The Deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

#376
#376
EasternVol said:
The topic is domestic abuse. Thanks for playing.
Click to expand...

Well, you’re wrong on that one too. A witness is not “hearsay”. Hearsay involves a third party.

Witness: yes, he hit me.
Hearsay: my cousin told me he hit her

Thanks for playing.
 
#378
#378
Vol8188 said:
Well, you’re wrong on that one too. A witness is not “hearsay”. Hearsay involves a third party.

Witness: yes, he hit me.
Hearsay: my cousin told me he hit her

Thanks for playing.
Click to expand...
No trial, no testimony no opportunity to question the wife, no conviction. A random poster saying he beat his wife is hearsay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#380
#380
n_huffhines said:
Makes no difference to me how he got here. He was following the process after he got here. You're trying to right an old wrong with a much worse wrong. It's fkn stupid, causes chaos, and benefits nobody.
Click to expand...

Removing gang members benefits everyone
 
#383
#383
Vol8188 said:
Cool. You’re moving the goalposts. It’s not hearsay. It’s evident he’s an MS-13 member.

He needs to be returned, placed in front of a judge, and immediately redeported.
Click to expand...
The point was and is that he hadn't been convicted of anything. He needs due process, as does everyone. If that shows he's deportable then he should be deported accordingly.
 
#384
#384
Vol8188 said:
Cool. You’re moving the goalposts. It’s not hearsay. It’s evident he’s an MS-13 member.

He needs to be returned, placed in front of a judge, and immediately redeported.
Click to expand...

That would be illegal under the Laws of the United States.
 
#385
#385
EasternVol said:
The point was and is that he hadn't been convicted of anything. He needs due process, as does everyone. If that shows he's deportable then he should be deported accordingly.
Click to expand...

He already had a deportation order, and he had an AEA order..... and it only takes one.
 
#390
#390
EasternVol said:
Why then did the Court of Appeals say he hadn't?
Click to expand...

Because they took the position in the U.S.'s filing that it was done by mistake, the U.S. has clarified that it wasn't a mistake. He has a deportation order and he was determined to be an illegal further under AEA law.

He does not claim to have legal status in the U.S., there really is no controversy.
 
#391
#391
Vol8188 said:
Given the numerous courts (clearly lacks due process) he’s been in front of, can you provide me the exact ruling you’re referencing?
Click to expand...

The U.S. had a filing in which they said his removal was a mistake, the administration clarified it wasn't a mistake. He had a deportation order through immigration that he is illegal, and he was further determined through AEA to be an illegal.

Nobody nor the guy in question is disputing this... he's illegal.

See Stephen Miller interview.



There literally isn't any controversy, he's illegal... at this point the executive branch could hit him with a hellfire missile.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and Vol8188
#394
#394
Vol8188 said:
Given the numerous courts (clearly lacks due process) he’s been in front of, can you provide me the exact ruling you’re referencing?
Click to expand...
Huff and Nash both posted it a few pages back.
What did the SC have to say about him and why?
 
#397
#397
EasternVol said:
Huff and Nash both posted it a few pages back.
What did the SC have to say about him and why?
Click to expand...

I have no interest in making your argument for you. If you’d like tell me, feel free. But spare me the quiz from the man who doesn’t know what hearsay means and then moves the goalposts when asked about it
 
#398
#398
EasternVol said:
Huff and Nash both posted it a few pages back.
What did the SC have to say about him and why?
Click to expand...

The Supreme Court used the U.S. original position that it was a "mistake" or "administrative error", appeals is still using that filing. The U.S. government has clarified that it's not a "mistake", he was the right guy, sent to the right place. I have posted a stupified version for you in the video above.

As far as the rest, there is no controversy.... nobody claims he has legal status in the U.S. He could have left years ago, to wherever life carries him.
 
#400
#400
Vol8188 said:
Kinda like how little conversation there is regarding the attack against Josh Shapiro.

Switch the sides of that argument and it would be on MSM daily for the next year.
Click to expand...
Sitting Jewish Governor should garner more attention nationally. Just a few months ago he was potentially the face of the futures party. Now, domestic terrorism act at his house can’t crack the news cycle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and Vol8188
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top