13 tattoos, I hate to tell you, but the reality is “that’s a gang member too”.

There’s an x% chance anyone is wearing one piece of clothing that can be associated with any specific gang. The odds of two pieces that both go with the same gang, is very low. The odds you’re doing and arrested with 3 men and 2/3 are members of that exact same gang whose clothing you’re just by chance wearing…..almost 0.

Why do you refuse to accept reality here?
 
#587
#587
n_huffhines said:
He might be a gang member. This is not one of the top several concerns with this case. If you are making this argument, you are either

1) a xenophobe
2) a partisan hack who knows it's a bad defense but has to say something
3) too stupid to understand it's a bad point

Pick one

If he got dueprocess, nobody would know his name. That's how you know "he might he a gang member" is a dumbass defense. If you can't fathom this and go back to "he was a gang banger" then you are an idiot.
Click to expand...

It’s not xenophobic, not stupid to want to deport MS-13 members.

He’s had more due process than anyone in this forum
 
#588
#588
n_huffhines said:
If he got dueprocess, nobody would know his name. That's how you know "he might he a gang member" is a dumbass defense. If you can't fathom this and go back to "he was a gang banger" then you are an idiot.
Click to expand...
He actually had multiple chances for due process, what are you referring too?

Actually, it is my understanding in the immigration process he was identified as a gang member. Although its possible he could further challenged (habeas) whether was in the gang as part of Proclamation but he didn't do that. Whether he was a gang member, wife beater, or other is not material... everyone is in agreement nor did he contest that he is illegal and subject to removal and/or deportation.
then you are an idiot.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

You have to realize that nobody can take this to mean anything, you had no idea that harboring criminals was a criminal offense. I don't know how that's possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#589
#589
n_huffhines said:
He might be a gang member. This is not one of the top several concerns with this case. If you are making this argument, you are either

1) a xenophobe
2) a partisan hack who knows it's a bad defense but has to say something
3) too stupid to understand it's a bad point

Pick one

If he got dueprocess, nobody would know his name. That's how you know "he might he a gang member" is a dumbass defense. If you can't fathom this and go back to "he was a gang banger" then you are an idiot.
Click to expand...

It’s not xenophobic, not stupid to want to deport MS-13 members.

He’s had more due process than anyone in this

If it were such a bad argument as you’re claiming you’d simply take it off the table by saying “yes, he’s most likely a gang member; but he still should not have been sent to El Salvador”. In which case we’d agree.

But that ruins the false narrative this story is designed to set up. That they’re just deporting these loving father’s for no reason
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
#590
#590
Vol8188 said:
It’s not xenophobic, not stupid to want to deport MS-13 members.

He’s had more due process than anyone in this forum
Click to expand...

He's just parroting what they tell him to say but he has no ability to actually have a real discussion because he has no idea what any of this means.
 
#596
#596
NashVol11 said:
Forgot you believe a brown person can't wear a Bulls hat without being a gang member
Click to expand...

And an illegal invader is afraid to be deported back to his homeland because he fears for his life from the gang that he is a part of here.
 
#599
#599
n_huffhines said:
All kind of people in tech saying this is definitely photoshop
Click to expand...
From what I understand the tattoo is real, but they superimposed the "interpretation" of the tattoo. He doesn't have the letters "M S 1 3" tattooed on his fingers. The problem is the WH, because they only have the "best" since they eliminated DEI, didn't explain that.
 
#600
#600
NashVol11 said:
If the best evidence available is that he was wearing a Bulls hat and see no evil hoodie while standing at Home Depot in broad daylight, the most likely answer is not that he's a gang member lmfao. That's why the Trump admin never claimed he was one until after they f***ed up, which is classic CYA
Click to expand...
That seems to be their SOP. They came in very late on Mahmoud Khalil with some extra baseless accusations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top